[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

2015-01-10 Thread david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 --- Comment #13 from David Abdurachmanov --- Created attachment 34416 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34416&action=edit 31-lines, minimal testcase I am adding 31-lines minimal testcase. Should be good enough for GCC testsui

[Bug fortran/60334] Segmentation fault on character pointer assignments

2015-01-10 Thread vehre at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60334 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gmx dot de --- Comment #4 f

[Bug libstdc++/64553] [5 Regression] Missing '# ifdef _GLIBCXX_USE_WCHAR_T' in src/c++11/cxx11-shim_facet.cc

2015-01-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64553 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/64555] New: Fail to compile array pointer to derived-type components

2015-01-10 Thread thfanning at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64555 Bug ID: 64555 Summary: Fail to compile array pointer to derived-type components Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Prio

[Bug fortran/64522] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Free-form source code: -Wline-truncation is no longer enabled by default

2015-01-10 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64522 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus --- Author: burnus Date: Sat Jan 10 15:49:37 2015 New Revision: 219424 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219424&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-01-10 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/64522 * invoke.te

[Bug fortran/64555] Fail to compile array pointer to derived-type components

2015-01-10 Thread thfanning at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64555 Thomas Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |major

[Bug c++/64491] warning: loop exit may only be reached after undefined behavior

2015-01-10 Thread joona.kiiski at iki dot fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64491 joona.kiiski at iki dot fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joona.kiiski at iki dot fi -

[Bug c++/64491] warning: loop exit may only be reached after undefined behavior

2015-01-10 Thread joona.kiiski at iki dot fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64491 --- Comment #3 from joona.kiiski at iki dot fi --- The correct link is: https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/tree/gcc_bug/src

[Bug c++/32039] Using declaration accepts non-visible members from base classes

2015-01-10 Thread ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32039 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/64491] [5 Regression] incorrect warning: loop exit may only be reached after undefined behavior

2015-01-10 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64491 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Last reconfirmed|2015-01-04 0

[Bug fortran/64555] Fail to compile array pointer to derived-type components

2015-01-10 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64555 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/62250] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/alloc_comp_1.f90 -fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single

2015-01-10 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62250 --- Comment #14 from David Edelsohn --- It seems to be fixed on AIX again. The status is confusing with the flurry of patches.

[Bug fortran/64555] Fail to compile array pointer to derived-type components

2015-01-10 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64555 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Known to f

[Bug c++/32039] Using declaration accepts non-visible members from base classes

2015-01-10 Thread harald at gigawatt dot nl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32039 --- Comment #8 from Harald van Dijk --- (In reply to Ville Voutilainen from comment #7) > This is invalid. [namespace.udecl]/3 says that if the declaration names > a constructor, the nested-name-specifier shall name a direct base, but if > the de

[Bug c++/32039] Using declaration accepts non-visible members from base classes

2015-01-10 Thread ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32039 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|INVALID

[Bug lto/64374] [5.0 regression] LTO ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327

2015-01-10 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64374 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- start FAIL r218767

[Bug c++/32039] Using declaration accepts non-visible members from base classes

2015-01-10 Thread ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32039 --- Comment #10 from Ville Voutilainen --- Ok, this is http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_closed.html#1960 which says "The rule was introduced because the hiding of a base class member by an intermediate derived class is potentially int

[Bug c++/57971] Improve copy elision when returning structs by value

2015-01-10 Thread gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57971 Eelis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis

[Bug ada/64548] Lost visibility of package System after raise

2015-01-10 Thread simon at pushface dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64548 --- Comment #1 from simon at pushface dot org --- As you may have gathered, I’m building an RTS. It turns out that the fault is triggered - regardless of -gnatg - if there is a-except.ads in the same directory which says “private with System;”.

[Bug ada/64556] New: Aspect Preelaborate is ignored on library-level subprogram

2015-01-10 Thread simon at pushface dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64556 Bug ID: 64556 Summary: Aspect Preelaborate is ignored on library-level subprogram Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug rtl-optimization/64557] New: get_addr in true_dependence_1 cannot handle VALUE inside an expr

2015-01-10 Thread wmi at google dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64557 Bug ID: 64557 Summary: get_addr in true_dependence_1 cannot handle VALUE inside an expr Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/64557] get_addr in true_dependence_1 cannot handle VALUE inside an expr

2015-01-10 Thread wmi at google dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64557 --- Comment #1 from wmi at google dot com --- The experimental patch is to call get_addr for VALUE of base before plus other constant, when creating mem_addr for dependence check and for store_info. bootstrap and regression on x86_64-linux-gnu are

[Bug rtl-optimization/64557] get_addr in true_dependence_1 cannot handle VALUE inside an expr

2015-01-10 Thread ppluzhnikov at google dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64557 Paul Pluzhnikov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppluzhnikov at google dot com --- Comm

[Bug ipa/64559] New: ICE at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu in remove_unreachable_nodes, at ipa.c:582

2015-01-10 Thread su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 5.0.0 20150110 (experimental) [trunk revision 219421] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O1 small.c; a.out $ gcc-4.9 -Os small.c; a.out $ $ gcc-trunk -Os