[Bug lto/65536] LTO line number information garbled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65536 --- Comment #50 from Jan Hubicka --- > > +/* Do not track column numbers higher than this one. As a result, the > + range of column_bits is [7, 18] (or 0 if column numbers are > + disabled). */ > +#define LINE_MAP_MAX_COLUMN_NUMBER (1U <<

[Bug libstdc++/65147] alignment of std::atomic object is not correct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65147 --- Comment #7 from Alexey Lapshin --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > Author: redi > Date: Thu Mar 26 19:27:02 2015 > New Revision: 221703 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221703&root=gcc&view=rev > Log: > PR libst

[Bug fortran/65596] [4.9 Regression] NAMELIST bug with f2003: reads too far

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65596 --- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle --- *** Bug 65605 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug libfortran/65605] [4.9 Regression] Namelist mishandles delim

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65605 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/65596] [4.9 Regression] NAMELIST bug with f2003: reads too far

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65596 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug lto/65536] LTO line number information garbled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65536 --- Comment #51 from Jan Hubicka --- > > Contrary to what I said before, I think now that it really makes sense for > line-maps to return UNKNOWN_LOCATION rather than the location of something > else > when overflow occurs, but then LTO has to

[Bug c/65606] New: Internal compiler error in linux-next 2015-03-25

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65606 Bug ID: 65606 Summary: Internal compiler error in linux-next 2015-03-25 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug ipa/65588] [5 Regression] lto1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65588 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/65509] [5 Regression] [C++11] GCC rejects operator== with two distinct pointers as not constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65509 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c/65606] Internal compiler error in linux-next 2015-03-25

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65606 Mateusz Krawczuk changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gist.githubusercont

[Bug c++/65592] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when using non-existent enum class enumerator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65592 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/64977] GCC incorrectly rejects constexpr variable definition.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64977 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/65579] [C++11] gcc requires definition of a static constexpr member even though it is not odr-used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65579 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/65536] LTO line number information garbled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65536 --- Comment #52 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #50) > > > > +/* Do not track column numbers higher than this one. As a result, the > > + range of column_bits is [7, 18] (or 0 if column numbers are > > + d

[Bug c++/65509] [5 Regression] [C++11] GCC rejects operator== with two distinct pointers as not constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65509 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/65509] [5 Regression] [C++11] GCC rejects operator== with two distinct pointers as not constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65509 --- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Mar 27 16:36:32 2015 New Revision: 221737 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221737&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/65509 * decl.c (make_rtl_for_nonlocal_decl): Don't defer s

[Bug c++/65556] [5 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (type precision mismatch in switch statement)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65556 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Mar 27 16:46:44 2015 New Revision: 221738 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221738&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/65556 * semantics.c (finish_switch_cond): If the unlower

[Bug c++/65556] [5 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (type precision mismatch in switch statement)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65556 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/65607] New: [5 Regression] LTO: ICE (segfault) with -fno-use-linker-plugin in symtab_node::semantically_equivalent_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65607 Bug ID: 65607 Summary: [5 Regression] LTO: ICE (segfault) with -fno-use-linker-plugin in symtab_node::semantically_equivalent_p Product: gcc Version: 5.0

[Bug c++/61973] __thread and deleted destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61973 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/65607] [5 Regression] LTO: ICE (segfault) with -fno-use-linker-plugin in symtab_node::semantically_equivalent_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65607 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ipa/65600] [5 Regression] bost testsuite failure: ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65600 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug c++/62096] unexpected warning overflow in implicit constant conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62096 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/61973] __thread and deleted destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61973 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Nadav Har'El from comment #0) > Bonus points to anyone who can figure out how I can use __thread (not > thread_local) on a type with a non-trivial destructor even in existing gcc > ;-) __threa

[Bug c++/60112] bogus error: array subscript is above array bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60112 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/47230] [4.6 Regression] gcc fails to bootstrap on alpha in stage2 with "relocation truncated to fit: GPREL16 against ..."

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230 --- Comment #27 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Fri Mar 27 17:08:44 2015 New Revision: 221739 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221739&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Install back PR target/47230 fix (Revert the revert). Added:

[Bug c++/59329] Using `assert(...)` is not allowed in constexpr functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59329 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini --- This works in mainline. I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.

[Bug c++/59329] Using `assert(...)` is not allowed in constexpr functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59329 --- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Mar 27 17:21:32 2015 New Revision: 221740 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221740&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-03-27 Paolo Carlini PR c++/59329 * g++.dg/cpp1

[Bug c++/59329] Using `assert(...)` is not allowed in constexpr functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59329 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug pch/61250] Random pch failures on x86_64-apple-darwin1(3|4).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61250 --- Comment #18 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to howarth from comment #17) > Bug 65550 may be a duplicate of this one. Like Bug 65550, the random ICEs in pch.exp are suppressed by building gcc trunk with --enable-checking=rel

[Bug c++/65608] New: [meta-bug] friend issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65608 Bug ID: 65608 Summary: [meta-bug] friend issues Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug target/65593] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2343

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65593 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Mar 27 17:35:14 2015 New Revision: 221741 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221741&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/65593 * config/i386/i386.c (legitimize_pic_address): If

[Bug c++/65608] [meta-bug] friend issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65608 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/65593] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2343

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65593 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/65609] New: std::sort is suboptimal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65609 Bug ID: 65609 Summary: std::sort is suboptimal Product: gcc Version: 4.4.7 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assig

[Bug c++/29041] failure to check for visible declaration of friend function to local class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29041 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at

[Bug c++/29843] [meta-bug] C++98 standard conformance issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29843 Bug 29843 depends on bug 29041, which changed state. Bug 29041 Summary: failure to check for visible declaration of friend function to local class https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29041 What|Removed

[Bug libstdc++/14061] poor performance of std::sort on large lexicographic c-string sort

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14061 jdcoxm3 at hotmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jdcoxm3 at hotmail dot com -

[Bug c++/35631] operator overloads defined as a friend within a class are not always correctly resolved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35631 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at

[Bug target/65407] Extra mask register move in gcc.target/i386/avx512f-kandnw-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65407 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/65610] New: Compare debug failure with -g3 -fsanitize=undefined -fno-sanitize=vptr -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65610 Bug ID: 65610 Summary: Compare debug failure with -g3 -fsanitize=undefined -fno-sanitize=vptr -O3 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/65610] Compare debug failure with -g3 -fsanitize=undefined -fno-sanitize=vptr -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65610 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- Note that the "-fno-sanitize=vptr" is crucial: without it doesn't give an ICE.

[Bug c++/41723] Error when using a qualified name to declare a nested template instantiation as a friend of the containing template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41723 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/42328] rejects valid friend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42328 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org|paolo.carlini at oracle dot com

[Bug target/65248] Copy relocation against protected symbol doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248 --- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Fri Mar 27 18:11:00 2015 New Revision: 221742 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221742&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Add default_binds_local_p_2 and use it for x86 Protected data symb

[Bug rtl-optimization/64164] [4.9/5 Regression] one more stack slot used due to one less inlining level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164 --- Comment #25 from Alexandre Oliva --- WIP patch accidentally posted to gcc-patches: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-03/msg01460.html

[Bug target/65248] Copy relocation against protected symbol doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/50126] g++ does not recognize a friend declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50126 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/51584] Erroneous compilation when deriving from an inaccessible friend class.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51584 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgomp/65611] New: examples-4/e.53.5.c examples-4/e.53.5.f90 don't work with -fPIE -pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65611 Bug ID: 65611 Summary: examples-4/e.53.5.c examples-4/e.53.5.f90 don't work with -fPIE -pie Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/57376] Bogus error due to failure of unqualified namespace lookup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57376 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/65612] New: g++.dg/ext/mvXX.C don't work with -fPIE -pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65612 Bug ID: 65612 Summary: g++.dg/ext/mvXX.C don't work with -fPIE -pie Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug libstdc++/65147] alignment of std::atomic object is not correct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65147 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Alexey Lapshin from comment #7) > It looks like this fix makes alignment of atomic object to be the same as > alignment of integral non-atomic object of the same size. That was the intention,

[Bug c++/59815] Apparently bogus error: 'Outer' is already declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59815 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug pch/61250] Random pch failures on x86_64-apple-darwin1(3|4).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61250 --- Comment #19 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Like Bug 65550, the random ICEs in pch.exp are suppressed by building > gcc trunk with --enable-checking=release. This is not true: I have seen the failure with gcc trunk configured with --enable-

[Bug libstdc++/65609] std::sort is suboptimal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65609 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/42328] rejects valid friend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42328 --- Comment #9 from Richard Smith --- Yes, I think this is ill-formed (although the standard is very unclear about this). I think the declaration template friend void freeList::foo(); would declare the member 'foo' of the class template parti

[Bug c++/65613] New: valgrind error in find_call_crossed_cheap_reg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65613 Bug ID: 65613 Summary: valgrind error in find_call_crossed_cheap_reg Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug lto/65536] LTO line number information garbled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65536 --- Comment #53 from Jan Hubicka --- > You can get an estimate of how much memory would be required to stream in/out > directly the line_table by summing up the memory reported by > dump_line_table_statistics for each TU before streaming out (p

[Bug target/65614] New: PowerPC VSX systems should use XSCPSGNDP to copy scalar fp data to/from Altivec registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65614 Bug ID: 65614 Summary: PowerPC VSX systems should use XSCPSGNDP to copy scalar fp data to/from Altivec registers Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug rtl-optimization/64688] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64688 --- Comment #19 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Fri Mar 27 19:23:15 2015 New Revision: 221743 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221743&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-03-27 Vladimir Makarov Backport from mainline 2015

[Bug libstdc++/65609] std::sort is suboptimal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65609 --- Comment #2 from jdcoxm3 at hotmail dot com --- Thanks for looking into this so quickly. My mac, running latest os (10.10.2) and xcode (6.2) also has the problem but looking deeper, it's based on version 4.2.1. I thought it would have been a m

[Bug target/65614] PowerPC VSX systems should use XSCPSGNDP to copy scalar fp data to/from Altivec registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65614 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/65614] PowerPC VSX systems should use XSCPSGNDP to copy scalar fp data to/from Altivec registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65614 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/42328] rejects valid friend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42328 --- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini --- Thanks Richard. Then I'm going to add both testcases before closing the bug.

[Bug c++/65575] [c++-concepts] Parse error for requires clause on functions that return a reference type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65575 --- Comment #5 from Tom Honermann --- r221733 seems to address the case in comment 2 for me. I have one more for you. This one is a little different (no return type involved), so let me know if you want me to open a different bug for it. $ cat

[Bug target/65456] powerpc64le autovectorized copy loop missed optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65456 --- Comment #12 from Bill Schmidt --- The problem is this declaration in rs6000.h, which forces unaligned vector stores to be scalarized during expand: /* Define this macro to be the value 1 if unaligned accesses have a cost many time

[Bug c/65586] -fopenmp-simd rejects valid input

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65586 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Mar 27 20:21:52 2015 New Revision: 221744 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221744&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-03-27 Tobias Burnus PR c/65586 gcc/c/ * c-parser

[Bug target/65614] PowerPC VSX systems should use XSCPSGNDP to copy scalar fp data to/from Altivec registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65614 --- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 35168 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35168&action=edit Proposed patch to fix the problem This patch is believed to fix 410.bwaves and 465.tonto. It will not fix 4

[Bug c++/65575] [c++-concepts] Parse error for requires clause on functions that return a reference type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65575 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Sutton --- The requires-clause comes before the = default (the = xxx) is considered part of the function definition. So: void f() requires true = default; As a side note, the production following the requires-claus

[Bug fortran/65596] [4.9,5.0 Regression] NAMELIST bug with f2003: reads too far

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65596 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.9 Regression] NAMELIST |[4.9,5.0 Regression] |

[Bug c/65586] -fopenmp-simd rejects valid input

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65586 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/65575] [c++-concepts] Parse error for requires clause on functions that return a reference type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65575 Tom Honermann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/65429] ICE on implied-length character empty array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65429 drikosev at otenet dot gr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||drikosev at otenet dot gr ---

[Bug target/65456] powerpc64le autovectorized copy loop missed optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65456 --- Comment #13 from Bill Schmidt --- Changing the condition as follows produces a nice tight lxvd2x/stxvd2x loop in all three places: #define SLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS(MODE, ALIGN) \ (STRICT_ALIGNMENT

[Bug ipa/65588] [5 Regression] lto1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65588 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Fri Mar 27 21:35:51 2015 New Revision: 221745 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221745&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/65588 * symtab.c (symtab_node::get_partitioning_class): Re

[Bug c++/65615] New: gcc says abstract class even though it isn't

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65615 Bug ID: 65615 Summary: gcc says abstract class even though it isn't Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/65610] [5 Regression] Compare debug failure with -g3 -fsanitize=undefined -fno-sanitize=vptr -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65610 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Comp

[Bug libstdc++/65147] alignment of std::atomic object is not correct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65147 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug libstdc++/65609] std::sort is suboptimal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65609 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- I only looked briefly but it might have been fixed by r151055

[Bug target/65456] powerpc64le autovectorized copy loop missed optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65456 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #14 fro

[Bug libstdc++/65420] Enumerators in std::regex_constants should be constexpr variables instead

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65420 --- Comment #1 from Tim Shen --- Author: timshen Date: Sat Mar 28 04:17:12 2015 New Revision: 221750 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221750&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/65420 * include/bits/regex_constants.h: Use constexpr va

[Bug ipa/65588] [5 Regression] lto1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65588 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

<    1   2