https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61231
--- Comment #12 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #11) > Vlad, can you think of any way that your change might affect this? It seems > suspicious that your patch forces some pseudos to memory similar to what we > are seeing here. > Sorry, for the troubles. I believe now it might affect. People have also problem with aarch64 after the patch. I am working on it. If I do not solve the problem soon, I'll revert the patch.
