http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60565
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-03-18
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes, the current behaviour is certainly not consistent.
Clang warns about the missing exception-specification but allows B::foo() to be
called, as you expect.
