https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62247
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- We now have: FAIL: g++.dg/abi/anon3.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler .weak(_definition)?[ \t]_?_ ZTI4Heya FAIL: g++.dg/abi/anon3.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler .weak(_definition)?[ \t]_?_ ZTIN4Heya1AE FAIL: g++.dg/abi/anon3.C -std=c++11 scan-assembler .weak(_definition)?[ \t]_?_ ZTI4Heya FAIL: g++.dg/abi/anon3.C -std=c++11 scan-assembler .weak(_definition)?[ \t]_?_ ZTIN4Heya1AE FAIL: g++.dg/abi/anon3.C -std=c++14 scan-assembler .weak(_definition)?[ \t]_?_ ZTI4Heya FAIL: g++.dg/abi/anon3.C -std=c++14 scan-assembler .weak(_definition)?[ \t]_?_ ZTIN4Heya1AE FAIL: g++.dg/abi/rtti3.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler .weak[ \t]_?_ZTSPP1A FAIL: g++.dg/abi/rtti3.C -std=c++11 scan-assembler .weak[ \t]_?_ZTSPP1A FAIL: g++.dg/abi/rtti3.C -std=c++14 scan-assembler .weak[ \t]_?_ZTSPP1A as of r217956.