https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66706
Bug ID: 66706 Summary: Redundant shift instruction on x >> (n & 32) Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org CC: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org, rv at rasmusvillemoes dot dk, segher at gcc dot gnu.org, unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Depends on: 66552 Target Milestone: --- Target: x86, powerpc64 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #66552 +++ Compiling the following function with -O2: unsigned f(unsigned x, int n) { return x >> (n & 32); } results in an unnecessary instruction to zero out the already clear high order bits of register 3 after the shift instruction: rldicl 4,4,0,59 srw 3,3,4 rldicl 3,3,0,32 blr Clang emits an optimal sequence: rlwinm 4, 4, 0, 27, 31 srw 3, 3, 4 blr Referenced Bugs: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66552 [Bug 66552] Missed optimization when shift amount is result of signed modulus