https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69768
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 37665
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37665&action=edit
gcc6-pr69768.patch
So, if we are ok that we "regress" for the (10 - 10) and (&e - &e) cases in C++
(in C as before, (10 - 10) doesn't warn, (&e - &e) does), then we can use this
patch.
