http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50339
Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |ra Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2013-02-15 CC| |vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 Summary|suboptimal register |[4.8 Regression] suboptimal |allocation for |register allocation for |abs(__int128_t) |abs(__int128_t) Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> 2013-02-15 08:57:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > It looks even worse in 4.8: So, a regression from 4.7.