https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61718
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> default <nothing> hidden
Simple since YYY is hidden (by the paragma), XXX<YYY*> has to be also hidden
because there is no way to export the class XXX<YYY*> since it depends on the
visibility of YYY. If you think it should have been visible, then you will can
get an One definition rule violation if another shared library has a class
named YYY.
