https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62247

--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
We now have:

FAIL: g++.dg/abi/anon3.C  -std=c++98  scan-assembler .weak(_definition)?[
\t]_?_
ZTI4Heya
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/anon3.C  -std=c++98  scan-assembler .weak(_definition)?[
\t]_?_
ZTIN4Heya1AE
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/anon3.C  -std=c++11  scan-assembler .weak(_definition)?[
\t]_?_
ZTI4Heya
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/anon3.C  -std=c++11  scan-assembler .weak(_definition)?[
\t]_?_
ZTIN4Heya1AE
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/anon3.C  -std=c++14  scan-assembler .weak(_definition)?[
\t]_?_
ZTI4Heya
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/anon3.C  -std=c++14  scan-assembler .weak(_definition)?[
\t]_?_
ZTIN4Heya1AE
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/rtti3.C  -std=c++98  scan-assembler .weak[ \t]_?_ZTSPP1A
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/rtti3.C  -std=c++11  scan-assembler .weak[ \t]_?_ZTSPP1A
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/rtti3.C  -std=c++14  scan-assembler .weak[ \t]_?_ZTSPP1A

as of r217956.

Reply via email to