https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400

--- Comment #16 from Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #15)
> The patch needs to be reviewed.  It's been a long time since I thought about
> the _STRICT variants of the REG_OK_ macros and how all that's supposed to
> work.  I'll have to read up on their semantics before I can review this
> patch.

Can I do anything helpful for this issue, next? If I can, please let me know,
and I shall try.

Reply via email to