https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61285
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58670
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489
--- Comment #3 from Deniz Bahadir ---
Thanks for the comment.
So, at least we aggree that the cases for addr2 and addr6 should not warn (in
C++11) as it initializes all values. Possibly this holds true for addr9, too?
I always thought that the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61494
Bug ID: 61494
Summary: -fsignaling-nans not taken into account for x - 0.0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58670
--- Comment #8 from David ---
I can confirm what Kai had to say in comment 7. Using a newer build resolves
both the original problem reported by Jakub and the problem I saw in comment 5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Deniz Bahadir from comment #3)
> Thanks for the comment.
>
> So, at least we aggree that the cases for addr2 and addr6 should not warn
> (in C++11) as it initializes all values.
No, that's no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61494
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61493
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61487
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61487
--- Comment #4 from Rose Garcia ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> What mips target triplet exactly?
mips-linux-musl
(using the patches/buildscripts from https://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-cross,
as musl support has still not be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58670
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50580
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49456
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49455
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48321
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48340
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59535
--- Comment #19 from ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com ---
On 06/12/14 08:46, fredrik.hederstie...@securitas-direct.com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59535
>
> Fredrik Hederstierna changed:
>
> What|Remo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47683
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47406
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47405
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46660
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46610
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22006
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54448
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50631
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48251
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44424
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39951
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35211
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34520
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61269
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jun 13 11:59:22 2014
New Revision: 211636
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211636&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-13 Jonathan Wakely
Backport from mainline
PR libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60326
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jun 13 11:59:22 2014
New Revision: 211636
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211636&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-13 Jonathan Wakely
Backport from mainline
PR libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60326
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61495
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61495
Bug ID: 61495
Summary: [4.10 regression] Many Go tests FAIL with fatal error:
runtime.SetFinalizer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61496
Bug ID: 61496
Summary: [4.10 regression] Many Go tests FAIL with ld warning
about go$zerovalue
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61496
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61497
Bug ID: 61497
Summary: [4.10 regression] Many Go tests FAIL with fatal error:
all goroutines are asleep - deadlock!
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61497
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61498
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61498
Bug ID: 61498
Summary: [4.10 regression] Many 64-bit Go tests SEGV in
scanblock
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61498
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jun 13 13:50:13 2014
New Revision: 211639
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211639&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/61498
runtime: Always set gcnext_sp to pointer-aligned ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #29 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jun 13 13:56:14 2014
New Revision: 211640
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211640&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/52583
runtime: Stop backtrace at a few recognized functi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61498
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53696
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini ---
By the way, in mainline I can't reproduce this anymore.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61186
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Jun 13 14:26:51 2014
New Revision: 211641
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211641&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-13 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/61186
* ipa-devirt.c (possib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61186
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Jun 13 14:34:14 2014
New Revision: 211646
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211646&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-13 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/61186
* ipa-devirt.c (possib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61186
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
Bug ID: 61499
Summary: Internal read of negative integer broken in 4.9.0 on
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58067
Teresa Johnson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tejohnson at google dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61500
Bug ID: 61500
Summary: [C++11] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Can't take pointer to
member referenced via member pointer template
parameter.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61493
Paul Pluzhnikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppluzhnikov at google dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61501
Bug ID: 61501
Summary: spurious conversion warning with -Wconversion when
calling isnan(double x)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: mino
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51980
christophe.lyon at st dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christophe.lyon at st dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61502
Bug ID: 61502
Summary: == comparison on "one-past" pointer gives wrong result
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54173
Pawel Sikora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60731
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Dave Johansen from comment #11)
> Can this please be reopened? It was determined in the glibc bugzilla that
> this is a gcc problem because of the incorrect setting of unique flag.
The setting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61493
--- Comment #3 from wmi at google dot com ---
Fix a typo in the first post.
$~/workarea/gcc-r211604/build/install/bin/g++ -O2 1.cxx
$./a.out
not equal
$~/workarea/gcc-r211604/build/install/bin/g++ -O0 1.cxx
$./a.out
equal
$~/workarea/gcc-r21160
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60731
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 13 16:39:37 2014
New Revision: 211648
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211648&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/60731
* common.opt (-fno-gnu-unique): Add.
* config/el
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61094
--- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Jun 13 16:40:48 2014
New Revision: 211649
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211649&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-13 Jeff Law
PR rtl-optimization/61094
PR rtl-optimizat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61446
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Jun 13 16:40:48 2014
New Revision: 211649
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211649&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-13 Jeff Law
PR rtl-optimization/61094
PR rtl-optimizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61423
Bug 61423 depends on bug 61446, which changed state.
Bug 61446 Summary: [4.10 Regression]: ICE in copyprop_hardreg_forward_1, at
regcprop.c with -O2 -m32 -march=corei7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61446
What|Remove
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61446
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61503
Bug ID: 61503
Summary: RTL representation of i386 shrdl instruction is
incorrect?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61094
--- Comment #18 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Jun 13 16:50:10 2014
New Revision: 211652
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211652&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-13 Jeff Law
PR rtl-optimization/61094
PR rtl-optimizat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61094
--- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Jun 13 16:50:01 2014
New Revision: 211651
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211651&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/61094
* ree.c (combine_reaching_defs): Do not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61446
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Jun 13 16:50:10 2014
New Revision: 211652
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211652&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-13 Jeff Law
PR rtl-optimization/61094
PR rtl-optimizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61094
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61504
Bug ID: 61504
Summary: Move elision after cast to rvalue reference
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61505
Bug ID: 61505
Summary: [4.10 Regression] bootstrap broken by ada/gnat_rm.texi
after r211448
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53696
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61415
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Fri Jun 13 18:42:53 2014
New Revision: 211653
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211653&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/61415
* config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin.def (BU_MISC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61505
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61500
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61488
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61502
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Just because two pointers print the same and have the same bit-pattern
doesn't mean they need to compare equal (see the response to DR#260, which
may be presumed to apply to C11 in the abse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61505
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> This was an oversight, fixed right after.
Fixed by what? bootstrapping r211652 with Ada is failing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61505
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57573
Richard Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57644
Richard Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61402
Richard Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61388
--- Comment #3 from Michael Eager ---
What sources are you building?
When I build --target=microblaze-xilinx-elf from the current sources, I see the
same warning message for microblaze.md that you list. I do not see the other
errors. Constra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61484
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61488
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61500
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61502
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61415
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Fri Jun 13 21:56:16 2014
New Revision: 211656
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211656&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2014-06-13 Peter Bergner
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61415
--- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Fri Jun 13 21:58:49 2014
New Revision: 211657
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211657&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2014-06-13 Peter Bergner
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58704
Paul Pluzhnikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppluzhnikov at google dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61506
Bug ID: 61506
Summary: ICE [4.10 Regression] triggered by solution to #61446
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61506
Jürgen Reuter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61506
--- Comment #1 from Jürgen Reuter ---
This is the author of the package: andy.buck...@cern.ch
With version 6.1.2 of LHAPDF I get the error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61496
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jun 13 22:30:47 2014
New Revision: 211658
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211658&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/61496
* gospec.c (lang_specific_driver): On Solaris,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61496
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489
--- Comment #5 from Deniz Bahadir ---
Thanks again.
Then I need to appologize for misunderstanding the meaning of the warning-flag.
Because of several internet-sources, like the one I cited, I always thought
that the cases of addr3 and addr7 wer
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo