https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38825
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62077
--- Comment #68 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Sven C. Dack from comment #67)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #66)
> > The issue re-appears with GCC 6, the workaround doing
> > --enable-stage1-checking=release still works.
> >
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70700
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Yep, the patch looks ok and pre-approved.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70887
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.3, 6.1.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70887
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70886
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Summary|-frename-registe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70880
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70700
--- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Mon May 2 07:42:06 2016
New Revision: 235700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix ICE in dump_pred_graph
2016-05-02 Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70879
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70873
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70700
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70884
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70873
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #6)
> So the problem seems to be peep2 runs before regrename. If you always want
> to generate two instructions there, then yes, a splitter would probably be
> better. Ac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70526
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jan de Mooij from comment #17)
> Thank you for looking into this again.
>
> I don't understand comment 16 though:
>
> > _BUT_ here we access D.3125 both as Register (the store)
> > and as its
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70900
Bug ID: 70900
Summary: a library-level class-wide subprogram is not generated
into .o/.s
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70882
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70890
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65317
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at kernel dot
crashing.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70687
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70900
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70900
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70886
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon May 2 10:08:59 2016
New Revision: 235735
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235735&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/70886
* sched-deps.c (estimate_dep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70886
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70901
Bug ID: 70901
Summary: vectorized sin cos is wrongly optimized into scalar
sincos
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70901
Lorenzo Pistone changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||blaffablaffa at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70859
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70895
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openacc
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70902
Bug ID: 70902
Summary: GCC freezes while compiling for 'skylake-avx512'
target
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70903
Bug ID: 70903
Summary: [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] wrong code with bfi @ aarch64
with -Os
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70904
Bug ID: 70904
Summary: ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is
achieved (90) with -fno-split-wide-types @ aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70860
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Mon May 2 11:25:17 2016
New Revision: 235748
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235748&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR target/70860] [nvptx] Handle NULL cfun in nvptx_libcall_value
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70903
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70902
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70851
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon May 2 11:35:59 2016
New Revision: 235750
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235750&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/70851
* c-decl.c (grokdeclarator): Diagnose when a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70526
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon May 2 11:36:38 2016
New Revision: 235751
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235751&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-05-02 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70851
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70873
--- Comment #8 from Bernd Schmidt ---
mach-reorg seems too late, I think you'd want to schedule the xors?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70905
Bug ID: 70905
Summary: [7 regression] FAIL:
gcc.c-torture/compile/20011219-2.c -Os (unrecognizable
insn)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70873
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #8)
> mach-reorg seems too late, I think you'd want to schedule the xors?
Yes, indeed. That leaves _.split4 to perform splits.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70905
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 38394
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38394&action=edit
gzipped C++ source code
The attached code, when compiled by gcc trunk dated 20160502,
do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70890
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70906
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70907
Bug ID: 70907
Summary: [7 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/savres.c -Os
execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70907
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70906
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Summary|ice in add_expr,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70879
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Which is the problem Andrew has started poking at :-) One of the paths being
explored is creating those PHIs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70908
Bug ID: 70908
Summary: [SH] Redirect function call returns
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70526
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Component|rtl-optimiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70526
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70526
--- Comment #23 from Richard Biener ---
A fix for your testcase would also be to do
template
struct AlignedStorage2
{
union U
{
char mBytes[sizeof(T)];
uint64_t mDummy;
} u;
typedef T _T __attribute__((may_alias));
const _T* a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70907
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909
Bug ID: 70909
Summary: Libiberty Demangler segfaults (4)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70895
--- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thomas is correct. Note that when gcc-6.2 is released you should be able to
replace
!$acc parallel vector_length(vl)
!$acc loop reduction(+:pi) private(t)
with
!$acc parallel loop reduc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70895
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to cesar from comment #2)
> Furthermore, as Thomas mentioned, gcc-6 does not automatically assign
> parallelism to loops inside parallel regions.
:-) GCC 6.1 does do that that.
> Consequently, y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70895
--- Comment #4 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #3)
> (In reply to cesar from comment #2)
> > Consequently, you need to
> > explicitly use num_gangs, num_workers and vector_length to determine the
> > am
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70101
--- Comment #1 from TC ---
Test case for everything except the first:
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
struct Cmp : std::less {
explicit Cmp(int) {};
};
Cmp comp(1);
std::allocator alloc;
std::vector vec;
using PQ = std::
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70467
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 2 16:17:02 2016
New Revision: 235764
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235764&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/70467
* ipa-pure-const.c (check_call)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70756
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70467
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 2 16:46:10 2016
New Revision: 235765
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235765&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/70467
* cse.c (cse_insn): Handle no-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70910
Bug ID: 70910
Summary: error declaring a type in clause-1 of a for statement
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65317
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70911
Bug ID: 70911
Summary: Typo in "warning: initialized field with side-effects
overwritten"
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70498
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Author: bernds
Date: Mon May 2 17:06:40 2016
New Revision: 235767
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235767&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Demangler integer overflow fixes from Marcel Böhme.
PR c++/70498
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70912
Bug ID: 70912
Summary: reassociation width needs to be aware of FMA, width of
expression, and other architectural details
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70910
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70911
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70498
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62314
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon May 2 18:36:40 2016
New Revision: 235777
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235777&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/62314: add fixit hint for missing "template <> " in explicit
spe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60561
Gerhard Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70854
--- Comment #2 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
As a side note, above examples are more or less a follow-up of pr67885.
---
As tested recently, some more examples from gfortran's testsuite
seem to be affected when running for example with -finit-loc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70913
Bug ID: 70913
Summary: ICE in gfc_encode_character, at
fortran/target-memory.c:227
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70913
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
For completeness, these variants compile without errors :
$ cat z2.f90
program p
type t
character :: c
end type
type t2
character :: q = transfer(t('a'), 'b')
end type
type(t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70914
Bug ID: 70914
Summary: ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1851
(and endless compilation)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62314
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon May 2 19:09:30 2016
New Revision: 235785
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235785&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/62314: C++: add fixit hint to misspelled member names
When we e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70911
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
I think it's misleading. IMHO "overwritten" would describe the situation
when the first initializer is evaluated, the resulting value is written
to the field but then the second initializer overwrite
from Jan van Dijk ---
Has this been fixed in the meantime? I tried to reproduce this on an x86_64 box
(OpenSuSE Tumbleweed) with both
g++ (SUSE Linux) 5.3.1 20160301 [gcc-5-branch revision 233849]
g++ (GCC) 7.0.0 20160502 (experimental)
Compilation with default options and running the test code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70890
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70910
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Thanks for the pointer. That seems like a rather gratuitous restriction, and
an unnecessary deviation from the C++ rule where the feature originated. I'm
also not sure that the committee's response to the DR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70900
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon May 2 20:33:47 2016
New Revision: 235789
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235789&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/70900
Backport from mainline
2016-04-18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70900
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65317
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4)
>
> What are the original instructions it tried to combine here?
(insn 7 4 8 2 (parallel [
(set (reg:SI 168 [ r ])
(lshiftrt:SI (reg/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70520
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon May 2 21:45:34 2016
New Revision: 235790
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235790&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r265322 from llvm upstream
Since x86 psABIs require the f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69004
--- Comment #15 from PeteVine ---
After deleting physfs profile data I got a little further (using gcc 6.1.0):
../src/luajit2/src/lj_gc.c: In function ‘lj_mem_newgco’:
../src/luajit2/src/lj_gc.c:816:10: error: corrupted value profile: ic profile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49244
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 2 22:12:54 2016
New Revision: 235792
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235792&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/49244
* gimple.c (gimple_builtin_call_types_com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70520
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70915
Bug ID: 70915
Summary: Improve loading 0/-1 in VSX registers on PowerPC
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49905
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45840
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67793
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Last reconfirmed|2015-10-01
-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160502 (experimental) [trunk revision 235753] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk -O3 abc.c -c
abc.c: In function ‘fn1’:
abc.c:9:1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49244
--- Comment #16 from Paolo Bonzini ---
> This also suggests there's an error in the current x86_64 kernel
> implementation
> as the kernel bitops are supposed to operate on machine word-size locations,
> so
> it should be using BTSQ not BTSL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951
--- Comment #7 from Jim Wilson ---
Created attachment 38396
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38396&action=edit
patch to add a mulv2di3 pattern
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951
--- Comment #8 from Jim Wilson ---
Created attachment 38397
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38397&action=edit
patch to use synth_mult to generate vector multiplies
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951
--- Comment #9 from Jim Wilson ---
Created attachment 38398
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38398&action=edit
testcase signed long multiply by constant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951
--- Comment #10 from Jim Wilson ---
Created attachment 38399
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38399&action=edit
testcase unsigned long multiply by constant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70684
--- Comment #17 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue May 3 00:51:30 2016
New Revision: 235801
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235801&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-05-02 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from mainline
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951
--- Comment #11 from Jim Wilson ---
I've spent some time looking at solutions to this problem.
One way to solve it is to simply add a mulv2di3 pattern to the aarch64 port.
The presence of a multiply pattern means we will go through expand_mult,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70917
Bug ID: 70917
Summary: out-of-date documentation for character set support
and environment variables
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70918
Bug ID: 70918
Summary: Internal compiler error: Illegal instruction
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
