[Bug bootstrap/60830] New: ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 Bug ID: 60830 Summary: ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug c/60831] gcc-4.8.2 creates binaries with broken AVX support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60831 --- Comment #1 from mmokrejs at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 32589 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32589&action=edit Code generated through cython

[Bug c/60831] New: gcc-4.8.2 creates binaries with broken AVX support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60831 Bug ID: 60831 Summary: gcc-4.8.2 creates binaries with broken AVX support Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug bootstrap/60830] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 Denis Excoffier changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i686-pc-cygwin Host|

[Bug fortran/58085] Wrong indexing of an array in ASSOCIATE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58085 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Apr 13 11:55:49 2014 New Revision: 209346 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209346&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-13 Paul Thomas PR fortran/58085 PR fortran/60717 * tra

[Bug fortran/60717] Wrong code with recursive procedure with unlimited polymorphic dummy argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60717 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Apr 13 11:55:49 2014 New Revision: 209346 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209346&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-13 Paul Thomas PR fortran/58085 PR fortran/60717 * tra

[Bug fortran/58085] Wrong indexing of an array in ASSOCIATE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58085 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Apr 13 11:58:55 2014 New Revision: 209347 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209347&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-13 Paul Thomas PR fortran/58085 PR fortran/60717 * tra

[Bug fortran/60717] Wrong code with recursive procedure with unlimited polymorphic dummy argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60717 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Apr 13 11:58:55 2014 New Revision: 209347 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209347&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-13 Paul Thomas PR fortran/58085 PR fortran/60717 * tra

[Bug bootstrap/60830] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson --- I'm getting a different error bootstrapping the 4.9.0 RC on Cygwin: checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: in `/home/mikpe/objdir/i686-pc-cygwin/libgcc': configure: error:

[Bug c/60831] gcc-4.8.2 creates binaries with broken AVX support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60831 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to mmokrejs from comment #0) > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca > cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx > pdpe1gb rdtscp lm

[Bug c/60831] gcc-4.8.2 creates binaries with broken AVX support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60831 mmokrejs at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug c/58988] -Werror=missing-include-dirs does not work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58988 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/60784] Spurious -Wmissing-field-initializers warning for anonymous structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60784 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug middle-end/60832] New: add pretty-printer code for double-int/wide-int

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60832 Bug ID: 60832 Summary: add pretty-printer code for double-int/wide-int Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: m

[Bug debug/60833] New: Inheritance via typedef skips the typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60833 Bug ID: 60833 Summary: Inheritance via typedef skips the typedef Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug c++/99] Bug in template type in error message.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99 --- Comment #20 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Wolfgang Bangerth from comment #11) > Here's another very nice example from PR 20313: > - > template struct s; > template s::s(int j) {} > -

[Bug c/50459] alignof doesn't work on plain old constant, works with expressions containing it

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50459 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/99] Bug in template type in error message.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Co

[Bug c/53063] encode group options in the .opt files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53063 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/60834] New: [OOP] ICE with ASSOCIATE construct (gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1721)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60834 Bug ID: 60834 Summary: [OOP] ICE with ASSOCIATE construct (gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1721) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywor

[Bug rtl-optimization/60663] [4.9 Regression] Errors out on valid inline asm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60663 --- Comment #4 from Launchpad --- Arnd Bergmann added the following comment to Launchpad bug report 1296942: Looks good now, I have resumed ARM kernel build testing with gcc-4.9 now and don't see this any more. There is one new bug that came up i

[Bug c++/99] Bug in template type in error message.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c/50459] alignof doesn't work on plain old constant, works with expressions containing it

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50459 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1) > The problem on the C side of things is that the values of the enum are > represented by CONST_DECL nodes and check_user_alignment doesn't look > through it. So mayb

[Bug plugins/59335] Plugin doesn't build on trunk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59335 --- Comment #18 from PaX Team --- found another missing header not installed for plugins: stmt.h (seemingly it was split off from tree.h which has always been exported, so this probably counts as a regression).

[Bug plugins/59335] Plugin doesn't build on trunk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59335 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug c++/60835] New: Please support __attribute__((format_arg)) on class types as well as char*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60835 Bug ID: 60835 Summary: Please support __attribute__((format_arg)) on class types as well as char* Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enh

[Bug libstdc++/60662] simple use of call_once throws a system_error exception, but not if sleep_for is called beforehand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60662 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- -lpthread (or more correctly, -pthread) should cause the executable to link to libpthread.so for pthread_once, but for some reason on your system is preferring the weak pthread_once symbol found in libc.so a

[Bug libstdc++/60793] Add target *-*-dragonfly* to dg-options on 172 libstdc++ tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60793 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #2) > hmmm, that would imply that all the dragonfly patches that we've been > carrying for years (including ada patches) would need to go in first. I don't see why ada

[Bug libstdc++/60793] Add target *-*-dragonfly* to dg-options on 172 libstdc++ tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60793 --- Comment #4 from John Marino --- For the matter of this particular PR, NetBSD is also a target so it's not a big stretch to imagine it's needed for all the BSD targets (and it is). Plus there's really no downside if the target isn't really rec

[Bug c/58988] -Werror=missing-include-dirs does not work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58988 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/51303] -Wmissing-include-dirs warnings reported as [enabled by default]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51303 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzilla@poradnik-webmaster

[Bug c++/60836] New: [4.9 Regression] invalid PHI argument and ICE in verify_gimple

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60836 Bug ID: 60836 Summary: [4.9 Regression] invalid PHI argument and ICE in verify_gimple Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/59778] FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59778 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |testsuite --- Comment #2 from John Da

[Bug target/60818] ICE in validate_condition_mode on powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.9.0 |unknown Known to fail|

[Bug c/60837] New: initializer element is not constant: int test = (1, 2) + 1;

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60837 Bug ID: 60837 Summary: initializer element is not constant: int test = (1, 2) + 1; Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Pr

[Bug c/60837] initializer element is not constant: int test = (1, 2) + 1;

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60837 ilya changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/60838] New: bugos warning: initializer element is not a constant expression: int test = (0 ? (1,0) : 0) + 1;

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60838 Bug ID: 60838 Summary: bugos warning: initializer element is not a constant expression: int test = (0 ? (1,0) : 0) + 1; Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/60838] bugos warning: initializer element is not a constant expression: int test = (0 ? (1,0) : 0) + 1;

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60838 --- Comment #1 from ilya --- Another testcase: main.c - int test1 = (0 ? 0 : 0) + 1; int test2 = (0 ? (3, 0) : 0) + 1; int test3[(0 ? 0 : 0) + 1]; int test4[(0 ? (3, 0) : 0) + 1]; int main( void ) { return 0; } -