https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400
--- Comment #16 from Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #15) > The patch needs to be reviewed. It's been a long time since I thought about > the _STRICT variants of the REG_OK_ macros and how all that's supposed to > work. I'll have to read up on their semantics before I can review this > patch. Can I do anything helpful for this issue, next? If I can, please let me know, and I shall try.