https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65251
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59811
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
Call-grinding a release-checking stage3 shows get_ref_base_and_extend and
find_hard_regno_for_1 at the top.
And it shows wi::lshift_large called from get_ref_base_and_extent - exactly
what I feared... we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69768
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Seems this happens during parsing when the arguments are still not folded.
So, the question is what we want to achieve.
static int e;
extern void __assert_fail ();
int foo ()
{
("Should not call this funct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69534
--- Comment #4 from Pavel Raiskup ---
Seems like -fno-tree-dse helps on Fedora.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69308
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Feb 11 13:27:14 2016
New Revision: 233341
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233341&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-11 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69574
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Feb 11 13:27:14 2016
New Revision: 233341
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233341&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-11 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69579
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Feb 11 13:27:14 2016
New Revision: 233341
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233341&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-11 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69715
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Feb 11 13:27:14 2016
New Revision: 233341
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233341&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-11 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69606
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Feb 11 13:27:14 2016
New Revision: 233341
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233341&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-11 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69534
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, praiskup at redhat dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69534
>
> --- Comment #4 from Pavel Raiskup ---
> Seems like -fno-tree-dse helps on Fedora.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976
--- Comment #33 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Feb 11 13:30:27 2016
New Revision: 233343
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233343&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
allocator_traits> partial specialization
PR libstdc++/60976
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66823
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Feb 11 13:40:31 2016
New Revision: 233344
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233344&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-11 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66413
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Feb 11 13:40:31 2016
New Revision: 233344
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233344&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-11 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62217
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Feb 11 13:40:31 2016
New Revision: 233344
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233344&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-11 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66375
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Feb 11 13:40:31 2016
New Revision: 233344
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233344&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-11 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66794
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Feb 11 13:40:31 2016
New Revision: 233344
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233344&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-11 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69606
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62217
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66375
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66794
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66413
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66823
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69308
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Feb 11 13:49:59 2016
New Revision: 233345
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233345&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-01-18 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/69308
* gi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69308
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69768
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68973
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|segher at gcc dot gnu.org |amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273
--- Comment #27 from Hector Oron ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #25)
> Re-adding GCC 6 as regression, though graphviz is not gsoap.
Right, I initially thought it was the same issue, as it only happens on mips,
and both have a worka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076
--- Comment #63 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
I think we can close this bug. gcc-6 now compiles faster than gcc-5
and the resulting binary also runs slightly faster.
CXXFLAGS="-std=c++14 -w -Ofast" for all compilers
gcc-4.9: 24.199 compile tim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67260
--- Comment #18 from Rich Felker ---
I thought I fixed at least one occurrence of this when I forward-ported the
FDPIC patch, but in any case, if it changed since that patch was first written
then there's almost surely a log entry and hopefully a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69747
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273
--- Comment #28 from Steve Ellcey ---
(In reply to Hector Oron from comment #27)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #25)
> > Re-adding GCC 6 as regression, though graphviz is not gsoap.
>
> Right, I initially thought it was the same issu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577
--- Comment #18 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I wouldn't say there really _is_ an issue in combine; not an
implementation issue, at least.
Combine is designed to blindly try every combination it can try,
without first seeing if that is likely to r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69759
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|__builtin_alloca|__builtin_alloca and
|u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69607
--- Comment #17 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 37666
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37666&action=edit
target-1.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69607
--- Comment #18 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 37667
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37667&action=edit
target-2.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69607
--- Comment #19 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> target-1.c
> target-2.c
Managed to reproduce with intelmic offloading:
...
$ ./lean-c-intelmic/install/host/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc target-1.c
target-2.c -fopenmp -flto -flto-partition=1to1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69296
--- Comment #6 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Thu Feb 11 16:48:45 2016
New Revision: 233351
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233351&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2016-02-11 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273
--- Comment #29 from Aurelien Jarno ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #25)
> Re-adding GCC 6 as regression, though graphviz is not gsoap.
Indeed the patch that has been committed (or the same one backported to the GCC
5 branch) correc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69753
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69296
--- Comment #7 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Waiting one week for any regressions before closing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69770
Bug ID: 69770
Summary: [ARM] -mlong-calls does not affect calls to
__gnu_mcount_nc generated by -pg
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69770
cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm*-*-*
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69491
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404
--- Comment #31 from Michael Meissner ---
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 02:32:13AM +, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404
>
> --- Comment #30 from Bernd Schmidt ---
> Something like this maybe? I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57676
--- Comment #10 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #9)
> Vlad, would it make sense to record what insns needed a reload & what insns
> were generated for reloads. Then on the next iteration, if the insns
> needing
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160211 (experimental) [trunk revision 233350] (GCC)
$:
$: gcc-trunk small.c
small.c: In function ¡®fn1¡¯:
small.c:4:20: warning: right shift count is negative [-Wshift-count-negative]
void fn1() { c = d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69715
Kip Warner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69771
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69771
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |rtl-optimization
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69772
Bug ID: 69772
Summary: enum class bool comparison error
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68963
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Honza, can you please have a look at this? This looks like pretty important
bug to me.
We record_estimate of 2 (+1) from both of the a[] accesses, one is using the 1
* BIV as index and another is using 1 * B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69772
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69764
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 37668
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37668&action=edit
gcc6-pr69764.patch
Untested fix.
trunk/root-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160211 (experimental) [trunk revision 233345] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk -c -O2 abc.c
abc.c: In function 'fn2':
abc.c:18:1: error: unable to find a register to spill
}
^
abc.c:18:1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69607
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||5.3.0, 6.0
--- Comment #20 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69774
Bug ID: 69774
Summary: Corrupted 'this' passed through lambda.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69582
--- Comment #5 from ryan.burn at gmail dot com ---
My copyright assignment should be set up now. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69763
--- Comment #3 from Richard Smith ---
I'm pretty sure neither the C nor C++ committees intended for alignof(T) to
give different results in the different languages. And even with the rule in
[basic.align]p2, GCC can still choose to specify that t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
Updated spec to clarify MXCSR register, x87 FPU and MMX register state:
The interrupt and exception handlers are called by x86 processors. X86
hardware pushes information onto stack and calls the handler. The
re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69775
Bug ID: 69775
Summary: thread_local extern variable causes linkage error
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404
--- Comment #32 from Michael Meissner ---
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 05:53:35PM +, meissner at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404
>
> --- Comment #31 from Michael Meissner ---
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19705
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
Documentation patch posted for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg00809.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69776
Bug ID: 69776
Summary: Wrong optimization with aliasing
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69776
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64682
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Feb 11 22:26:35 2016
New Revision: 233356
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233356&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: More distribute_notes trouble (PR69737)
PR64682 is a probl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69567
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Feb 11 22:26:35 2016
New Revision: 233356
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233356&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: More distribute_notes trouble (PR69737)
PR64682 is a probl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69737
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Feb 11 22:26:35 2016
New Revision: 233356
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233356&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: More distribute_notes trouble (PR69737)
PR64682 is a probl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65428
--- Comment #4 from Harald Anlauf ---
I tried to follow the state of the variable "cons_state" in array.c
for the following codes:
j = 0
print *, (/ (/ (i, i=1,j) /) /)! no ICE
and
print *, (/ (/ (i, i=1,0) /) /)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69768
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 11 22:55:02 2016
New Revision: 233357
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233357&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/69768
* c-typeck.c (parser_build_binary_op): Strip no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62630
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69777
Bug ID: 69777
Summary: Give a warning when virtual function is devirtualized
into a __cxa_pure_virtual call
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69607
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||5.1.0, 5.2.0
--- Comment #21 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69768
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
--prefix=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160211 (experimental) [trunk revision 233345] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk pr65491_1.c
pr65491_1.c: In function ‘sum’:
pr65491_1.c:7:1: error: mode precision of non-integral
=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160211 (experimental) [trunk revision 233345] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk pr21255-3.c
pr21255-3.c: In function ‘f’:
pr21255-3.c:13:1: internal compiler error: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67260
--- Comment #19 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #17)
> Kaz, what do you think?
LGTM and looks like we have no choice for 5/4.9.
=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160211 (experimental) [trunk revision 233345] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk pr44551-1.c
pr44551-1.c: In function ‘foo’:
pr44551-1.c:7:1: note: The ABI for passing parameters with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69776
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
[CC'ing Martin Sebor and Joseph S. Myers as it's potentially related to
bug 65892.]
On 2016-02-12 01:20, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>> The last value is wrong, it should be 1.
>
> Why do you t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69774
--- Comment #1 from Guille ---
Note that the problem persists if we pass by reference in the lambda, i.e.
using
"t = [&] { std::cerr << &a << " \n"; };"
instead of
"t = [this] { std::cerr << &a << " \n"; };".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
--- Comment #16 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Fri Feb 12 00:24:22 2016
New Revision: 233362
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233362&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-02-12 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69708
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69098
--- Comment #12 from Patrick Palka ---
Author: ppalka
Date: Fri Feb 12 01:11:52 2016
New Revision: 233365
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233365&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/69098 (bogus errors with static data member template)
gcc/cp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69778
Bug ID: 69778
Summary: Bogus "qualifiers cannot be applied" error with
redundant (but legal) 'typename'
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69522
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Author: bernds
Date: Fri Feb 12 01:38:06 2016
New Revision: 233366
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233366&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix obstack use-after-free problems in C frontend, PR69522
c/
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69522
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|compile-time-hog|
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69779
Bug ID: 69779
Summary: [6 Regression] Invalid free in driver::finalize on
s390x running libgccjit
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67950
Andrew Dixie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at dixie dot net.nz
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68973
--- Comment #17 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 37670
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37670&action=edit
rtl dumps
dumps for pr67211.C -O3 -mcpu=power7 -fno-vect-cost-model, mainline rev 233357.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69776
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69774
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from TC ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69779
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69780
Bug ID: 69780
Summary: ICE on __builtin_alloca_with_align with small
alignment
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67260
--- Comment #20 from Rich Felker ---
The (second) patch in comment 17 seems to have fixed the build failure for
musl's complex math functions where I first encountered the problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69781
Bug ID: 69781
Summary: [6 Regression] r233362 breaks PGO/LTO bootstrap on
ppc64le
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
--- Comment #17 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Fri Feb 12 06:40:55 2016
New Revision: 233368
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233368&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-12 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
revert:
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69781
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
101 - 197 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
