[Bug target/64876] Regressions in gcc-testresults for powerpc64 gccgo in 5.0 due to change for static chain for closures (219776)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64876 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|go

[Bug libstdc++/64649] regex_traits::lookup_classname() only works with random access iterators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64649 --- Comment #5 from Tim Shen --- Author: timshen Date: Tue Feb 3 08:59:24 2015 New Revision: 220365 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220365&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/64649 Backported from mainline 2015-01-22 Tim Shen

[Bug libstdc++/64680] basic_regex::operator= does not reset flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64680 --- Comment #2 from Tim Shen --- Author: timshen Date: Tue Feb 3 09:01:36 2015 New Revision: 220366 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220366&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/64680 Backported from mainline 2015-01-22 Tim Shen

[Bug preprocessor/64803] [5 Regression] __LINE__ inside macro is not constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64803 --- Comment #8 from Dodji Seketeli --- Author: dodji Date: Tue Feb 3 09:26:46 2015 New Revision: 220367 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220367&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR preprocessor/64803 - __LINE__ inside macro is not constant Consider t

[Bug libstdc++/64913] New: basic_string fails to use custom allocator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64913 Bug ID: 64913 Summary: basic_string fails to use custom allocator Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc+

[Bug preprocessor/64803] [5 Regression] __LINE__ inside macro is not constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64803 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/63504] [5 Regression] Issues found by --enable-checking=valgrind

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63504 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Feb 3 09:39:19 2015 New Revision: 220368 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220368&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR other/63504 * combine.c (reg_n_sets_max): New variable. (c

[Bug other/63504] [5 Regression] Issues found by --enable-checking=valgrind

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63504 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/64807] [5 Regression] Wrong-code because of wide-int division

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64807 Bug 64807 depends on bug 63504, which changed state. Bug 63504 Summary: [5 Regression] Issues found by --enable-checking=valgrind https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63504 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/62631] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631 --- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Tue Feb 3 09:56:45 2015 New Revision: 220369 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220369&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/62631 * config/sparc/sparc.h (TARGET_HARD_MUL): Rem

[Bug target/64851] [SH] Add atomic not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64851 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/55252] Caret diagnostic doesn't show useful location when macro clashes with name in system header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55252 --- Comment #19 from Dodji Seketeli --- (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #16) > I've tripped across this enough that I've actually filed dups twice now. > > I think it would be best to change the ordering here. > That is, the initial error o

[Bug c++/64914] New: With -g3: libiberty/md5.c:336:7: runtime error: load of misaligned address for type 'const md5_uint32', which requires 4 byte alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64914 Bug ID: 64914 Summary: With -g3: libiberty/md5.c:336:7: runtime error: load of misaligned address for type 'const md5_uint32', which requires 4 byte alignment Product: gcc

[Bug target/62631] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631 --- Comment #14 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #12) > I'm about to install a patch that changes the costs on SPARC 64-bit to: > > Use 1: > cand costcompl. depends on > 0 4 0in

[Bug sanitizer/64914] [UBSAN/bootstrap-ubsan] With -g3: libiberty/md5.c:336:7: runtime error: load of misaligned address for type 'const md5_uint32', which requires 4 byte alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64914 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug rtl-optimization/56590] Replace auto-inc-dec pass with generic address mode selection pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56590 --- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to amker from comment #1) > This surely sounds interesting. Like I suggested in PR62173, RTL optimizer > might be able to do more in address expression re-association and addressing > mode choosing. >

[Bug middle-end/61225] [5 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 --- Comment #22 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Tue Feb 3 12:15:32 2015 New Revision: 220370 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220370&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/61225 gcc.target/i386/pr49095.c: XFAIL for ia

[Bug target/58400] gcc for h8300 internal compiler error: insn does not satisfy its constraints at fs/ext4/mballoc.c: In function 'mb_free_blocks':

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400 --- Comment #16 from Chen Gang --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #15) > The patch needs to be reviewed. It's been a long time since I thought about > the _STRICT variants of the REG_OK_ macros and how all that's supposed to > work. I

[Bug c++/64915] New: lambda partially drops constness of 'this'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64915 Bug ID: 64915 Summary: lambda partially drops constness of 'this' Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug testsuite/64916] New: ira.c update_equiv_regs patch causes gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr43920-2.c regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64916 Bug ID: 64916 Summary: ira.c update_equiv_regs patch causes gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr43920-2.c regression Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug java/64917] New: Remove spurious '^L' from libjava/libltdl/COPYING.LIB.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64917 Bug ID: 64917 Summary: Remove spurious '^L' from libjava/libltdl/COPYING.LIB. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Co

[Bug java/64917] Remove spurious '^L' from libjava/libltdl/COPYING.LIB.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64917 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- The control l mark a new page. Also libltdl is imported from an upstream sources.

[Bug rtl-optimization/64916] [5.0 regression] ira.c update_equiv_regs patch causes gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr43920-2.c regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64916 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm* Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c/64918] New: invalid (?) warning when initializing structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64918 Bug ID: 64918 Summary: invalid (?) warning when initializing structure Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug bootstrap/64919] New: bootstrap failure of gcc-4.9.2 on ia64-hpux in libgcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919 Bug ID: 64919 Summary: bootstrap failure of gcc-4.9.2 on ia64-hpux in libgcc Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug bootstrap/64919] bootstrap failure of gcc-4.9.2 on ia64-hpux in libgcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919 Torbjörn Gard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tgard at opentext dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug bootstrap/64919] bootstrap failure of gcc-4.9.2 on ia64-hpux in libgcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919 --- Comment #2 from Torbjörn Gard --- Created attachment 34654 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34654&action=edit Using truss for the compile: Note that cc1 command does not exist

[Bug bootstrap/64919] bootstrap failure of gcc-4.9.2 on ia64-hpux in libgcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919 --- Comment #3 from Torbjörn Gard --- Created attachment 34655 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34655&action=edit confg.log for libgcc

[Bug bootstrap/64919] bootstrap failure of gcc-4.9.2 on ia64-hpux in libgcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919 --- Comment #4 from Torbjörn Gard --- Created attachment 34656 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34656&action=edit top level config.log

[Bug bootstrap/64919] bootstrap failure of gcc-4.9.2 on ia64-hpux in libgcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919 Torbjörn Gard changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #34656|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/64876] Regressions in gcc-testresults for powerpc64 gccgo in 5.0 due to change for static chain for closures (219776)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64876 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-

[Bug middle-end/64920] New: bootstrap-ubsan [build/gengtype -r gtype.state]: libiberty/regex.c:6970:11: runtime error: left shift of negative value -1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64920 Bug ID: 64920 Summary: bootstrap-ubsan [build/gengtype -r gtype.state]: libiberty/regex.c:6970:11: runtime error: left shift of negative value -1 Product: gcc Ver

[Bug fortran/63744] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Duplicate use-statement causes error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63744 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug fortran/59765] [4.9/5 Regression] [OOP] ICE on valid with finalizable array components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59765 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #14

[Bug middle-end/54303] -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections and -fmerge-constants do not work well together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54303 Rafael Avila de Espindola changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rafael.espindola at gmail dot

[Bug rtl-optimization/64921] New: [5 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90 with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64921 Bug ID: 64921 Summary: [5 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90 with -fPIC Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/64918] invalid (?) warning when initializing structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64918 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I think the logical side-effect in C standard terms of the initializer being overridden is that it contains a compound literal, and so executing that initializer has the side-effect of init

[Bug rtl-optimization/64921] [5 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90 with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64921 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/61225] [5/6 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milest

[Bug middle-end/64922] New: runtime error: member call on misaligned address for type 'struct _Rep'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64922 Bug ID: 64922 Summary: runtime error: member call on misaligned address for type 'struct _Rep' Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/64922] runtime error: member call on misaligned address for type 'struct _Rep'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64922 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- It might have started with r219695. Or maybe with r219823.

[Bug middle-end/64922] runtime error: member call on misaligned address for type 'struct _Rep'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64922 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x004018e7 in __exchange_and_add (__val=-1, __mem=0xfff9) at /home/marek/x/trunk/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/

[Bug rtl-optimization/64688] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64688 --- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Sorry, I should have just changed the regression marker on this rather than closing. Sorry for making more work for folks. Vlad & Jakub are in the best position to decide if this ought to be backported.

[Bug c/64918] invalid (?) warning when initializing structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64918 --- Comment #2 from Øystein Schønning-Johansen --- Really insightful, Joseph. I do understand the warning a bit better now. I have not looked into the GCC parsing code, but based on your description and my (limited) understanding of the problem,

[Bug middle-end/54303] -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections and -fmerge-constants do not work well together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54303 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/64922] runtime error: member call on misaligned address for type 'struct _Rep'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64922 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c/64923] New: [s390] Generated code uses struct padding instead of just the bitfield

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64923 Bug ID: 64923 Summary: [s390] Generated code uses struct padding instead of just the bitfield Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/64923] [s390] Generated code uses struct padding instead of just the bitfield

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64923 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug jit/64810] jit not working on armv7hl ("ld: error: /tmp/libgccjit-ZGemdr/fake.so uses VFP register arguments, /tmp/ccJFCBsE.o does not")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64810 --- Comment #24 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Tue Feb 3 17:19:58 2015 New Revision: 220373 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220373&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR jit/64810: driver, arm, jit: configure-time default options gcc/Ch

[Bug rtl-optimization/64921] [5 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90 with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64921 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- I got Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory reference. Backtrace for this error: #0 0xF763FACE #1 0xF763EBDE #2 0xF773CBBF #3 0x8048BA5 in __final_main_T2.3337 at class_allocate

[Bug c++/64877] [5 Regression] strange warning message from -Waddress

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64877 --- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Feb 3 17:21:49 2015 New Revision: 220374 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220374&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2015-02-03 Paolo Carlini PR c++/64877 * typeck.

[Bug c++/64877] [5 Regression] strange warning message from -Waddress

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64877 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|paolo.carlin

[Bug rtl-optimization/64921] [4.9/5 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64921 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Summary|[5

[Bug c/64918] invalid (?) warning when initializing structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64918 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- There isn't currently an option to disable this warning.

[Bug c++/64924] New: Callback function passed as a parameter with typename declaration produces an ICE.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64924 Bug ID: 64924 Summary: Callback function passed as a parameter with typename declaration produces an ICE. Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug c++/64924] Callback function passed as a parameter with typename declaration produces an ICE.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64924 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/64925] New: ICE with same names for dummy arg and internal procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64925 Bug ID: 64925 Summary: ICE with same names for dummy arg and internal procedure Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c++/64926] New: Variable declared in if-statement-header is in wrong scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64926 Bug ID: 64926 Summary: Variable declared in if-statement-header is in wrong scope Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Prio

[Bug c++/64926] Variable declared in if-statement-header is in wrong scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64926 Roman Proskuryakov changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid, diagnostic

[Bug c++/64926] Variable declared in if-statement-header is in wrong scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64926 --- Comment #1 from Roman Proskuryakov --- $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.8/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 4.

[Bug go/64900] gotools don't link on Solaris 11/x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64900 --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Normally libgo.so will get the symbol _Unwind_GetLanguageSpecificData from libgcc_s.so. The first step here is to find out why that didn't happen. Was libgo.so not linked against libgcc_s.so? Does libgc

[Bug c++/64926] Variable declared in if-statement-header is in wrong scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64926 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/61624] Internal compiler error: in read_type, at go/gofrontend/import.cc:669

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61624 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/60995] gccgo ignores .a files with "/SYM64/" symbol table

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60995 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/64927] New: [4.7/4.8 Regression] Surprising error with -Wsurprising (-Wall) and TRANSFER + C_ASSOCIATED

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64927 Bug ID: 64927 Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] Surprising error with -Wsurprising (-Wall) and TRANSFER + C_ASSOCIATED Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug go/60728] recover() should not work in recursive deferred fucntions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60728 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/59095] FAIL: TestMakeFunc on x32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59095 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/58075] Unable to build go on ia64-hp-hpux11.31

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58075 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/64922] runtime error: member call on misaligned address for type 'struct _Rep'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64922 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug go/57194] go binaries give "no debug info in ELF executable errno -1"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57194 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/64595] go programs abort when debug info is stripped

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||allan at archlinux dot org --- Commen

[Bug go/56839] make check: FAIL: go/types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56839 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/64925] ICE with same names for dummy arg and internal procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64925 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/64927] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Surprising error with -Wsurprising (-Wall) and TRANSFER + C_ASSOCIATED

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64927 --- Comment #1 from Harald Anlauf --- There's also a typo in the online documentation on C_ASSOCIATED: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/C_005fASSOCIATED.html "c_prt_1" should read "c_ptr_1" in two places.

[Bug c++/64266] Can GCC produce local mergeable symbols for *.__FUNCTION__ and *.__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ functions?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64266 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|U

[Bug target/64660] [SH] Convert atomic_fetch_ to atomic__fetch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64660 --- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo --- Author: olegendo Date: Tue Feb 3 20:24:13 2015 New Revision: 220376 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220376&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/64660 * config/sh/sync.md (atomic__hard, atomic_

[Bug debug/64511] [5 Regression] ICE at -O3 with -g enabled on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511 --- Comment #21 from Alexandre Oliva --- I went back to r219641, just before the problem disappeared again, installed the r220031 patch to fix the dwarf2out crash, and compilation completed sucessfully in 36s. Installing the patch for bug 64817

[Bug rtl-optimization/64756] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64756 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Feb 3 20:41:38 2015 New Revision: 220377 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220377&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/64756 * cse.c (invalidate_dest): New function.

[Bug fortran/64925] ICE with same names for dummy arg and internal procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64925 --- Comment #2 from Bill Long --- The error message in Comment 1 provides correct information, and the compilation does not cause an ICE, so this is a definite improvement.

[Bug other/64928] New: unreasonable cpu time and memory usage in "phase opt and generate" with -ftest-coverage -fprofile-arcs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64928 Bug ID: 64928 Summary: unreasonable cpu time and memory usage in "phase opt and generate" with -ftest-coverage -fprofile-arcs Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIR

[Bug other/64928] Inordinate cpu time and memory usage in "phase opt and generate" with -ftest-coverage -fprofile-arcs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64928 --- Comment #1 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu --- Created attachment 34660 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34660&action=edit Input file for bug

[Bug rtl-optimization/64921] [4.9/5 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64921 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3) > gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90 seems to fail at random on trunk > and 4.9 branch: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-02/msg00308.html > > It is caused b

[Bug other/64928] Inordinate cpu time and memory usage in "phase opt and generate" with -ftest-coverage -fprofile-arcs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64928 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Note phase opt and generate is a toplevel time area. The passes which take most of the time are: tree DSE: 2.80 ( 8%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 2.80 ( 8%) wall 0 kB ( 0%) ggc out of ssa

[Bug libstdc++/64929] New: [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/48362.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64929 Bug ID: 64929 Summary: [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/48362.cc Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug other/64928] Inordinate cpu time and memory usage in "phase opt and generate" with -ftest-coverage -fprofile-arcs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64928 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog --- Comment #3 from And

[Bug jit/64257] JIT documentation is not yet on the GCC website

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64257 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- Patch is installed on relevant machine, and showed up in last night's cronjob log: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gccadmin/2015-q1/msg00075.html as: sphinx-build -b html -d _build/doctrees . _build/html make: sp

[Bug libstdc++/64929] [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/48362.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64929 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- r219953 doesn't fix 32: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-02/msg00332.html

[Bug bootstrap/63888] [5 Regression] bootstrap failed when configured with -with-build-config=bootstrap-asan --disable-werror

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888 --- Comment #23 from Eric Christopher --- So, I think Jakub's solution is strictly better here as it allows intermixing of asan and non-asan code. It'll involve a bit of work in llvm's middle end to keep track of symbol type to make sure to emit

[Bug libstdc++/64929] [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/48362.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64929 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- Also happens on Fedora 20 x86-32 and x86-64 with python-2.7.5-15.fc20: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-02/msg00335.html https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-02/msg00335.html $2 = std::tuple con

[Bug fortran/64927] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Surprising error with -Wsurprising (-Wall) and TRANSFER + C_ASSOCIATED

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64927 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug other/64928] Inordinate cpu time and memory usage in "phase opt and generate" with -ftest-coverage -fprofile-arcs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64928 --- Comment #4 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu --- On 02/03/2015 04:32 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- > Note phase opt and generate is a toplevel time area. > The passes which take most of the t

[Bug bootstrap/63888] [5 Regression] bootstrap failed when configured with -with-build-config=bootstrap-asan --disable-werror

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888 --- Comment #24 from Eric Christopher --- For the record btw, I don't believe there's a reason why the linker couldn't split up the data section by knowing the size of the variable so it's worth being very careful here - there be dragons and thin

[Bug fortran/64927] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Surprising error with -Wsurprising (-Wall) and TRANSFER + C_ASSOCIATED

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64927 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 09:49:16PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > I'll fix the typos in the manual in few minutes. > Fixed by r220381 in 5.0 and by r220382 in 4.9.

[Bug bootstrap/63888] [5 Regression] bootstrap failed when configured with -with-build-config=bootstrap-asan --disable-werror

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888 --- Comment #25 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Eric Christopher from comment #24) > For the record btw, I don't believe there's a reason why the linker couldn't > split up the data section by knowing the size of the variable so it's worth >

[Bug bootstrap/63888] [5 Regression] bootstrap failed when configured with -with-build-config=bootstrap-asan --disable-werror

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888 --- Comment #26 from Eric Christopher --- Sure. Not the general case for other targets though.

[Bug bootstrap/63888] [5 Regression] bootstrap failed when configured with -with-build-config=bootstrap-asan --disable-werror

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888 --- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek --- And even without section anchors, there is no guarantee there aren't relative relocations in between the symbols, that just have been applied already at assembly time (say relocations against .L* symbols). A

[Bug bootstrap/63888] [5 Regression] bootstrap failed when configured with -with-build-config=bootstrap-asan --disable-werror

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888 --- Comment #28 from Eric Christopher --- Ah, but not every platform is ELF :) ld64 has the flexibility to do this with Mach-O. As I said, I don't have any better ideas at the moment, but warning that it is possible to break.

[Bug target/64205] [5 Regression] powerpc64-linux --with-cpu=G5 bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64205 --- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner --- Is -mcpu=power7 -mno-hard-dfp really a reasonable option? I built a toolchain using --with-cpu=power5 from subversion id 219607 on a powerpc64 linux system, and the system bootstrapped. If I compile the

[Bug target/64205] [5 Regression] powerpc64-linux --with-cpu=G5 bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64205 --- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner --- Ah, ok, it helps to read the bug report. If you bootstrap with --with-cpu=G5 it fails, --with-cpu=power5 passes.

[Bug target/64930] New: [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/atomic-p7.c scan-assembler-times isync 12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64930 Bug ID: 64930 Summary: [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/atomic-p7.c scan-assembler-times isync 12 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

  1   2   >