https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Comment #11 from Antonio Poggiali
---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #10)
> (In reply to Antonio Poggiali from comment #9)
> > Sorry, this code:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/gcc/cgraphunit.
> > c?r1=221077&r2=2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66678
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35878
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35878&action=edit
tentative patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66652
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Jun 30 08:35:57 2015
New Revision: 225162
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225162&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Use max_loop_iterations in transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt
201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66652
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66678
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to vries from comment #2)
> Created attachment 35878 [details]
> tentative patch
That single-use case is awfully special ... just add an unrelated use
to the function and we no longer optimize aga
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
Bug ID: 66701
Summary: __cxxabiv1::__cxa_pure_virtual - can it take an
argument of the pointer to the function that was
called, please?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66702
Bug ID: 66702
Summary: #pragma omp declare simd uniform and linear issues
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60364
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66652
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Jun 30 09:57:20 2015
New Revision: 225166
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225166&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt-related patches
2015-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66642
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Jun 30 09:57:40 2015
New Revision: 225167
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225167&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add empty loop exit block in transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66136
--- Comment #14 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nsz
Date: Tue Jun 30 10:07:03 2015
New Revision: 225170
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225170&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport of r224031 from mainline
2015-06-29 Szabolcs Nagy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Known t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65686
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65742
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65779
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65797
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Component|tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65821
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65844
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65867
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65874
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Bootstrap also works for me on the GCC 5 branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65931
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #6 from Richard Bie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66121
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66137
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66178
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59967
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bdeyal at gmail dot com
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66263
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66621
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression]|[4.9/5 Regression]
|M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66626
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66648
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60364
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|paolo.carlini at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66522
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #2)
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg00965.html
Unproposing patch, as discussed here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg02086.html
New pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66703
Bug ID: 66703
Summary: [4.9] gcc.target/i386/readeflags-1.c aborts on
-march=i586
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66704
Bug ID: 66704
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in tree-vectorizer at
tree-ssanames.c:457
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66702
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 30 12:12:42 2015
New Revision: 225179
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225179&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/66702
* omp-low.c (simd_clone_adjust): Handl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66702
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 30 12:16:01 2015
New Revision: 225180
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225180&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/66702
* omp-low.c (simd_clone_adjust): Handl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66702
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66705
Bug ID: 66705
Summary: [5/6 Regression] section is missing linker error with
-flto -fipa-pta
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66704
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66704
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Index: gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
===
--- gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c (revision 225163)
+++ gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c (working copy)
@@ -4857,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66704
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66704
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jun 30 12:52:55 2015
New Revision: 225182
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225182&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-30 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/66704
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66705
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
trippels@gcc75 ~ % cat tramp3d-v4.ii
class A {
public:
A();
};
int a = 0;
void foo() {
a = 0;
A b;
for (; a;)
;
}
trippels@gcc75 ~ % g++ -r -nostdlib -O2 -flto -flto-partition=max -fipa-pta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Comment #12 from Antonio Poggiali
---
Created attachment 35879
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35879&action=edit
Temporary patch for gcc 4.9.3
A temporary patch masking the problem on gcc 4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66705
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66705
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(gdb) p debug_tree (decl)
unit size
align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x768d0690 precision
32 min max
pointer_to_this >
public external SI file t.ii line 5 co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66653
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 30 14:31:36 2015
New Revision: 225192
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225192&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/66653
* cp-tree.h (CP_DECL_THREAD_LOCAL_P): New.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66691
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Thanks for reporting this. I've started work on it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66432
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Testing tentative patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66653
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 30 15:40:38 2015
New Revision: 225193
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225193&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/66653
* decl2.c (is_late_template_attribute): Tru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66706
Bug ID: 66706
Summary: Redundant shift instruction on x >> (n & 32)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66552
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2)
I opened bug 66706.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66706
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66575
--- Comment #3 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Playing around, I've found other cases (wrong code with procedure)
causing endless compilation on my environment, e.g.
$ cat zlctp_1.f90
program p
procedure(g) :: g
procedure(g) :: g
end
$ cat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66707
Bug ID: 66707
Summary: Endless compilation on wrong usage of common
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66708
Bug ID: 66708
Summary: Possible (minor) improvement on formatted io with
format too short
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66708
Gerhard Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Gerh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60365
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66699
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Being described as similar doesn't imply they are identical in every detail.
std::pair and std::tuple are distinct classes with different requirements on
each. If you believe the are required to behave ident
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66709
Bug ID: 66709
Summary: ICE on formatted io with parameter array specifier fmt
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66709
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Whereas versions without "parameter" compile and run fine :
$ cat z_wr_fmt_ice_4.f90
program p
character(4) :: fmt(1) = '(i8)'
integer :: n
read (*, fmt=fmt) n
write (*, fmt=fmt) n
end
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66699
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66699
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And that's not even what similar means anyway.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66686
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66686
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1)
> The code doesn't look valid to me: Y is not a valid template argument for
> the template template parameter C.
But once "struct X" gets instantiated like in the v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66691
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Jun 30 17:40:55 2015
New Revision: 225200
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225200&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-30 Vladimir Makarov
PR debug/66691
* lra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66691
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I'll commit the same patch into gcc-5 branch on next week after some testing
the patch on trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66710
Bug ID: 66710
Summary: Unhelpful error message with unbalanced parenthesis
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66711
Bug ID: 66711
Summary: GCC does not correctly restore diagnostic state after
pragma GCC diagnostic pop with -Werror
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66712
Bug ID: 66712
Summary: [concepts] variadic concepts cause havoc
Product: gcc
Version: c++-concepts
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66711
--- Comment #1 from Steffen Müthing ---
I just noticed the wrong filename (error.cc) and driver (cc1plus) in the first
two outputs: I compiled those with g++ instead of gcc, but the same problem is
present in the C frontend.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 35881
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35881&action=edit
A patch
This patch fixes -mtune=i686 and -mtune=i586.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66628
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Jun 30 19:27:19 2015
New Revision: 225205
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225205&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/66628: add gcc_jit_context_add_command_line_option
gcc/jit/Chan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66546
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Jun 30 19:38:12 2015
New Revision: 225206
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225206&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/66546: Add gcc_jit_context_set_bool_allow_unreachable_blocks
gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66686
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #2)
> (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1)
> > The code doesn't look valid to me: Y is not a valid template argument for
> > the template template parameter C.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66686
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Y takes a non-type template argument which isn't provided and can't be deduced
in the instantiation (i.e., what would the value of N be in Y?)
Modifying the test case a bit to see the type Clang gives a.a sho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66713
Bug ID: 66713
Summary: atomic compare_excahnge_strong create spurious store
for x86-64 at -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66686
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4)
> Y takes a non-type template argument which isn't provided and can't be
> deduced in the instantiation (i.e., what would the value of N be in Y?)
Can't you say tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66626
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
ix86_function_regparm has
/* We don't want to use regparm(3) for nested functions as
these use a static chain pointer in the third argument. */
if (local_regparm == 3 &
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66626
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 35882
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35882&action=edit
A patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66685
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
Richard Kettlewell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard+gcc at sfere dot
greenend.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66686
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
The misunderstanding was mine -- I had forgotten that a template template can
be instantiated on a template without providing or deducing the arguments for
the latter. Please disregard my comment #4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #2 from Jason ---
(With due sense of dread:) I note that the __cxxabiv1 seems to have a v1 in it.
Why not define a v2 with a better signature? Although I realise that this is a
quality-of-implementation issue, why should an apparently
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66432
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #4)
> Testing tentative patch
Bootstrap and reg-test on x86_64 went ok.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66714
Bug ID: 66714
Summary: gomp4: libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/atomic_capture-1.c -g
ICE
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66714
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For c.exp, at -Ofast/-g, this failure looks similar:
...
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/reduction-1.c
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host_nonshm=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=0 (internal compiler error)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833
--- Comment #20 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #17)
> Increasing insn lengths unnecessarily might result in some unlucky constant
> pool placements and far branches and some code might get worse. On the
> other hand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66715
Bug ID: 66715
Summary: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/data-{2,3}
.c exec fails -Ofast
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66715
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |6.0
--- Comment #1 from vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61240
Divya Jyoti Das changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||divyajyotidas15 at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66716
Bug ID: 66716
Summary: gomp4:
libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/kernels-lo
op.c -g ICE
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563
--- Comment #40 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #39)
> Can we close this PR as fixed?
I've got
Testsuite summary for MPFR 3.1.3
==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66716
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
before try_transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt:
...
:
.omp_data_i_45 = &.omp_data_arr.11;
# DEBUG .omp_data_i => .omp_data_i_45
__ganglocal_ptr.10_47 = __builtin_GOACC_get_ganglocal_ptr ();
#
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
