https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61283
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56274
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61284
Bug ID: 61284
Summary: non_overridable produces segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61284
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
--- Comment #31 from Torbjörn Gard ---
This worked for me.
Thanks a lot :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61285
Bug ID: 61285
Summary: GCC version 4.7.x 4.8.x 4.9.x does not compile working
ARM code for the AT24 EEPROM driver under Linux 3.6.x
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 22 12:17:15 2014
New Revision: 210804
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210804&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
cp:
PR c/61271
* cp-array-notation.c (cilkplus_an_triplet_types_ok
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61285
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61286
Bug ID: 61286
Summary: internal compiler error -fcilkplus
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58638
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Seems unlikely, but if -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ gives you a runtime
dependency on GCC then that should be reported as a bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61249
--- Comment #5 from Michael Tautschnig ---
Created attachment 32843
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32843&action=edit
Update documentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
Paul Eggert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32832|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61233
Pedro Alves changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||palves at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61231
--- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner ---
Looking at some stage2 and stage3 obj files that Matthias sent me, there are
actual code differences between the stage2 and stage3 compiles. The following
code shows one example. The difference seems to be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61208
--- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Thu May 22 15:38:51 2014
New Revision: 210812
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210812&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/61208
* arm.md (arm_cmpdi_unsigned): Fix length cal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61208
--- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Thu May 22 15:39:46 2014
New Revision: 210813
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210813&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/61208
* arm.md (arm_cmpdi_unsigned): Fix length cal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61208
--- Comment #7 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Thu May 22 15:54:28 2014
New Revision: 210814
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210814&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/61208
* arm.md (arm_cmpdi_unsigned): Fix length cal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61208
--- Comment #8 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Thu May 22 15:56:34 2014
New Revision: 210816
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210816&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/61208
* arm.md (arm_cmpdi_unsigned): Fix length cal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61208
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61231
--- Comment #12 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #11)
> Vlad, can you think of any way that your change might affect this? It seems
> suspicious that your patch forces some pseudos to memory similar to what we
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61287
Bug ID: 61287
Summary: "error: ‘nios2_fpu_insn_enabled’ was not declared in
this scope" when building with ada
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61287
--- Comment #1 from Dave Malcolm ---
Also seen with --target=nios2-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60901
--- Comment #6 from Ryan Hill ---
And you're leaving 4.8/4.9 broken?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61288
Bug ID: 61288
Summary: valgrind finds problem in build_conditional_expr_1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60925
Aaro Koskinen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.8.3
--- Comment #3 from Aaro Koskinen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
--- Comment #32 from François Bissey ---
Successfully built on AIX 5.3.0. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60969
--- Comment #27 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu May 22 21:09:59 2014
New Revision: 210824
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210824&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-22 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/60969
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60969
--- Comment #28 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu May 22 21:10:26 2014
New Revision: 210825
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210825&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-22 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/60969
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61289
Bug ID: 61289
Summary: Bad jump threading generates infinite loop
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60324
--- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Thu May 22 21:17:29 2014
New Revision: 210827
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210827&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 60324 Handle long path names, don't use PATH_MAX.
2014-05-23 Janne Blom
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61289
Paul Pluzhnikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppluzhnikov at google dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61088
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu May 22 22:28:24 2014
New Revision: 210829
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210829&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-05-22 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/61088
* lambda.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61088
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61290
Bug ID: 61290
Summary: init templated member variable with constructor fails
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61231
--- Comment #13 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Fri May 23 01:17:41 2014
New Revision: 210835
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210835&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/61231
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (mem_operand_gpr): Handle S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61231
--- Comment #14 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Fri May 23 01:24:08 2014
New Revision: 210836
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210836&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/61231
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (mem_operand_gpr): Handle S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61231
--- Comment #15 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Fri May 23 01:28:23 2014
New Revision: 210837
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210837&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/61231
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (mem_operand_gpr): Handle S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61215
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri May 23 01:52:01 2014
New Revision: 210838
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210838&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-22 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/61215
* l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61215
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri May 23 01:52:28 2014
New Revision: 210839
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210839&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-22 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/61215
* l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54733
--- Comment #3 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Fri May 23 03:33:28 2014
New Revision: 210843
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210843&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-23 Thomas Preud'homme
PR tree-optimization/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58638
--- Comment #8 from Daniel Richard G. ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> Seems unlikely, but if -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ gives you a runtime
> dependency on GCC then that should be reported as a bug.
I tried a 4.9.0 buil
101 - 141 of 141 matches
Mail list logo