https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61718
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61718
--- Comment #2 from goughost ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > defaulthidden
>
> Simple since YYY is hidden (by the paragma), XXX has to be also hidden
> because there is no way to export the class XXX since it depends
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61719
Bug ID: 61719
Summary: misleading error message
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61720
Bug ID: 61720
Summary: std::regex_search matches incorrectly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr49095.c scan-assembler-not test[lq]
Still failing after revision r210921 (-m32 only).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423
--- Comment #29 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cbaylis
Date: Sat Jul 5 11:58:06 2014
New Revision: 212303
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212303&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] PR target/49423
2014-07-05 Charles Baylis
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61682
Andi Kleen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61721
Bug ID: 61721
Summary: GCC 4.8-4.10 miscompiles webkit hashing
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61721
--- Comment #1 from Lauri Kasanen ---
Created attachment 33073
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33073&action=edit
Failing preprocessed source from 4.10-git
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61721
--- Comment #2 from Lauri Kasanen ---
Created attachment 33074
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33074&action=edit
Working case from 4.10-git (-fno-inline)
: ./configure --prefix=/tmp/install --enable-shared
--enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu
--disable-multilib --with-system-zlib --enable-languages=c,c++
--disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.10.0 20140705 (experimental) (GCC)
Full build command used:
/tmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61721
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61722
Bug ID: 61722
Summary: [ 4.9 ] gcc sometimes does not optimise movaps with
movups
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61721
--- Comment #5 from Lauri Kasanen ---
A -fsanitize=undefined built binary does not print anything. I understand it
can't catch all undefined behavior?
What is more interesting that adding -fsanitize=undefined to a failing case
makes it work, cha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61721
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61723
Bug ID: 61723
Summary: [C++11] ICE in contains_struct_check
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61679
--- Comment #1 from Trevor Saunders ---
The following patch compiles with 4.9 for me, but I don't have easy
access to a machine with 4.5 on it, would you mind testing if it works
for you?
diff --git a/gcc/hash-table.h b/gcc/hash-table.h
index 22
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61724
Bug ID: 61724
Summary: Some loops not vectorised
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61724
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Most likely aliasing is getting in the way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61725
Bug ID: 61725
Summary: [4.9 Regression] __builtin_ffs(0) leads to bad code
generation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61679
--- Comment #2 from Gary Funck ---
(In reply to Trevor Saunders from comment #1)
> The following patch compiles with 4.9 for me, but I don't have easy
> access to a machine with 4.5 on it, would you mind testing if it works
> for you?
Applied th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61679
--- Comment #3 from Trevor Saunders ---
> (In reply to Trevor Saunders from comment #1)
> > The following patch compiles with 4.9 for me, but I don't have easy
> > access to a machine with 4.5 on it, would you mind testing if it works
> > for you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61679
--- Comment #4 from Gary Funck ---
Created attachment 33076
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33076&action=edit
make log after trying patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61679
--- Comment #5 from Gary Funck ---
(In reply to Trevor Saunders from comment #3)
> Is the below list complete? I'd expect to see
> errors for the partial specialization for true as well.
Attached the full make log.
24 matches
Mail list logo
