https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69932
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69920
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||helloqirun at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69907
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 24 08:27:25 2016
New Revision: 233655
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233655&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-24 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/69907
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69907
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69909
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 24 08:36:16 2016
New Revision: 233656
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233656&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/69909
* expr.c (expand_expr_real_1) : Avoid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69918
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 24 08:37:41 2016
New Revision: 233657
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233657&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/69918
* params.def (PARAM_MAX_SSA_NAME_QUERY_DEPTH):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69909
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69918
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69936
Bug ID: 69936
Summary: ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu at -Os and above in both
32-bit and 64-bit modes (internal compiler error:
cannot update SSA form)
Product: gcc
Ver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69936
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69936
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68963
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, I think the issue is really in record_nonwrapping_iv doing
wide_int min, max;
extreme = fold_convert (unsigned_type, high);
if (TREE_CODE (orig_base) == SSA_NAME
&& TREE_CODE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69937
Bug ID: 69937
Summary: -Wuninitialized does not warn when an uninitialised
variable is printed before use
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69904
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69929
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34721
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kloedej at knmi dot nl
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69937
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69709
--- Comment #7 from Dominik Vogt ---
The stage1 compiler does something wrong when compiling gcc/real.c (with
-fprofile-generate). The function div_significands() (inlined into
do_divide()) returns a wrong result due to bad register usage in thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69929
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Also related to pr68040.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69760
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Patch in comment #6 bootstrapped and tested ok.
The following patch also fixes the issue:
Index: gcc/tree-chrec.c
===
--- gcc/tree-chrec.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69938
Bug ID: 69938
Summary: [6.0 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr69666.c
(internal compiler error)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69938
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|alpha-linux-gnu |alpha-linux-gnu,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69841
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jgreenhalgh at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69875
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Wed Feb 24 11:00:28 2016
New Revision: 233658
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233658&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] PR target/69875 Fix atomic_loaddi expansion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69875
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong |[4.9/5 Regression] Wrong
Please see attached
Order Conf__3360069_22_02_2016.docm
Description: Order Conf__3360069_22_02_2016.docm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69760
--- Comment #9 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> Patch in comment #6 bootstrapped and tested ok.
>
> The following patch also fixes the issue:
>
> Index: gcc/tree-chrec.c
> =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69760
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 37779
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37779&action=edit
patch
The attached also fixes the issue (creating the same code) and has "valid"
CHRECs. No vect.exp fallout
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69939
Bug ID: 69939
Summary: Ambiguous forward in experimental/tuple
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68963
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 24 12:03:27 2016
New Revision: 233660
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233660&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-24 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/68963
* tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69922
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 37780
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37780&action=edit
gcc6-pr69922.patch
Well, setting TREE_NO_WARNING on the spot where the C++ FE adds the artificial
compares is n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69938
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69940
Bug ID: 69940
Summary: gcc.c-torture/execute/alias-3.c FAILs with Solaris/x86
as
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69939
--- Comment #1 from Saswat Padhi ---
Also, the `get` should be `std::get` in the same line.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69940
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69068
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68887
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69719
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69609
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 24 12:55:31 2016
New Revision: 233661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233661&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-24 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69719
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 24 12:55:31 2016
New Revision: 233661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233661&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-24 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69783
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 24 12:55:31 2016
New Revision: 233661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233661&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-24 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69609
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69331
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa-unknown-linux-gnu |hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69886
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Wed Feb 24 13:00:10 2016
New Revision: 233662
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233662&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcse] PR rtl-optimization/69886: Check target mode in
can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69806
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69939
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69941
Bug ID: 69941
Summary: bogus zero_extend transformation in postreload on
aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69916
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Fixed on gomp4 r233663. Porting to trunk ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69916
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Feb 24 13:38:20 2016
New Revision: 233663
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233663&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR other/69916
* omp-low.c (struct oacc_loo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69922
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37780|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69936
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Verified it is r233626.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69915
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 24 13:54:39 2016
New Revision: 233664
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233664&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/69915
* tree.c (build_vector_from_ctor): Fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69915
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69939
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Feb 24 13:58:07 2016
New Revision: 233665
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233665&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/69939 Qualify get and forward
PR libstdc++/69939
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69939
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Feb 24 13:59:29 2016
New Revision: 233666
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233666&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/69939 Qualify get and forward
PR libstdc++/69939
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69224
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69939
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Version|5.4.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69919
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 37782
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37782&action=edit
Suggested patch
Well, the situation is not so easy. Ideally, I would set m_reverse_map = NULL
in
mem_alloc_descr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69224
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
It miscompiles gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr23391.c and more
(gcc.c-torture/execute/2422-1.c is another example).
Looks like latch vs. stmt execution issues to me as the affected stmts
are only after the IV exit t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69919
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69919
>
> --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
> Created attachment 37782
> --> https://gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69938
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69760
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 24 14:54:01 2016
New Revision: 233669
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233669&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-24 Richard Biener
Jakub Jelinek
PR middl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69936
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68749
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa64-hp-hpux11.11,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68749
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 37783
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37783&action=edit
sparcv9 ifcvt-4.c.227r.ce1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69942
Bug ID: 69942
Summary: gcc.dg/ifcvt-5.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-*-*, arm*-*-*, |powerpc-*-*, arm*-*-*,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69710
--- Comment #13 from Doug Gilmore ---
I think this should be fairly straightforward to fix in the
autovectorization pass. Hopefully I should be able to post a patch
in the next few days.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69942
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67854
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69943
Bug ID: 69943
Summary: expressions with multiple associative operators don't
always create instruction-level parallelism
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69705
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69935
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69898
--- Comment #3 from wander ---
Created attachment 37786
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37786&action=edit
A more detailed testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69943
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69927
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Can't reproduce - please show output with -v appended to the compiler command.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69607
--- Comment #23 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
pinged patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01632.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69760
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.0
Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69943
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
On second thought, reassociating signed addition is not legal in general
because we might introduce signed overflow where one didn't exist before.
Changing your integer example to use unsigned in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69943
--- Comment #3 from Peter Cordes ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #2)
> On second thought, reassociating signed addition is not legal in general
> because we might introduce signed overflow where one didn't exist before.
In an intermediat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69924
derrick at ca dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61949
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61949
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69839
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Are you using a sysroot for this? If not, you should.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69944
Bug ID: 69944
Summary: ctype::widen issue, use self-define do_widen, get
unexpected result.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69666
--- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Feb 24 16:20:00 2016
New Revision: 233674
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233674&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-24 Martin Jambor
revert:
2016-02-23 Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69839
--- Comment #2 from Joakim Tjernlund ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> Are you using a sysroot for this? If not, you should.
Yes, the toolchain is sysrooted at /usr/powerpc-g2.20-linux-gnu/
(toolchain built with Gentoo's crossde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61033
--- Comment #15 from Maxim Kuvyrkov ---
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Wed Feb 24 16:41:52 2016
New Revision: 233675
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233675&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/61033
* g++.dg/pr61033.C: Add a regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69839
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That is the bug then. The linker doesn't search for DT_NEEDED shared libraries
in the -L directories, but in the -rpath{,-link} ones, or in the standard
directories (which for the sysroot would be /usr/power
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69927
--- Comment #2 from jb999 at gmx dot de ---
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /tmp/gcc-4.9.3//configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc
--sharedstatedir=/var/state --localstatedir=/var/state --enable-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69839
--- Comment #4 from Joakim Tjernlund ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> That is the bug then. The linker doesn't search for DT_NEEDED shared
> libraries in the -L directories, but in the -rpath{,-link} ones, or in the
> standard d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69945
Bug ID: 69945
Summary: Provide an equivalent of __libc_freeres to release
emergency EH pool memory
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69946
Bug ID: 69946
Summary: [6 Regression] Invalid ppc64 assembly emitted starting
with r226005
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69946
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69912
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Feb 24 17:23:35 2016
New Revision: 233678
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233678&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69912 - [6 regression] ICE in build_ctor_subob_ref initializing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69912
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69927
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69927
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Should be:
markus@x4 tmp % /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.9.3/gcc -w -march=haswell
-m32 -O3 -c vf_dejudder.i
vf_dejudder.i: In function ‘filter_frame’:
vf_dejudder.i:16:1: internal compiler error:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69884
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
The compiler is letting you know that within A<__m128> the __may_alias__
attribute is discarded, which may lead to unexpected results. Since that
attribute doesn't affect type identity, so it isn't reflected
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
