https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #5) > Note I see the long, long long, int128, float, double, long double > overloads, but where is the plain int overload defined? In the libc <stdlib.h> header, not in libstdc++. > I bet that adding an int overload that redirects to __builtin_abs similar to > the others will fix the issue. That would be non-conforming unless libc is changed to suppress its declaration.
