http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60565
Bug ID: 60565
Summary: Bogus not-in-scope error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #22 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #19 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
>> > write(*,"(en15.1)") 9.4905_16
>> > end
>>
>> 9.4E+00
>
> So the test fails due to a bug in the rounding of real(16) in yo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60565
--- Comment #1 from patrick at parcs dot ath.cx ---
Er, sorry, the call to "foo ()" within main ought to be "B::foo ()".
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #23 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I'm not sure that's the problem: AFAICS snprintf is only used by
> io/write_float.def (output_float:734) to print the exponent, the rest is
> handled by quadmath_snprintf.
The failing tests assume r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60565
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to patrick from comment #0)
> $ g++ -c exc.C
> exc.C:8:26: warning: declaration of ‘void B::foo()’ with C language linkage
> [enabled by default]
> extern "C" void foo ();
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60565
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to patrick from comment #1)
> Er, sorry, the call to "foo ()" within main ought to be "B::foo ()".
OK, in that case you need to fix the declaration of B::foo() if you want to
call it. I think G++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60559
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60559
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55896
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> you could just use w_strlen (contents_1 + 1) and the warning could go away.
This causes that two warnings are emitted :(. If strlen can't be used (ugh),
then e.g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60565
--- Comment #4 from patrick at parcs dot ath.cx ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> (In reply to patrick from comment #1)
> > Er, sorry, the call to "foo ()" within main ought to be "B::foo ()".
>
> OK, in that case you need to fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60459
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Raghu from comment #3)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > Can you try a newer version than GCC 4.2.1?
> >
> > Also can you provide the exact options you compiled your source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59543
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
I think 2) is the issue, so does
Index: lto-streamer-in.c
===
--- lto-streamer-in.c (revision 208642)
+++ lto-streamer-in.c (working copy)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60562
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59543
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
I'm doing a LTO profiledbootstrap with this - Markus, can you check if this
fixes your problem?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59487
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60535
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 18 14:56:23 2014
New Revision: 208651
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208651&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/60535
* ubsan.c (ubsan_type_descriptor, ubsan_create_da
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60535
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60557
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 18 15:05:30 2014
New Revision: 208652
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208652&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/60557
* ubsan.c (ubsan_instrument_unreachable): Call
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60557
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60438
--- Comment #39 from linzj ---
(In reply to Richard Henderson from comment #35)
thanks for the fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60562
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60553
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Patches helped me!
First one was sufficient for my simplified case (~800 files), but it was
necessary to add second one for chromium.
Will you add this changes to mainline or should I create a patch?
Thanks,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60507
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #3)
> The patch in comment #2 ICEs on this extended test case:
Here is a better patch which works on comment 2:
Index: gcc/fortran/interface.c
=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60550
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60562
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
BTW, it is actually 4 tests in excess-precision-3.c that fail now:
if ((float)i1 != 0x1.0p30f)
abort ();
if ((float)u1 != 0x1.0p31f)
abort ();
if ((float)ll1 != 0x1.0p62f)
abort ();
...
if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60565
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57703
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Hm, it looks that there's an usage of top-level function chromium binary:
/tmp/cckAZyDK.ltrans26.ltrans.o:cckAZyDK.ltrans26.o:function
sandbox::Die::ExitGroup(): error: undefined reference to 'SyscallAsm'
/tmp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60566
Bug ID: 60566
Summary: [4.9 Regression] r208573 miscompiles kdelibs
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60305
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
Let's add the testcase to mainline and close this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60564
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Mar 18 16:30:28 2014
New Revision: 208655
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208655&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/60564
* include/std/future (__future_base::_Task_state
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60564
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Mar 18 16:31:38 2014
New Revision: 208656
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208656&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/60564
* include/std/future (__future_base::_Task_state
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60564
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57485
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
--- Comment #2 from Marek Pola
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60223
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
Marek, are you sure about r180707 ?!? It's supposed to be only about command
line options names... Please confirm and in case CC Jason.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57485
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60528
--- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey ---
An additional data point, If I build a MIPS cross compiler as a 32 bit x86
object then it does the right thing, if I build the cross compiler as a 64 bit
object then I get incorrect results. The 4.8.1 compiler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54250
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
This is fixed in mainline and 4.8.2, and I'm adding the testcase and closing
the bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60223
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Ah, no, that's bogus, with -std=c++0x it ICEs even before that revision.
Re-bisecting...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60305
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Mar 18 17:10:23 2014
New Revision: 208658
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208658&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-18 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/60305
* g++.dg/cpp0x/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54250
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Mar 18 17:10:23 2014
New Revision: 208658
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208658&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-18 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/60305
* g++.dg/cpp0x/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #24 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Rainer,
can you test the following patch?
--- _clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fmt_en.f902014-03-04
17:51:04.0 +0100
+++ work/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fmt_en.f902014-03-18 18:08:22.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54250
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60305
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60419
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60567
Bug ID: 60567
Summary: lto1 ICE in add_symbol_to_partition, at
lto/lto-partition.c:233
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60419
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
A bit more reduced:
markus@x4 tmp % cat test.ii
namespace poses
{
}
namespace utils
{
using namespace poses;
}
namespace poses
{
class J
{
public:
J ();
virtual void m_fn1 (int &p1, int);
};
class
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56356
Andris Pavenis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andris.pavenis at iki dot fi
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46800
--- Comment #5 from mikael.morin at sfr dot fr ---
Le 18/03/2014 02:28, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org a écrit :
> PR libfortran/58324
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60223
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
So, started with r166167. Before that I see:
$ ./cc1plus-166166 -std=c++0x -quiet ~/x.C
/home/polacek/x.C: In function ‘void bar()’:
/home/polacek/x.C:7:13: error: ‘'\000'’ is not a valid template argument fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60303
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56922
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60329
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Patch was posted to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg01418.html
I don't think we need a license on that file. It certainly shouldn't have
Nathan and Diego's names copied from another file.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51474
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58704
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a.matveyakin at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60386
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
ale=gnu --enable-multilib --disable-altivec --disable-fixed-point
--enable-targets=all --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-libgomp --enable-lto
--with-cloog --disable-isl-version-check
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0-alpha20140317 20140318 (experimental) [trunk revision 208641]
(Gentoo 4.9.0_alpha20140317)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60569
Bug ID: 60569
Summary: Segfault with -flto and -fsanitize=undefined
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56356
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55383
--- Comment #14 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Author: manu
Date: Tue Mar 18 19:58:39 2014
New Revision: 208661
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208661&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-18 Manuel López-Ibáñez
PR c/55383
c/
* c-typeck.c:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60562
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson ---
Author: rth
Date: Tue Mar 18 19:59:54 2014
New Revision: 208662
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208662&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/60562
* config/i386/i386.md (*float2_i387): Move down t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56356
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Tue Mar 18 20:02:54 2014
New Revision: 208663
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208663&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/56356
* sdbout.c (sdbout_parms): Verify that parms'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55383
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56356
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Tue Mar 18 20:06:37 2014
New Revision: 208664
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208664&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/56356
* sdbout.c (sdbout_parms): Verify that parms'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56356
--- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Tue Mar 18 20:08:03 2014
New Revision: 208665
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208665&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/56356
* sdbout.c (sdbout_parms): Verify that parms'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56356
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60570
Bug ID: 60570
Summary: expression in 'elif' directive mis-diagnosed as error
when group will be skipped
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60570
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Dup of 19040?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60562
--- Comment #6 from Richard Henderson ---
Author: rth
Date: Tue Mar 18 20:24:29 2014
New Revision: 208666
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208666&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/60562
* config/i386/i386.md (*float2_sse): Check
X8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60562
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60570
--- Comment #2 from seb.grindle at gmail dot com ---
19040 was sort of the opposite. Here we shouldn't get a error but do; there the
report was of the form "this should produce a diagostic but doesn't"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60571
Bug ID: 60571
Summary: FTBFS on hurd-i386
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60054
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60332
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59114
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60555
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60572
Bug ID: 60572
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE deriving from class with invalid
member
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery, ice
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60572
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.0, 4.6.0, 4.7.0, 4.8.0
Target Mil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60573
Bug ID: 60573
Summary: [c++1y] ICE with defining generic function of nested
class in class scope
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60574
Bug ID: 60574
Summary: [4.9 Regression] [c++1y] ICE with deduced return type
in virtual function and LTO
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60574
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60562
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Fixed.
Thanks for the quick fix!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60575
Bug ID: 60575
Summary: inefficient vectorization of compare into bytes on
amd64
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60570
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/dr_412.htm gives an
approved change (presumably to appear in C11 TC2) to stop #elif
conditionals from being evaluated when they don't need to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55207
--- Comment #17 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Mar 18 22:15:10 2014
New Revision: 208668
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208668&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-18 Janus Weil
PR fortran/55207
PR fortran/605
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60549
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Mar 18 22:15:10 2014
New Revision: 208668
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208668&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-18 Janus Weil
PR fortran/55207
PR fortran/6054
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55207
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 55207, which changed state.
Bug 55207 Summary: [F08] Variables declared in the main program should
implicitly get the SAVE attribute
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55207
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60563
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
If I replace everywhere int64 with int_64, the test compiles with -m64 and the
failing tests are
t3();
t4();
t5();
t6();
t9();
t10();
t11();
t12();
t16();
only with -m64, and
t17(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60576
Bug ID: 60576
Summary: [4.9 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_7.f90
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55383
--- Comment #16 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
It seems the patch was not tested in C++:
Tests that now fail, but worked before:
unix//-m32: c-c++-common/Wcast-qual-1.c -std=gnu++11 (test for warnings, line
88)
unix//-m32: c-c++-common/Wcast-qual
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55383
--- Comment #17 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Author: manu
Date: Tue Mar 18 23:22:02 2014
New Revision: 208669
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208669&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-19 Manuel López-Ibáñez
PR c/55383
* gcc.dg/cast-qu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60573
Adam Butcher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46800
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Revision: 208629
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Wed Mar 19 01:28:28 2014
--
--- svn:log (original
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58324
--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Revision: 208629
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Wed Mar 19 01:28:28 2014
--
--- svn:log (origina
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54316
Howard Hinnant changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howard.hinnant at gmail dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #25 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #21)
> > We can xfail the test case if we are certain of the problem.
>
> What I don't see is how to xfail only some tests for real(16). Anyway,
> Rainer could
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60577
Bug ID: 60577
Summary: inefficient FDO instrumentation code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimiza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60563
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Mar 19 03:38:21 2014
New Revision: 208674
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208674&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/60563
* g++.dg/ext/sync-4.C (int32_t): Remove typed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60563
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #3 fro
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
