http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56488
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56484
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56484
--- Comment #5 from Venkataramanan
2013-03-01 08:42:42 UTC ---
-fno-tree-coalesce-vars for workarround
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56490
Bug #: 56490
Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] -Wall triggering infinite loop
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56489
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
--- Comment #14 from Paolo Carlini 2013-03-01
09:35:41 UTC ---
Thanks Steven for analyzing / fixing this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56488
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse 2013-03-01 09:53:20
UTC ---
Seems to me that 'e' is signed and the testcase relies on wrapping overflow
(-fwrapv helps).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56491
Bug #: 56491
Summary: [OOP] Memory leak with vtab's type-bound-procedures
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56488
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-01
09:59:39 UTC ---
But e = e + 5 is avaluated as
e = (short) ((int) e + 5)
and thus I think it just falls down to implementation defined behavior
(assuming short is smaller than int of course), b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56488
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse 2013-03-01 10:05:53
UTC ---
You are right, of course. I remembered that gcc defined unsigned->signed
conversion, but I had forgotten that it defined all narrowing conversions as
well, sorry.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56486
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56475
--- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz 2013-03-01 10:23:28
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Fri Mar 1 10:23:21 2013
New Revision: 196371
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196371
Log:
PR libstdc++/56475
* acinclude.m4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56475
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56294
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener 2013-03-01
10:27:50 UTC ---
A guess is that you end up creating SSA names during code transform in
different
order - which can result from walking a hashtable to do things (which might
be in different o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56294
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-01
10:32:34 UTC ---
No SSA_NAMEs should be created because of debug stmts.
SSA_NAME_VERSION must be identical in between -fvar-tracking-assignments and
-fno-var-tracking-assignments, DECL_UIDs mig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56492
Bug #: 56492
Summary: std::packaged_task requires CopyConstructible stored
task
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener 2013-03-01
10:44:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Created attachment 29557 [details]
> Collected hacks to make the test case compile in reasonable time with -O0
>
> Patch does 2 things:
>
> -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56492
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56486
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Known to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56483
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56483
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener 2013-03-01
11:03:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 29560
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29560
patch
Patch, queued for 4.9.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55788
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52888
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||geza at bitquad dot com
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56424
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|bootstrap |tree-optimization
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56474
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iant at google dot com
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56490
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56488
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56488
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55481
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55481
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener 2013-03-01
12:29:46 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Mar 1 12:29:39 2013
New Revision: 196377
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196377
Log:
2013-03-01 Richard Biener
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52888
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener 2013-03-01
12:46:17 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Mar 1 12:46:12 2013
New Revision: 196378
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196378
Log:
2013-03-01 Richard Biener
B
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52888
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.3, 4.8.0
Target Milestone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493
Bug #: 56493
Summary: Performance regression in google dense hashmap
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Gallagher 2013-03-01
13:11:30 UTC ---
Created attachment 29561
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29561
Sample program using dense hashmap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Gallagher 2013-03-01
13:12:41 UTC ---
I also see this same perf regression on trunk (as of r195725).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56475
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56475
--- Comment #10 from Karlson2k 2013-03-01 13:29:40 UTC ---
Could you fix 4.7 branch too?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55481
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.7.3
--- Comment #21 from Ric
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55481
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.7.3
--- Comment #21 from Ric
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: antoine.balest...@gmail.com
With GCC 4.8.0 as of 20130301 :
$ cat trunc.c
char a;
short b;
void f(void)
{
g((!!b ? : (a *= a / 0)) >= (a = b));
}
$ xgcc -w -O2 -ftra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56474
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2013-03-01
14:25:56 UTC ---
This happens because 0 - 1 overflows in sizetype:
#6 0x00ac3e3d in size_binop_loc (loc=0, code=MINUS_EXPR,
arg0=0x76d65d60, arg1=0x76d65f00)
at /hom
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56474
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ada |middle-end
--- Comment #5 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
--- Comment #16 from Steven Bosscher 2013-03-01
14:35:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> > - Queue up to-be-removed EH regions, instead of removing them one-by-one.
> > Removing them one at a time results in walking the list of EH re
10 cases or so. The error message sometimes changed to "tree code '(some
garbage)' is not supported in LTO streams" but i could not reproduce that one.
GCC 4.8.0 20130301 fails while GCC 4.7.2 works.
Compiler output:
gcc -O2 -flto -g -s ppl.ii
ppl_c_Rational
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56495
--- Comment #1 from Florian Meyer
2013-03-01 14:47:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 29562
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29562
Zipped Preprocessed source
Preprocessed source in zipped form. The file is 3mb unpacked.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56496
Bug #: 56496
Summary: [OOP] ICE with TYPE(*) coarray and SELECT TYPE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56497
Bug #: 56497
Summary: comparison is always true due to limited range of data
type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
--- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka 2013-03-01 16:14:08
UTC ---
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
>
> --- Comment #12 from Steven Bosscher 2013-03-01
> 07:50:43 UTC ---
> Last night's compilation at -O1 with my hacks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
--- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka 2013-03-01 16:19:47
UTC ---
> I will take care of the early inlining problem. I wonder, you don't have
> oprofile of that, by any chance?
Aha, callee walking in update_inline_summary. Perhaps I will real
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56312
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #32 from Jan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56491
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56498
Bug #: 56498
Summary: invalid declaration of string iterator on comma
separated list
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56499
Bug #: 56499
Summary: mpfr subdirectory path mismatch and misnamed files
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56497
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56499
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2013-03-01
17:23:02 UTC ---
>There are two Solaris 10 files named *.hp instead of *.hpp
Use gnu tar to extract the tar file otherwise you get the truncated names.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56499
--- Comment #2 from Gary Barnes 2013-03-01
17:29:26 UTC ---
I did use gnu tar. Those are the only two files with incorrect names.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [mailto:gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56497
Mathieu Malaterre changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
William J. Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56484
--- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak 2013-03-01 18:06:28
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> and the combiner combines the r60 = flags >= 0 ? ax : r59 instruction with
> r59 = r60 into r59 = flags >= 0 ? ax : r59 instruction in the last spot,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500
Bug #: 56500
Summary: [OOP] "IMPLICIT CLASS(...)" wrongly rejected
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-vali
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56499
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-03-01
18:17:35 UTC ---
There's nothing wrong with the tarball, it works for everyone else, so either
your copy is corrupted and you need to download it again or you didn't use a
recent version of GN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56498
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56499
--- Comment #4 from Gary Barnes 2013-03-01
18:36:46 UTC ---
You are correct. I used tar 1.13. Updating the various gnu tools here is
basically why I'm building gcc in the first place.
Thank you, Gary
-Original Message-
From:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56501
Bug #: 56501
Summary: gcc 4.6 ICE on noreturn function at -Os and above
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
--- Comment #19 from Steven Bosscher 2013-03-01
19:13:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
I thought you had already done that, to handle attribute flatten for
bug 54146 (http://gcc.gnu.org/PR54146#c43). This test case doesn't use
the f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-03-01
19:17:32 UTC ---
> --- Comment #11 from Ian Lance Taylor 2013-03-01
> 14:52:53 UTC ---
> I suspect we can handle this case by observing that all the incoming values to
> the PHI node are con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56499
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #13 from Ian Lance Taylor 2013-03-01 19:23:00
UTC ---
How hard would it be to test whether the values are all constant or have the
same SSA_NAME_VAR as the value we are setting?
My only concern about richi's suggestion is tha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #14 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-03-01
19:33:47 UTC ---
On 03/01/13 13:23, ian at airs dot com wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
>
> --- Comment #13 from Ian Lance Taylor 2013-03-01
> 19:23:00 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52688
jared.cantwell at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jared.cantwell at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56247
DS changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #7 from DS 2013-03-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-01
20:59:07 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 1 20:58:59 2013
New Revision: 196393
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196393
Log:
PR middle-end/56461
* tree-vec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
--- Comment #20 from Steven Bosscher 2013-03-01
21:05:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Trading memory O(number of pseudos) with a large constant factor sounds
> like something waiting for trouble for other testcases ...
FWIW, for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-01
21:06:13 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 1 21:06:04 2013
New Revision: 196394
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196394
Log:
PR middle-end/56461
* files.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56502
Bug #: 56502
Summary: entry-value: Missing DW_AT_linkage_name for C<->C++
calls
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56503
Bug #: 56503
Summary: Wrong compiler error message when compiling with
default-real-8 option and using intrinsic dble
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56503
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56504
Bug #: 56504
Summary: -mveclibabi=... Support AMD's LibM 3.0 (sucessor of
ACML)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Gallagher 2013-03-01
22:09:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 29565
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29565
Preprocessed test program source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Gallagher 2013-03-01
22:10:14 UTC ---
Ah, sorry. Just attached preprocessed sources now (which had to be compressed
to it in the 1K size limit).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56504
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56490
davidxl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xinliangli at gmail dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-01
22:54:46 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 1 22:54:39 2013
New Revision: 196396
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196396
Log:
PR middle-end/56461
* tree-vec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-01
22:55:38 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 1 22:55:26 2013
New Revision: 196397
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196397
Log:
PR middle-end/56461
* ira-buil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-01
22:56:34 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 1 22:56:18 2013
New Revision: 196398
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196398
Log:
PR middle-end/56461
* tree-ssa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52688
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2013-03-01
23:08:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I just came across the same issue in the context of lambdas (for posterity,
> since I spent time thinking this was specific to lambdas).
>
> Consid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55644
--- Comment #10 from Matt Hargett 2013-03-01 23:11:50 UTC
---
I'll file a new bug for each warning false positive that results in a bootstrap
failure. Feel free to close this one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52688
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52688
--- Comment #11 from jared.cantwell at gmail dot com 2013-03-01 23:18:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > I just came across the same issue in the context of lambdas (for posterity,
> > since I spent time thin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52688
--- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini 2013-03-01
23:23:40 UTC ---
Yes, it seems your own issue is a duplicate of PR54276, which luckily is
already fixed both in mainline and for 4.7.3.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55644
Matt Hargett changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|bootstrap-lto fails on |maybe-uninitialized false
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55644
--- Comment #12 from Matt Hargett 2013-03-01 23:38:51 UTC
---
Created attachment 29566
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29566
files generated during compilation where false positive happens with save-temps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever Confirmed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56505
Bug #: 56505
Summary: [4.7 Regression] cannot construct std::thread with
pointer to member and non-pointer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
