https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Tobler ---
Author: andreast
Date: Wed Feb 3 22:15:21 2016
New Revision: 233111
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233111&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-03 Andreas Tobler
PR bootstrap/69611
* config/rs60
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62002
--- Comment #6 from Viacheslav Chernyshev ---
Still happens on 5.3.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
is not unrelated, it declares overloads of std::abs. If you include a
genuinely unrelated file then you get your expected output.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This exhibits the same problem:
namespace foo
{
inline double
abs(double __x)
{ return __builtin_fabs(__x); }
}
using foo::abs;
#include
int
wrap_abs (int x)
{
return std::abs (x) + std::abs(x);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69644
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 3 22:38:56 2016
New Revision: 233113
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233113&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/69644
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_expand_at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69627
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 3 22:40:22 2016
New Revision: 233114
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233114&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/69627
* diagnostic-show-locus.c (layout::get_state_at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69644
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69627
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Summary|a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54812
Che Amaya changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||katzfiller5 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69661
Bug ID: 69661
Summary: missing -Wsequence-point warning
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69661
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69662
Bug ID: 69662
Summary: -Wplacement-new on allocated one element array members
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69662
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69662
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657
--- Comment #5 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> > Recategorising as component=c++, and removing the regression marker (because
> > the change in libstdc++ that reveals t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69663
Bug ID: 69663
Summary: [ARM] Implement overflow arithmetic standard names
{u,}{add,sub,mul}v4
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancemen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69461
--- Comment #16 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Feb 4 00:39:34 2016
New Revision: 233120
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233120&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-03 Michael Meissner
Vladimir Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #5)
> I bet that adding an int overload that redirects to __builtin_abs similar to
> the others will fix the issue.
Hmm, I wonder if the following needs to hold true:
extern
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> (In reply to Wilco from comment #5)
> > I bet that adding an int overload that redirects to __builtin_abs similar to
> > the others will fix the issue.
>
> Hmm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #5)
> Note I see the long, long long, int128, float, double, long double
> overloads, but where is the plain int overload defined?
In the libc header, not in libstdc++.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69664
Bug ID: 69664
Summary: column info is lost
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69397
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68442
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69665
Bug ID: 69665
Summary: Internal error on #pragma push_macro("__FILE__")
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973
--- Comment #11 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
This should be fixed in libcpp, probably in lex.c, but maybe other places also.
A good testcase to start with would be:
/* ñ /* */
/* a /* */
cc1 -Wcomment
prog.cc:1:7: warning: "/*" within comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69664
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Summary|column info
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8529
Annaliese Saint changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joesiahleif at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69195
--- Comment #10 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #9)
> I think we have another bug in addition to the bug where we reuse a register
> that is already in use. We have the rtl below which is used to initialize
> a[
zero/trunk/root-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160203 (experimental) [trunk revision 233104] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk abc.c -O2
abc.c: In function 'fun2':
abc.c:13:1: error: conversion of register to a different size
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69349
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Feb 4 04:50:42 2016
New Revision: 233126
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233126&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69251 - [6 Regression] ICE in unify_array_domain on a flexible arra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69277
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Feb 4 04:50:42 2016
New Revision: 233126
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233126&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69251 - [6 Regression] ICE in unify_array_domain on a flexible arra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69253
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Feb 4 04:50:42 2016
New Revision: 233126
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233126&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69251 - [6 Regression] ICE in unify_array_domain on a flexible arra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69290
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Feb 4 04:50:42 2016
New Revision: 233126
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233126&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69251 - [6 Regression] ICE in unify_array_domain on a flexible arra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69251
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Feb 4 04:50:42 2016
New Revision: 233126
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233126&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69251 - [6 Regression] ICE in unify_array_domain on a flexible arra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69251
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69253
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69290
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69277
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
Fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69349
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69277
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor ---
Fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68557
Peter Cordes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter at cordes dot ca
--- Comment #2 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69369
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69369
>
> --- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich ---
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2)
> > I will take a look. It works in my tree with changes to avoid use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55143
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Thanks Bernhard -- It was a mistake to add this to the Cilk+ tracker. I was on
the road with a single screen, which probably isn't the best time to create a
tracker bug then walk through the various potenti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69666
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63805
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69666
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69607
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Tested -flto-partition=.
fails:
- balanced
- 1to1
passes:
- max
- none
- one
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69666
--- Comment #3 from Qirun Zhang ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> This invalid VCE is created by SRA. The code has multiple undefined
> behaviors in it, but we shouldn't ICE on that.
Hi Jakub,
This code example is reduced from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69666
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Qirun Zhang from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> > This invalid VCE is created by SRA. The code has multiple undefined
> > behaviors in it, but we shouldn't ICE on th
101 - 151 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
