https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58822
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70644
Bug ID: 70644
Summary: Warn about implicit conversion of 'this' to pointer to
virtual base class during construction
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70636
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This looks familiar, it might be a duplicate of another bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58822
--- Comment #29 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Michi Henning from comment #27)
> So, this is UB. Really nasty, in the sense that
>
> make_shared(args) doesn't always do the same thing as shared_ptr(new
> T(args))
It does do effectively t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70566
--- Comment #13 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Wed Apr 13 08:24:43 2016
New Revision: 234931
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234931&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] PR target/70566 Check that condition register is de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70566
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For the #c0 difference with the #c20 instrumentation there is:
/tmp/uids:"yynewstate" label_decl 101636 0 3
/tmp/uids:"yyabortlab" label_decl 101638 0 3
/tmp/uids:"yyacceptlab" label_decl 101639 0 3
/tmp/uid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70638
Hillel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hillel.avni at huawei dot com
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #29 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The different order of copy_node_stat happens during tree_function_versioning
-> remap_blocks -> remap_block -> remap_decls -> remap_decl ->
copy_decl_no_change -> copy_node_stat, and the BLOCK_VARS are alre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, the reason is clear,
hash_table *x_named_labels;
hashes based on DECL_UID (that is fine), and adds the labels during hash table
traversal (which is not fine).
Both:
static void
pop_labels (tree block)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70628
Jiong Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #31 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 38249
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38249&action=edit
gcc6-pr70594-labels.patch
Only the first spot is problematic IMHO, the latter is only for diagnostics,
and I t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---
Con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016, amodra at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130
>
> Alan Modra changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
> ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, which loop is it in this function? There are multiple ones. I assume
the last loop nest:
for (j=0;j< MB_BLOCK_SIZE;j++)
{
for (i=0;i< MB_BLOCK_SIZE;i++)
{
img->mprr_2[PLANE_16][j][
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70625
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
This is a duplicate of PR70623.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70623
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.0 |4.9.4
Summary|[6 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130
--- Comment #11 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 38250
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38250&action=edit
stand alone testcase
Compile with -m64 -O3 -mcpu=power7 -fno-common
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69650
--- Comment #58 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Author: bernds
Date: Wed Apr 13 11:40:37 2016
New Revision: 234932
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234932&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Patch from Roger Orr
PR preprocessor/69650
* di
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69650
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #32 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 38251
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38251&action=edit
gcc6-pr70594.patch
Alternate patch for the SRA fancy names in -fdump-final-insns= dumps (and other
TDF_NOUID d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70628
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Apr 13 12:26:26 2016
New Revision: 234933
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234933&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/70628
* rtl.h (convert_memory_address_addr_space
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70633
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Apr 13 12:27:52 2016
New Revision: 234934
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234934&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/70633
* gimplify.c (gimplify_init_constructo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Does the following fix it? I'm not entirely happy with it because of the
comment.
Index: gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
===
--- gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70641
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70628
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 regression] ICE in |[5 regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70633
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] ICE on |[5 Regression] ICE on valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70627
--- Comment #7 from jseward at acm dot org ---
I tried the fix at PR70029 comment 7 (disabling a check) but that
doesn't help, at least for the original, unreduced test case
(Unified_cpp_dom_animation0.ii).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70638
--- Comment #3 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Hillel Avni from comment #2)
> On gcc-linaro-4.9-2014.11, I must declare the wrapper as pure.
But using that version the wrapper was indeed used and not the original
function, right
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70641
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Guess in the
if (callee_t && recursive_call_p (current_function_decl, callee_t))
continue;
case we should set some bool flag, and if we decide to set nothrow flag at the
end and we saw some r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70638
--- Comment #4 from Hillel Avni ---
(In reply to torvald from comment #3)
> (In reply to Hillel Avni from comment #2)
> > On gcc-linaro-4.9-2014.11, I must declare the wrapper as pure.
>
> But using that version the wrapper was indeed used and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58000
--- Comment #5 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Wed Apr 13 13:17:45 2016
New Revision: 234936
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234936&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-04-13 Dominique d'Humieres
PR fortran/58000
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58000
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70607
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Aha, that DR was reverted by http://wg21.link/lwg1522 (I failed to find it
because the deleted text says "All the specified ..." and I searched for "All
of the specified ..."
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130
--- Comment #14 from Bill Schmidt ---
Unfortunately the patch doesn't help with Alan's streamlined test. It still
fails (tested on powerpc64le).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70628
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Apr 13 13:57:29 2016
New Revision: 234937
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234937&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/70628
* explow.c (convert_memory_address_addr_sp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130
--- Comment #15 from Bill Schmidt ---
Created attachment 38252
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38252&action=edit
Vectorization dump without patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130
--- Comment #16 from Bill Schmidt ---
Created attachment 38253
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38253&action=edit
Vectorization dump with patch applied
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130
--- Comment #17 from Bill Schmidt ---
Though as I look at it, the "p" field is undefined in Alan's test. Let me fix
that and see what we get.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130
--- Comment #18 from Bill Schmidt ---
Never mind, it would get zero initialization, and specifying that directly
doesn't help.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70641
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 38254
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38254&action=edit
gcc6-pr70641.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70623
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
"Patch" in testing. Note that the issue seems to be oscillating values because
of bitmap_set_and only taking expressions from 'dest', pruning out those
for which the value-and removed their value. But
mem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70645
Bug ID: 70645
Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] -fguess-branch-probability breaks
debug-information, only in Ada
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70639
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
So I think rather this one:
--- a/gcc/c-family/c-indentation.c
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c-indentation.c
@@ -239,10 +239,11 @@ should_warn_for_misleading_indentation (const
token_indent_info &guard_tinfo,
if (li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70615
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 13 14:33:53 2016
New Revision: 234940
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234940&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70615
* cp-gimplify.c (cp_genericize_r): Expand PTR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #33 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Apr 13 14:45:46 2016
New Revision: 234942
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234942&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70594
* decl.c (pop_labels_1): Removed.
(n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70634
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 13 15:02:23 2016
New Revision: 234945
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234945&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70634
* pt.c (instantiation_dependent_uneval_expre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039
--- Comment #8 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Wed Apr 13 15:04:57 2016
New Revision: 234946
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234946&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-04-13 Dominique d'Humieres
PR fortran/67039
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #2 from Josh Poimboeuf ---
$ gcc -Wp,-MD,drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/.qla_attr.o.d -nostdinc -isystem
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/5.3.1/include -I./arch/x86/include
-Iarch/x86/include/generated/uapi -Iarch/x86/include/generated -Iincl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70604
Josh Poimboeuf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #1 from Josh Poimboeuf ---
Created attachment 38256
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38256&action=edit
Linux kernel config
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
Bug ID: 70646
Summary: Corrupt truncated function
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70615
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58822
--- Comment #30 from Michi Henning ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #29)
> > make_shared(args) doesn't always do the same thing as shared_ptr(new
> > T(args))
>
> It does do effectively the same thing. The difference in behaviour is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #34 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #33)
> (pop_labels): During named_labels traversal, just push the slot
> pointers into a vector, then qsort it by DECL_UID and only then
> call pop_l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70627
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to psturm from comment #13)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12)
> > Patches are posted at
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00929.html
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70634
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on |[4.9/5 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70436
--- Comment #16 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Apr 13 16:00:52 2016
New Revision: 234949
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234949&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/70436
* c-parser.c (c_parser_statement_after_labe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70436
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70639
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70639
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70639
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Apr 13 16:28:46 2016
New Revision: 234952
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234952&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70639
* c-indentation.c (should_warn_for_mislead
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70461
Alexander Fomin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #6 from Alexander F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70635
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Apr 13 17:11:03 2016
New Revision: 234953
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234953&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2016-04-13 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/70635
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70635
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on |[4.9/5 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70173
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Apr 13 18:02:08 2016
New Revision: 234954
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234954&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Make distclean clean up more (PR70173)
Currently, distclean does no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65344
Miroslav Jezbera changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.8.3 |5.3.1
--- Comment #1 from Miroslav Je
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68749
--- Comment #8 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Wed Apr 13 18:13:31 2016
New Revision: 234955
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234955&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix gcc.dg/ifcvt-4.c on 64-bit SPARC (PR rtl-optimization/68749)
PR rt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68749
--- Comment #9 from Rainer Orth ---
SPARC V9 part fixed for 6.1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70627
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 13 18:32:11 2016
New Revision: 234956
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234956&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70627
* decl.c (start_enum): Don't change an exist
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70627
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70568
acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68242
--- Comment #7 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Wed Apr 13 18:54:41 2016
New Revision: 234957
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234957&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libgomp/
PR testsuite/68242
* testsuite/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68242
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
Denis Vlasenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vda.linux at googlemail dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #4 from Denis Vlasenko ---
Shorter reproducer:
typedef __signed__ char __s8;
typedef unsigned char __u8;
typedef __signed__ short __s16;
typedef unsigned short __u16;
typedef __signed__ int __s32;
typedef unsigned int __u32;
__extens
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #5 from Denis Vlasenko ---
Even smaller reproducer.
Bug disappears if "__attribute__((always_inline))" is removed everywhere.
typedef unsigned char u8;
typedef unsigned int u32;
typedef unsigned long long u64;
static inline __attri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #6 from Denis Vlasenko ---
I can collapse the chain of inlines down to this and still see the bug.
Removing "__attribute__((always_inline))", or merging __swab64p() and
wwn_to_u64(), makes bug disappear.
typedef unsigned char u8;
ty
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70647
Bug ID: 70647
Summary: Feature request: warning for self-moving in
constructors
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #35 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Apr 13 20:35:59 2016
New Revision: 234961
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234961&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70594
* tree-sra.c (create_access_replacement,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70641
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Apr 13 20:43:10 2016
New Revision: 234962
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234962&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70641
* ipa-pure-const.c (pass_nothrow::execute): C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #36 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Tobias said he still sees some -fcompare-debug issue even with both of these
patches, so not closing this yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70641
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70648
Bug ID: 70648
Summary: [6 Regression] adplug-xmms fails to compile
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70648
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19808
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at godbolt dot org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70647
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
mednafen at sent dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mednafen at sent dot com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70640
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Apr 13 23:26:41 2016
New Revision: 234966
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234966&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69517 - [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70588
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Apr 13 23:26:41 2016
New Revision: 234966
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234966&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69517 - [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70019
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Apr 13 23:26:41 2016
New Revision: 234966
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234966&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69517 - [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.3, 6.0
Summary|[5/6 regres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994
Bug 16994 depends on bug 70019, which changed state.
Bug 70019 Summary: VLA size overflow not detected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70019
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70019
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994
Bug 16994 depends on bug 70588, which changed state.
Bug 70588 Summary: SIGBUS on a VLA larger than SIZE_MAX / 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70588
What|Removed |Added
---
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
