[Bug middle-end/63926] [5 Regression] ICE in estimate_edge_growth, at ipa-inline.h:300

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63926 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||63470 --- Comment #3 from Joost Van

[Bug target/64030] New: some libiberty sources includes stdio.h prior to config.h causing redefined symbol warnings on i?86-*-solaris2.11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64030 Bug ID: 64030 Summary: some libiberty sources includes stdio.h prior to config.h causing redefined symbol warnings on i?86-*-solaris2.11 Product: gcc Version: 4.9

[Bug tree-optimization/64031] New: Vectorization of max/min is not robust enough

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64031 Bug ID: 64031 Summary: Vectorization of max/min is not robust enough Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tre

[Bug c++/63905] redundant fields left in gcc/cp/cp-tree.h:lang_decl_fn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63905 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/64031] Vectorization of max/min is not robust enough

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64031 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- -ffast-math lets it vectorize (using min directly). Otherwise, for the first test, ifcvt gives (a

[Bug c++/63959] G++ misreports volatile int as trivially copyable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63959 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|ville.voutil

[Bug libstdc++/63497] std::regex can't handle [^class] correctly and cause runtime crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63497 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|moophy at foxmail dot com | Component|c++

[Bug c++/63423] internal compiler error: in cp_parser_abort_tentative_parse, at cp/parser.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63423 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/63385] internal compiler error: in pop_binding, at cp/name-lookup.c for implicitly captured variable called closure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63385 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini --- Jason, can we resolve this?

[Bug c++/63216] gcc crash: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63216 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/60943] [C++1y] Return type deduction interferes with ref-qualifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60943 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/61019] ICE: incomplete type of class template as pseudo-destructor-name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61019 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Status|U

[Bug c++/57758] gcc accepts incorrect in-class brace initializers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57758 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/48483] Construct from yourself w/o warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48483 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lundberj at gmail dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/57919] [C++11] Alias templates cause partial specialization to erroneously fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57919 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/63875] Bogus unused-but-set-parameter warning when expanding a variadic template argument pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63875 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|tejohnson at google dot com|jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug ipa/63671] [5 Regression] 21% tramp3d-v4 performance hit due to -fdevirtualize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63671 --- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka --- Created attachment 34076 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34076&action=edit Patch to fix aliases and dead code removal. One of problem was the abstract origin tracking already solved. Othe

[Bug c++/63786] crash on argument pack in switch case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63786 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/63940] C++ constexpr errors on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63940 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/63472] transaction_atomic within while loop causes ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63472 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|spear at cse dot lehigh.edu| Severity|critical

[Bug ipa/61324] [5 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV at ipa-comdats.c:321 with -fno-use-cxa-atexit -fkeep-inline-functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61324 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- It is caused by r210597.

[Bug c/64032] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c (test for warnings, line 18)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64032 Bug ID: 64032 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c (test for warnings, line 18) Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug target/62018] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/ftrapv-1.c * execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin13

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62018 --- Comment #25 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #23) > 2. we have so many versions, different layouts and version-specific issues, > that I think it's time to reorganise our GCC extensions library to meet >

[Bug target/62018] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/ftrapv-1.c * execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin13

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62018 --- Comment #26 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- Created attachment 34077 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34077&action=edit Patch removing 10.4 and earlier support from our specs/driver

[Bug rtl-optimization/64033] New: [5.0 Regression] ICE: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7741

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64033 Bug ID: 64033 Summary: [5.0 Regression] ICE: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7741 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/62018] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/ftrapv-1.c * execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin13

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62018 --- Comment #27 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #25) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #23) > > 2. we have so many versions, different layouts and version-specific issues, > > that I think it's time to

[Bug bootstrap/63703] [4.9.2 Regression] cc1: internal compiler error: in init_reg_sets, at reginfo.c:178

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703 --- Comment #7 from Denis Excoffier --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #6) There is no lldb here, and also no direct 'bt' available. I used gdb with a break point: % cd /tmp/lcl/tmp/gcc/obj % % grep -n 'gcc_assert (sizeof reg_

[Bug c++/63940] C++ constexpr errors on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63940 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- 32-bit x86 looks OK: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-11/msg02534.html https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-11/msg02537.html

[Bug bootstrap/63703] [4.9.2 Regression] cc1: internal compiler error: in init_reg_sets, at reginfo.c:178

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2014-11-22 00:00:00 |2014-11-23 CC|

[Bug target/53976] [SH] Unnecessary clrt/sett after bt/bf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53976 --- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo --- Created attachment 34078 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34078&action=edit Reduced problem from linux kernel This one exposes a problem of the sh_optimize_sett_clrt RTL pass, where it will t

[Bug middle-end/62247] [5.0 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/abi/anon3.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler .weak(_definition)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62247 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin --- We now have: FAIL: g++.dg/abi/anon3.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler .weak(_definition)?[ \t]_?_ ZTI4Heya FAIL: g++.dg/abi/anon3.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler .weak(_definition)?[ \t]_?_ ZTIN4Heya1AE FAIL:

[Bug middle-end/62247] [5.0 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/abi/anon3.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler .weak(_definition)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62247 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 34079 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34079&action=edit Assembler output

[Bug bootstrap/63703] [4.9.2/5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on powerpc-apple-darwin, cc1: internal compiler error: in init_reg_sets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/62018] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/ftrapv-1.c * execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin13

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62018 --- Comment #28 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #27) > 10.7+ - (albeit 10.7 is somewhat transitionary) > here we need to stop building the eh stuff into libgcc, we probably need to > split the emul

[Bug middle-end/60102] [4.9/5 Regression] powerpc fp-bit ices at dwf_regno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60102 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/63703] [4.9.2/5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on powerpc-apple-darwin, cc1: internal compiler error: in init_reg_sets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703 --- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe --- sorry I fixed this months ago locally.. I will push a patch to fix ASAP. note that there are 4 bootstrap breakers on PPC (trunk) 1. this 2. libcc1 (same fail as x86) 3. libiberty needs some options massage t

[Bug bootstrap/63703] [4.9.2/5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on powerpc-apple-darwin, cc1: internal compiler error: in init_reg_sets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703 --- Comment #11 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #10) > note that there are 4 bootstrap breakers on PPC (trunk) More annoying, I think, is that this one is also on 4.9, and actually made it into the 4.9.2 re

[Bug libstdc++/63497] std::regex can't handle [^class] correctly and cause runtime crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63497 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, I think this is OK for the branch

[Bug target/55023] hppa: wrong code generated with tail call optimisation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55023 --- Comment #12 from John David Anglin --- Breakpoint 3, delete_dead_store_insn (insn_info=0x1b5ccf0) at ../../gcc/gcc/dse.c:948 948 if (!dbg_cnt (dse)) (gdb) p *insn_info $3 = {cannot_delete = false, wild_read = false, non_frame_wild_re

[Bug tree-optimization/64034] New: [5 regression] cc1 stack-overflow with -O2 -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64034 Bug ID: 64034 Summary: [5 regression] cc1 stack-overflow with -O2 -fsanitize=undefined Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/64034] [5 regression] cc1 stack-overflow with -O2 -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64034 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/63203] Self-initialization of reference not diagnosed if it occurs within a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63203 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/63940] C++ constexpr errors on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63940 --- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn --- HJ, The test was not failing on Linux x86-64 nor x86-32. I sent pre-processed testcase from AIX that Jason was able to reproduce on Linux. But the fix did not solve the failure on AIX.

[Bug target/53976] [SH] Unnecessary clrt/sett after bt/bf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53976 --- Comment #10 from Oleg Endo --- Author: olegendo Date: Sun Nov 23 21:16:26 2014 New Revision: 217987 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217987&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/53976 * config/sh/sh_optimize_sett_clrt.cc (sh_

[Bug c++/64035] New: [C++11] ICE in reshape_init_r when using initializer list aggregate initialization for default function parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64035 Bug ID: 64035 Summary: [C++11] ICE in reshape_init_r when using initializer list aggregate initialization for default function parameters Product: gcc Version: 4.

[Bug target/53976] [SH] Unnecessary clrt/sett after bt/bf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53976 --- Comment #11 from Oleg Endo --- Author: olegendo Date: Sun Nov 23 21:45:18 2014 New Revision: 217989 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217989&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ Backport from mainline 2014-11-23 Oleg Endo PR target

[Bug target/64036] New: [SH] Evaluate re-enabling scheduling before RA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64036 Bug ID: 64036 Summary: [SH] Evaluate re-enabling scheduling before RA Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: targ

[Bug c++/64037] New: Miscompilation with LTO and enum class : char parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64037 Bug ID: 64037 Summary: Miscompilation with LTO and enum class : char parameter Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c++/64037] Miscompilation with LTO and enum class : char parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64037 --- Comment #1 from Julian Stecklina --- Created attachment 34083 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34083&action=edit gcc --verbose --version for 4.9.1

[Bug c++/64037] Miscompilation with LTO and enum class : char parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64037 --- Comment #2 from Julian Stecklina --- Created attachment 34084 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34084&action=edit gcc --verbose --version for 4.9.2

[Bug c++/64037] Miscompilation with LTO and enum class : char parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64037 --- Comment #3 from Julian Stecklina --- Created attachment 34085 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34085&action=edit Miscompiled binary (built with 4.9.2)

[Bug target/64037] Miscompilation with LTO and enum class : char parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64037 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Component|c++

[Bug fortran/44054] Handle -Werror, -Werror=, -fdiagnostics-show-option, !GCC$ diagnostic (pragmas) and color

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44054 --- Comment #19 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Author: manu Date: Sun Nov 23 23:47:42 2014 New Revision: 217992 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217992&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2014-11-23 Manuel López-Ibáñez PR fo

[Bug c/59708] clang-compatible checked arithmetic builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708 --- Comment #21 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 22-Nov-14, at 2:31 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Is that with r217946 or later? This is now fixed on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu. -- John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net

[Bug bootstrap/64023] [5 Regression] r216964 breaks bootstrap on darwin when using gcc as the bootstrap compiler.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64023 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Last reconfirmed|2014-

[Bug target/55023] hppa: wrong code generated with tail call optimisation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55023 --- Comment #13 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 34086 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34086&action=edit Patch Testing...

[Bug bootstrap/64023] [5 Regression] r216964 breaks bootstrap on darwin when using gcc as the bootstrap compiler.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64023 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #3) > Even with that patch, there remains the "silent" issue of not linking > statically when clang is the system compiler. The underlying issue is that ld64

[Bug testsuite/64038] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-5.c (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64038 Bug ID: 64038 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-5.c (test for excess errors) Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug middle-end/63790] [5 Regression] Tests XFAILed because of the match-and-simplify merge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63790 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug tree-optimization/64039] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c scan-tree-dump optimized "return 28;"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64039 Bug ID: 64039 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c scan-tree-dump optimized "return 28;" Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug libstdc++/64040] New: FAIL: 23_containers/vector/ext_pointer/types/2.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64040 Bug ID: 64040 Summary: FAIL: 23_containers/vector/ext_pointer/types/2.cc execution test Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/63852] [5 regression] acats failures on x86_64-apple-darwin14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63852 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug libstdc++/64040] FAIL: 23_containers/vector/ext_pointer/types/2.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64040 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Strange. Maybe some number is overflowing and trying to allocate a huge number of bytes. I'll try to look into it but not for a few days.

[Bug libstdc++/64040] FAIL: 23_containers/vector/ext_pointer/types/2.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64040 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. 0xc020e9d8 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libc.2 (gdb) bt #0 0xc020e9d8 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libc.2 #1 0xc01a9a74 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libc.2 #2 0xc01eadf8 in ?? (

[Bug target/64015] [5.0 Regression] AArch64 ICE due to conditional compare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64015 --- Comment #2 from Zhenqiang Chen --- You force it to register? In fact, I tend to not force it to register in gen_ccmp_next, since it will introduce more overhead for ccmp, which performance maybe worse. My patch to fix the issue is at: https:

[Bug target/64015] [5.0 Regression] AArch64 ICE due to conditional compare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64015 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Zhenqiang Chen from comment #2) > 2) How to justify it is valueable (the overhead of ccmp is OK) when > generating ccmp? If we ignore the case for swapping. Try this one: int test (int a, int b)

[Bug target/64015] [5.0 Regression] AArch64 ICE due to conditional compare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64015 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > See how with forcing is always the same size or smaller? Actually is always smaller by at least one instruction. due to the need to do one extra cset and one an

[Bug middle-end/64012] GCC-4.9.2 option -fcaller-saves in -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64012 --- Comment #4 from Airbak --- When I build toolchain with GNU , the problem also exist. -- lijianhui@key:~/hi3535/Hi3535_SDK_V2.0.3.1/osdrv/kernel/linux-3.4.y$ arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi-gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=a

[Bug target/64015] [5.0 Regression] AArch64 ICE due to conditional compare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64015 --- Comment #5 from Zhenqiang Chen --- It seams you always win with ccmp. Please go ahead for your patch and make sure the following case work. int test (unsigned short a, unsigned char b) { return a > 0xfff2 && b > 252; } Thanks! -Zhenqiang

[Bug middle-end/64012] GCC-4.9.2 option -fcaller-saves in -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64012 --- Comment #5 from Airbak --- I'm sorry for my mistake. GCC-4.8.3 also have this phenomenon. GCC 4.4.1 is OK.

[Bug fortran/63938] OpenMP atomic update does not protect access to automatic array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63938 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/64041] New: wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64041 Bug ID: 64041 Summary: wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-o

[Bug go/64021] Empty struct vs libffi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64021 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #4 from Richard Hende