[Bug c++/56328] Explicit instantiation of inline function template works for base template, fails for specialized template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56328 --- Comment #4 from Michael Schlottke 2013-02-15 08:02:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > The foo<2> specialization is not declared in main.cpp before it would be > needed, so the program is ill-formed, no diagnostic required, according

[Bug c++/56328] Explicit instantiation of inline function template works for base template, fails for specialized template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56328 --- Comment #5 from Michael Schlottke 2013-02-15 08:05:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Also, [basic.def.odr]: "An inline function shall be defined in every > translation unit in which it is odr-used." and [dcl.fct.spec] "If a functio

[Bug libstdc++/56332] libstdc++-v3 does not support x86_64-pc-mingw64: No support for this host/target combination

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56332 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-02-15 08:39:20 UTC --- For mingw-w64 isn't the triplet supposed to be 'x86_64-w64-mingw32'? Or has the 'old mingw' now grown its own 64-bit support?

[Bug fortran/53818] -finit-local-zero -fno-automatic: Function result cannot have initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53818 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2013-02-15 08:50:43 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Feb 15 08:50:37 2013 New Revision: 196073 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196073 Log: 2013-02-15 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/53818] -finit-local-zero -fno-automatic: Function result cannot have initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53818 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/56339] New: [4.8 Regression]: Suboptimal register allocation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56339 Bug #: 56339 Summary: [4.8 Regression]: Suboptimal register allocation Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ra

[Bug target/55941] [4.8 Regression] Strange copy of double (in struct) to stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55941 --- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak 2013-02-15 08:55:05 UTC --- With a fix, testcase compiles to (-O2): f: addsd %xmm0, %xmm2 movapd %xmm2, %xmm0 ret gcc-4.7 generates: f: addsd %xmm2, %xmm0

[Bug rtl-optimization/50339] [4.8 Regression] suboptimal register allocation for abs(__int128_t)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50339 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/56330] ICE: verify_gimple failed: gimple_bb (stmt) is set to a wrong basic block with -fsanitize=address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56330 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-15 09:09:28 UTC --- Created attachment 29462 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29462 gcc48-pr56330.patch Lightly tested fix. Better testsuite coverage is desirable.

[Bug c++/56333] cannot use typedef name in inheriting constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56333 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/56323] [C++11] cannot compile inherited constructor for typedef'ed base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56323 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||potswa at mac dot com --- Com

[Bug c++/56328] Explicit instantiation of inline function template works for base template, fails for specialized template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56328 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-15 09:11:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > The foo<2> specialization is not declared in main.cpp before it would be > > needed, so the program is ill-formed, no

[Bug c++/56328] Explicit instantiation of inline function template works for base template, fails for specialized template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56328 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-15 09:12:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > > I fully agree. But why is there a difference then between the base template > and > the specialization? I am not arguing that the specialized t

[Bug rtl-optimization/50339] [4.8 Regression] suboptimal register allocation for abs(__int128_t)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50339 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization S

[Bug rtl-optimization/56339] [4.8 Regression]: Suboptimal register allocation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56339 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target Mi

[Bug c++/56328] Explicit instantiation of inline function template works for base template, fails for specialized template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56328 Michael Schlottke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/56337] __attribute__((aligned(N))) breaks for N=1<<28

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56337 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/56335] Optimization assumes __attribute__((aligned(N))) always works.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56335 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|U

[Bug target/56309] -O3 optimizer generates conditional moves instead of compare and branch resulting in almost 2x slower code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309 --- Comment #23 from Richard Biener 2013-02-15 09:33:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #12) > > --- by-val-O3.s.orig2013-02-14 18:06:56.0 +0100 > > +++ by-val-O3.s 2013-02-14 18:07:23.0 +0100

[Bug target/56309] -O3 optimizer generates conditional moves instead of compare and branch resulting in almost 2x slower code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug bootstrap/55644] bootstrap-lto fails on current trunk (with and without profiledbootstrap)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55644 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal --- Comment #9 from Ric

[Bug bootstrap/56327] [4.8 Regression] Revision 196009 breaks bootstrap on x32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56327 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/56321] [4.8 Regression] ICE:segfault in midend for -funsafe-math-optimizations -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56321 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener 2013-02-15 09:43:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > I see. The problem is a memory VUSE on the return statement that no longer > has > a def. The VDEF was associated with the __builtin_pow statement

[Bug rtl-optimization/56339] [4.8 Regression]: Suboptimal register allocation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56339 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/56339] [4.8 Regression]: Suboptimal register allocation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56339 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/56339] [4.8 Regression]: Suboptimal register allocation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56339 --- Comment #2 from Steven Bosscher 2013-02-15 10:00:13 UTC --- The "unbreakable" insns 12 "xmm2:DF=xmm2:DF+xmm0:DF" is created by regmove. .ce3 dump: 2: r64:DF=xmm0:DF 8: r66:DF=xmm2:DF 12: r67:DF=r66:DF+r64:DF 17: xmm0

[Bug rtl-optimization/56339] [4.8 Regression]: Suboptimal register allocation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56339 --- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher 2013-02-15 10:17:19 UTC --- Before regmove, both input operands die in insn 12: 12: r67:DF=r66:DF+r64:DF REG_DEAD r66:DF REG_DEAD r64:DF and because reg classes haven't been set up, r6

[Bug libfortran/38199] missed optimization: I/O performance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199 --- Comment #22 from Manfred Schwarb 2013-02-15 10:20:46 UTC --- Last month I had a private communication with Jerry, whether this bug can be closed. I decided to add a summary to the bugzilla page: The fix of Thomas is restricted to sca

[Bug rtl-optimization/56339] [4.8 Regression]: Suboptimal register allocation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56339 --- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher 2013-02-15 10:20:52 UTC --- Perhaps for regmove IRA classes should be set up unconditionally: Index: regmove.c === --- regmove.c (revi

[Bug libstdc++/56336] Buggy implementation of stoi, stol, stoll

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56336 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/55163] [4.8 Regression] Ongoing problem with gengtype-lex.c under CygWin with CRLF text mode line endings since 4.8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55163 --- Comment #1 from Steven Bosscher 2013-02-15 10:32:22 UTC --- What happens with GCC 4.7 if you configure with --enable-build-with-cxx ?

[Bug libstdc++/56332] libstdc++-v3 does not support x86_64-pc-mingw64: No support for this host/target combination

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56332 --- Comment #3 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2013-02-15 10:37:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > For mingw-w64 isn't the triplet supposed to be 'x86_64-w64-mingw32'? Or has > the 'old mingw' now grown its own 64-bit support? That would

[Bug c++/56038] declarations in xmmintrin.h conflict with mingw-w64 intrin.h in c++ mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56038 Matthias Kretz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kretz at kde dot org --- Comme

[Bug sanitizer/56330] ICE: verify_gimple failed: gimple_bb (stmt) is set to a wrong basic block with -fsanitize=address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56330 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|una

[Bug tree-optimization/56321] [4.8 Regression] ICE:segfault in midend for -funsafe-math-optimizations -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56321 --- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-15 11:08:38 UTC --- Created attachment 29463 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29463 Slightly modified testcase This testcase is similar, but gives the error, I thi

[Bug c++/56323] [C++11] cannot compile inherited constructor for typedef'ed base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56323 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/56318] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong result with MATMUL of PARAMETER

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56318 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2013-02-15 11:17:23 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Feb 15 11:17:15 2013 New Revision: 196075 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196075 Log: 2013-02-14 Tobias Burnus

[Bug c++/55220] [c++11] ICE when doing partial template specialization on variadic template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55220 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/55223] [C++11] Default lambda expression of a templated class member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55223 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/55232] [C++11] ICE with -Wunused-parameter for unused parameter pack using qualified dependent name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55232 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/55003] [C++11] Member function pointer not working as constexpr initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55003 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libfortran/38199] [4.7/4.8 Regression] missed optimization: I/O performance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org Targ

[Bug c++/51833] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:11333

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51833 --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 11:32:02 UTC --- This is fixed in mainline. I'm adding the reduced testcase and closing the issue.

[Bug target/56298] wmmintrin.h aborts compilation on the machines without AES

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56298 --- Comment #10 from Piotr Wyderski 2013-02-15 11:41:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) More related problems -- do they deserve their own bug reports? 1. The following workaround provided by Jakub doesen't solve the #error problem:

[Bug bootstrap/53728] [4.6 regression] Bootstrap comparison failure (gcc/varasm.o differs) with CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium3"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53728 --- Comment #3 from Kacper Kowalik 2013-02-15 11:45:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Please test the source from the latest 4.6 SVN branch. I've got report from user claiming that: commit 10612cb1b937163dcb5207913814a2fa5902cfa2

[Bug c++/55223] [C++11] Default lambda expression of a templated class member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55223 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||naddiseo at gmail dot com --- C

[Bug c++/51833] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:11333

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51833 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53486] ICE compiling code using lambdas as default argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53486 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/55223] [C++11] Default lambda expression of a templated class member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55223 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jpalecek at web dot de --- Comm

[Bug bootstrap/53728] [4.6 regression] Bootstrap comparison failure (gcc/varasm.o differs) with CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium3"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53728 --- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak 2013-02-15 12:23:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > > Please test the source from the latest 4.6 SVN branch. > > Still fails Then I need exact steps how to trigger the failure on my x86_64-linux, w

[Bug c++/56340] New: Wrong error from exception specifications of defaulted destructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56340 Bug #: 56340 Summary: Wrong error from exception specifications of defaulted destructors Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/56341] New: GCC produces unaligned data access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56341 Bug #: 56341 Summary: GCC produces unaligned data access Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Pri

[Bug c/56341] GCC produces unaligned data access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56341 --- Comment #1 from Bernd Edlinger 2013-02-15 13:12:56 UTC --- Created attachment 29465 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29465 proposed patch attached is a patch for gcc-4.6.3 that should resolve this issue. volatile

[Bug c++/56340] Wrong error from exception specifications of defaulted destructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56340 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.0 --- Comment #1 from Jon

[Bug c++/56340] Wrong error from exception specifications of defaulted destructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56340 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 Andrey Belevantsev changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29146|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/55431] Invalid auxv search in ppc linux-unwind code.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55431 --- Comment #9 from Alan Modra 2013-02-15 13:53:47 UTC --- Author: amodra Date: Fri Feb 15 13:53:40 2013 New Revision: 196077 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196077 Log: PR target/55431 * config/rs6000/l

[Bug target/55431] Invalid auxv search in ppc linux-unwind code.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55431 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED URL|

[Bug target/55431] Invalid auxv search in ppc linux-unwind code.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55431 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug libstdc++/56332] libstdc++-v3 does not support x86_64-pc-mingw64: No support for this host/target combination

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56332 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-02-15 14:09:35 UTC --- Confusing or not, the triplet is as I stated, see e.g.: http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/mingw-w64/wiki/Answer%20Multilib%20Toolchain And the 32-bit target is 'i686-w64-mi

[Bug c/56341] GCC produces unaligned data access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56341 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- C

[Bug fortran/56318] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong result with MATMUL of PARAMETER

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56318 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2013-02-15 14:20:30 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Feb 15 14:20:22 2013 New Revision: 196078 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196078 Log: 2013-02-15 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/56318] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong result with MATMUL of PARAMETER

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56318 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2013-02-15 14:20:58 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Feb 15 14:20:49 2013 New Revision: 196079 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196079 Log: 2013-02-15 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/56342] New: MATMUL with PARAMETER: Simplification usually doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56342 Bug #: 56342 Summary: MATMUL with PARAMETER: Simplification usually doesn't work Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/56318] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong result with MATMUL of PARAMETER

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56318 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/56343] New: [C++11] Destructor defaulted on first declaration has wrong implicit exception specification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56343 Bug #: 56343 Summary: [C++11] Destructor defaulted on first declaration has wrong implicit exception specification Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8

[Bug c++/56340] Wrong error from exception specifications of defaulted destructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56340 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/56340] Wrong error from exception specifications of defaulted destructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56340 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jason at gcc dot gnu.org| --- Comment #4 from Jonathan

[Bug c/56341] GCC produces unaligned data access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56341 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger 2013-02-15 14:46:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > The test case causes alignment exceptions for me on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi, > when compiled with any one of gcc 4.8, 4.7, or 4.6. Was Sandra's patch

[Bug c/56344] New: ICE for program with larger automatic structs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56344 Bug #: 56344 Summary: ICE for program with larger automatic structs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/56343] [4.8 regression] [C++11] Destructor defaulted on first declaration has wrong implicit exception specification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56343 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/56321] [4.8 Regression] ICE:segfault in midend for -funsafe-math-optimizations -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56321 --- Comment #10 from William J. Schmidt 2013-02-15 15:13:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > I see. The problem is a memory VUSE on the return statement that no longer > > has > > a def. The VDEF was asso

[Bug c/56344] ICE for program with larger automatic structs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56344 Georg changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29467|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/54276] Lambda in a Template Function Undefined Reference to local static

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54276 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug testsuite/56345] New: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-this8.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56345 Bug #: 56345 Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-this8.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug testsuite/56345] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-this8.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56345 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/56341] GCC produces unaligned data access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56341 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm*-*-* Component|c

[Bug testsuite/56345] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-this8.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56345 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 15:30:31 UTC --- This is a lot puzzling by the way. I have on idea what the specific issue being tested may have to do with the error: compiling in C++11 mode a file only including or even only

[Bug c++/56346] New: FAIL: g++.dg/tls/thread_local3.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56346 Bug #: 56346 Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/tls/thread_local3.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status

[Bug testsuite/56345] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-this8.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56345 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug testsuite/56345] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-this8.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56345 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 15:40:33 UTC --- Ah, ah, I was staring at the file *already* using __builtin_abort and was *really* puzzled.

[Bug c++/56333] cannot use typedef name in inheriting constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56333 --- Comment #2 from David Krauss 2013-02-15 15:43:07 UTC --- Also fixed within a day of updating my sources. Thanks guys!

[Bug c++/56346] FAIL: g++.dg/tls/thread_local3.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56346 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c/56335] Optimization assumes __attribute__((aligned(N))) always works.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56335 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2013-02-15 15:47:00 UTC --- See , where I discuss what I think would be the appropriate checks for supported alignment (which I de

[Bug tree-optimization/56321] [4.8 Regression] ICE:segfault in midend for -funsafe-math-optimizations -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56321 --- Comment #11 from William J. Schmidt 2013-02-15 15:49:03 UTC --- OK, got it. I was on the right track, there were just several locations where it could happen and I missed one.

[Bug c++/56346] FAIL: g++.dg/tls/thread_local3.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56346 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-02-15 15:55:07 UTC --- On 2013-02-15 9:44 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > Target doesn't use crtstuff.c. > Why? That looks like the bug to me. It only supports ELF and COFF file

[Bug tree-optimization/56294] BOOT_CFLAGS='-O2 -g -fno-ipa-sra' leads to bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56294 --- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor 2013-02-15 16:00:43 UTC --- Created attachment 29469 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29469 Reduced testcase Testcase reduced by multidelta that fails with -c -O2 -fno-ipa-sra -fno-e

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #31 from David Edelsohn 2013-02-15 16:15:19 UTC --- With the patch, the testcase no longer ICEs when compiled on powerpc-aix.

[Bug c++/52026] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Constexpr Variable Appears Uninitialized in Lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52026 --- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15 16:17:31 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Feb 15 16:17:25 2013 New Revision: 196081 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196081 Log: PR c++/52026 * semantics.c (fi

[Bug testsuite/56345] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-this8.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56345 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/56347] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_2.f90 -O2 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56347 Bug #: 56347 Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_2.f90 -O2 execution test Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/56339] [4.8 Regression]: Suboptimal register allocation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56339 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov 2013-02-15 16:48:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Perhaps for regmove IRA classes should be set up unconditionally: > > Index: regmove.c > ===

[Bug rtl-optimization/56348] New: internal compiler error in assign_by_spills with -m32 -fPIC -msse2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56348 Bug #: 56348 Summary: internal compiler error in assign_by_spills with -m32 -fPIC -msse2 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UN

[Bug target/55987] Redundant constant emitted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55987 --- Comment #2 from Tilman Sauerbeck 2013-02-15 16:50:52 UTC --- Created attachment 29470 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29470 dejagnu testcase Simplified dejagnu test case.

[Bug c++/55783] Warnings instead of compiler errors for narrowing conversions within list-initializations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55783 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/56343] [4.8 regression] [C++11] Destructor defaulted on first declaration has wrong implicit exception specification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56343 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15 17:19:56 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Feb 15 17:19:45 2013 New Revision: 196082 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196082 Log: PR c++/56343 * class.c (check_b

[Bug c++/56343] [4.8 regression] [C++11] Destructor defaulted on first declaration has wrong implicit exception specification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56343 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/56135] [c++11] this incorrectly captured as null in template member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56135 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15 18:31:41 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Feb 15 18:31:28 2013 New Revision: 196085 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196085 Log: PR c++/56135 * pt.c (tsubst_cop

[Bug c++/55710] [C++11] Linkage errors with lambdas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15 18:32:05 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Feb 15 18:31:52 2013 New Revision: 196086 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196086 Log: PR c++/55710 * semantics.c (ma

  1   2   >