http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58011
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
Is this done? If so, can we close this PR?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60363
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60360
--- Comment #6 from DaBler ---
When I call sizeof(...) on the int type (instead of a variable), it is the
same:
typedef int TypeInt __attribute((aligned(64)));
printf("%zu %zu\n", sizeof(TypeInt), alignof(TypeInt)); // Output: 4 64
Moreover, It
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55113
--- Comment #16 from pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14)
>
> Well. At least to my theory (didn't try).
>
Theory and practice match. It seems to fix the bug and work fine. I will do
some further testing an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60364
Bug ID: 60364
Summary: [[noreturn]] specified for second declaration but not
first doesn't result in a diagnostic
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60365
Bug ID: 60365
Summary: multiple noreturn attribute specifiers in single
declaration doesn't result in a diagnostic
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60306
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #4)
> OK, I am re-considering my decision to not assign this to Martin.
> The problem is the following. We have call:
>
> struct Box x;
> ...
> x = edges_connecting
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60306
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Of course the bug seems to be
static bool
stmt_may_be_vtbl_ptr_store (gimple stmt)
{
if (is_gimple_call (stmt))
return false;
^^^
this. I remember being very curious when seeing this ;)
Please at th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57232
--- Comment #20 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Feb 28 12:45:36 2014
New Revision: 208219
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208219&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/57232
* var-tracking.c (vt_initialize): Apply the same conditio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59992
--- Comment #11 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Feb 28 12:57:06 2014
New Revision: 208220
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208220&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/59992
* cselib.c (remove_useless_values): Skip to avoid quadrat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59992
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57232
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60280
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 28 13:14:23 2014
New Revision: 208222
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208222&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-28 Richard Biener
PR target/60280
* tree-cfgcleanup.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59992
--- Comment #12 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Feb 28 12:57:40 2014
New Revision: 208221
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208221&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/59992
* cselib.c (cselib_hasher::equal): Special-case VALUE loo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787
--- Comment #18 from Igor Zamyatin ---
Martin,
I checked the patch and can confirm it gives necessary speedup on the test
(UMTmk_1.1)
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60366
Bug ID: 60366
Summary: ICE with self-invoking lambdas
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60359
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59176
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60314
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Feb 28 16:51:21 2014
New Revision: 208225
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208225&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-25 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/60314
* dwarf2out.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60314
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60150
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
--- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka ---
It is a speculative devirtualization; we see no other option than B, so we try
to inline it. Speculative devirtualization already has logic in it so it won't
pick method without definition (it also will pick if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60367
Bug ID: 60367
Summary: Default argument object is not getting constructed
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60357
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59176
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka ---
hmm, I see, same body alias...
Well, remove_unreachable_nodes does two things, it removes nodes that are
completely unreachable and also removes definitions of nodes where definition
is not needed, but they ar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60359
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #4)
> This is due to a small bug in find_intrinsic_vtab. Patch:
The patch from comment #4 regtests cleanly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60359
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 05:36:54PM +, janus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60359
>
> --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to janus from comme
et: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --enable-languages=c++,lto
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20140228 (experimental) [trunk revision 208224] (GCC)
$ ./xgcc -B. -fexec-charset=UTF-16 ~/ice.c
/home/ryan/ice.c: In function ‘main’:
/home/ryan/ice.c:9:0: internal comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
--- Comment #19 from Jason Merrill ---
I think it would make sense to suppress speculative devirtualization of a
DECL_ARTIFICIAL destructor, since that seems to be the problem here (and in
53808). I think it's better to address this in devirtuali
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60368
--- Comment #1 from Ryan Mansfield ---
Maybe a WONTFIX. It's not clear to me why cpp_host_to_exec_charset is using
CPP_DL_ICE for this instead of CPP_DL_ERROR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51483
--- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Eric, there's an updated patch in c#8 which reportedly fixes the problem by
passing both the precision and storage size of Register_Float_Type.
I'm nowhere near versed enough in Ada to know if Mikael's on t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60369
Bug ID: 60369
Summary: [PATCH] [TIC6X] new compiler intrinsics
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60370
Bug ID: 60370
Summary: TRANSPOSE on rhs of allocatable array assignment gives
bounds error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58610
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Feb 28 20:20:21 2014
New Revision: 208226
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208226&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-02-28 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58610
* cp-tree.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58610
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 58610, which changed state.
Bug 58610 Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with constexpr of class
with template constructor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58610
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60306
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
Created attachment 32235
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32235&action=edit
Better WIP patch
Yep, ignoring the calls also surprised me. I spent some time trying to think of
and produce more e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57295
Wojciech Migda changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wojtek.golf at interia dot pl
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60359
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Fri Feb 28 21:30:04 2014
New Revision: 208227
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208227&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-28 Janus Weil
PR fortran/60359
* class.c (find
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60359
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60371
Bug ID: 60371
Summary: std::vector::emplace_back
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51483
--- Comment #18 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Eric, there's an updated patch in c#8 which reportedly fixes the problem by
> passing both the precision and storage size of Register_Float_Type.
Right, this is the way to go.
> I'm nowhere near versed en
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60371
Дилян Палаузов changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dilyan.palauzov at aegee dot
org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32039
--- Comment #2 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Stubbs from comment #0)
> The problem should be that B::foo hides A::foo from class C. Clause 7.3.3/14
> of the C++ standard says the using declaration should not work, in this c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32039
--- Comment #3 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Eelis from comment #1)
> Still accepted by 4.4. Comeau concurs with reporter, and rejects saying:
>
> line 15: error: class member designated by a
> using-declaration must be vis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32039
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60166
--- Comment #3 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jye2
Date: Fri Feb 28 21:53:40 2014
New Revision: 208229
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208229&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-28 Joey Ye
PR libgcc/60166
* config/arm/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60372
Bug ID: 60372
Summary: incorrect destruction order for function parameter
objects
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60371
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This sounds like there is a copy constructor happening and you don't have a
copy constructor defined so it is a direct assignment which means you will get
a double free.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60166
--- Comment #4 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jye2
Date: Fri Feb 28 22:00:52 2014
New Revision: 208230
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208230&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-28 Joey Ye
Backport from mainline r208229
2014-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60166
Joey Ye changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60166
--- Comment #6 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jye2
Date: Fri Feb 28 22:05:13 2014
New Revision: 208233
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208233&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-28 Joey Ye
Backport from mainline r208229
2014-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60371
--- Comment #3 from Дилян Палаузов ---
Indeed, adding
z (const z& x) { var = strdup (x.var); }
solves the problem. However, I don't understand how that "y.clear();" between
the y.emplace_back() in the original program avoids the double free.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60371
Дилян Палаузов changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60373
Bug ID: 60373
Summary: half warning: visibility attribute ignored because it
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60190
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60374
Bug ID: 60374
Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid template
specialization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60374
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.0, 4.6.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32039
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60375
Bug ID: 60375
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid use of lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code
Severi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60375
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.0, 4.6.0, 4.7.0, 4.8.0
Target Mil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
--- Comment #20 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Mar 1 00:17:09 2014
New Revision: 208241
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208241&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/58678
* ipa-devirt.c (ipa_devirt): Don't choose an implicitl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60376
Bug ID: 60376
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid use of using
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code
Severit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60376
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60305
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60377
Bug ID: 60377
Summary: [c++1y] ICE with invalid function parameter in
conjunction with auto parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32039
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|IN
68 matches
Mail list logo
