http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32039
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|INVALID |---
--- Comment #6 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Harald van Dijk from comment #5)
[...]
> Your comment (the "In the example above, A (from using A::foo) is visible"
> bit) suggests that you read the standard as requiring that the base class be
> visible, rather than the base class member.
Obviously should read members of A are visible... Anyway thanks for the
clarification.
