http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
--- Comment #15 from Uroš Bizjak ---
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 6:54 AM, pa...@matos-sorge.com
wrote:
> --- Comment #14 from Paulo J. Matos ---
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #13)
>> (In reply to Paulo J. Matos from comment #9)
>>
>> > Unf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57554
--- Comment #2 from Igor Zamyatin ---
Seems the test is ok now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58886
Tim Shen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||timshen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58978
Bug ID: 58978
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-opti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58977
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think this is
http://www.open-std.org/Jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#1288 which makes
this a duplicate of PR 50025
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57086
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dilyan.palauzov at aegee dot
org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58976
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58978
octoploid at yandex dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drtwox at gmail dot com
--- Comment #13 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58977
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58886
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
Do we have any idea about Visual C++ and clang++? If this kind of extension is
really popular we may want to include it under gnu++11 only, like we did
another time.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52015
Keith Marshall changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m8r-iv55ri at mailinator dot
com
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52015
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cgf at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52015
--- Comment #28 from Kai Tietz ---
Nobody restricts here any communications. The description in comment #15 is
right now describing just the facts. That nobody of the mingw.org team is
active on gcc-upstream, is for sure not gcc's community prob
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52015
--- Comment #29 from Keith Marshall ---
(In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #28)
> Nobody restricts here any communications. The description in comment #15 is
> right now describing just the facts. That nobody of the mingw.org team is
> active o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58972
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58979
Bug ID: 58979
Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid use of
pointer-to-member
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58980
Bug ID: 58980
Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid enum
declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38313
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58939
--- Comment #1 from chaselton ---
UPDATE:
Thanks to Jonathan Wakely and Ian Taylor for providing the codefixes.
This bug is resolved by adding the following to files.c
in lines 715-726:
if (regular && total != size && STAT_SIZE_RELIABLE (file-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58981
Bug ID: 58981
Summary: [4.9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/memset-1.c
execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54236
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo ---
Created attachment 31144
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31144&action=edit
stitching addc insns
The attached patch is an example that shows how widening additions can be
stitched together. On
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58981
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58965
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58982
Bug ID: 58982
Summary: [4.9 Regression] std::vector>
vai(10); does not compile anymore
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52015
--- Comment #30 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Keith Marshall from comment #29)
> Granted, MinGW.org could be more forthcoming in appointing a
> project liaison, but given this level of arrogant abuse, is it any wonder
> that none is steppi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52015
--- Comment #31 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Or to put it another way, this bug only affects MinGW users, is blocked by a
limitation in MinGW, and noone from MinGW has offered to do anything about it,
but you're pointing fingers at GCC devs and saying
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54236
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #6)
> Created attachment 31144 [details]
> stitching addc insns
>
> The attached patch is an example that shows how widening additions can be
> stitched together. One applicat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58981
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
The bug is in
*count = expand_simple_binop (GET_MODE (*count), PLUS, *count,
saveddest, *count, 1, OPTAB_DIRECT);
(gdb) call debug_rtx (saveddest)
(reg:SI 101)
(gdb) call
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58690
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Nov 3 22:22:22 2013
New Revision: 204338
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204338&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Truncate x32 DImode TLS address to a SImode register
gcc/
Backp
/portage/wthrowe-gcc-trunk/dist
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131103 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-std=c++11' '-shared-libgcc' '-mtune=generic'
'-march=x86-64'
/var/tmp/portage/wthrowe-gcc-trunk/dist/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unkno
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52015
--- Comment #32 from Nathan Ridge ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #31)
> Or to put it another way, this bug only affects MinGW users, is blocked by a
> limitation in MinGW, and noone from MinGW has offered to do anything about
> it,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58983
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini ---
I can't reproduce this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38313
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Nov 3 23:49:41 2013
New Revision: 204339
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204339&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-11-03 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/38313
* parser.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52071
Bug 52071 depends on bug 38313, which changed state.
Bug 38313 Summary: g++ fails to parse a member function with a parenthesized
type name as its declarator
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38313
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38313
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52071
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52071
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|38313 |29234
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58982
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52071
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Nov 4 00:42:09 2013
New Revision: 204343
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204343&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-03 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/52071
* g++.dg/parse/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52071
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970
--- Comment #5 from Jan Smets ---
Seems to work. Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58982
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
I think at least something like this for this specific bug, but the whole file
needs auditing:
Index: stl_uninitialized.h
===
--- stl_uninitiali
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58886
--- Comment #4 from Tim Shen ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #3)
> Do we have any idea about Visual C++ and clang++? If this kind of extension
> is really popular we may want to include it under gnu++11 only, like we did
> another time
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58886
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58981
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58981
>
> --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
> The bug is in
>
> *count = expand_simple_binop (GET_MODE (*count), PLUS, *count,
>
-checking=release --with-gmp=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--with-mpfr=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --with-mpc=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--with-cloog=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131103 (experimental) [trunk revision 204333] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O1 small.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58981
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
The real bug seems in set_storage_via_setmem in expr.c:
for (mode = GET_CLASS_NARROWEST_MODE (MODE_INT); mode != VOIDmode;
mode = GET_MODE_WIDER_MODE (mode))
{
enum insn_code code = direct_optab_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55651
Mingjie Xing changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mingjie.xing at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31316
Mingjie Xing changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mingjie.xing at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58981
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58981
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
A testcase for memcpy:
[hjl@gnu-32 gcc]$ cat /tmp/memcpy-2.c
/* { dg-do run } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -minline-all-stringops" } */
extern void abort (void);
extern void exit (int);
#define MAX_OFFSET (sizeof (lo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58982
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
Well, something closer to a correct minimal fix would be is_trivial &&
is_copy_assignable. Jon, I think that in general in this file minimal fixes
would involve && with the existing is_trivial.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58983
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58984
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58984
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58979
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58980
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
59 matches
Mail list logo
