[Bug bootstrap/54283] [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug debug/53860] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in should_move_die_to_comdat, at dwarf2out.c:6254 with -fkeep-inline-functions -fdebug-types-section -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53860 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug sanitizer/55371] [asan] False -Werror=uninitialized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55371 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-28 19:29:25 UTC --- Also /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/libgfortran/intrinsics/unpack_generic.c: In function ‘unpack_internal’: /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/libgfortran/intrinsics/unpack_generic.c:149:12: warning:

[Bug target/54791] AIX-only: Constructors are not called in main program.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791 --- Comment #30 from David Edelsohn 2012-11-28 19:35:36 UTC --- > 1) how did you install the gcc(you said it works on your aix) ? I mean what > mpfr,gmp, libmpc did you use and how did you install them? I built gmp, mpfr and mpc from sou

[Bug sanitizer/55519] New: [asan] False positive -Wmaybe-uninitialized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55519 Bug #: 55519 Summary: [asan] False positive -Wmaybe-uninitialized Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug middle-end/55507] [4.8 Regression] ICE in vt_expand_var_loc_chain, at var-tracking.c:8020

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55507 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-11-28 19:40:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > On 11/28/2012 1:25 PM, rth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > Since this is _powtf2, you probably need --enable-long-double-128 in the > > configure line

[Bug other/55358] Valgrind errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55358 --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2012-11-28 19:58:43 UTC --- iterative_hash_canonical_type (type=0x5941dc8, val=0) at /home/markus/gcc/gcc/gimple.c:3170 3170 *slot = (void *) mp; (gdb) bt #0 iterative_hash_canonical_type (t

[Bug target/55492] __atomic_load doesn't match ACQUIRE memory model

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55492 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com ---

[Bug middle-end/55438] [4.8 Regression]: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t001 - t028, gcc.c-torture/execute/991118-1.c, gcc.c-torture/execute/bf64-1.c, ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55438 --- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-28 20:13:39 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Wed Nov 28 20:13:22 2012 New Revision: 193905 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193905 Log: gcc/ PR middle-end

[Bug sanitizer/55518] boehm-gc, libatomic, libffi and libgomp testsuite can't find path to libasan for make check with -fsanitizer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55518 --- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth 2012-11-28 20:18:00 UTC --- Jakub, I've reposted the current results on x86_64-apple-darwin12 for... make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-fsanitize=address}'" with manual adjustments to the

[Bug middle-end/55438] [4.8 Regression]: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t001 - t028, gcc.c-torture/execute/991118-1.c, gcc.c-torture/execute/bf64-1.c, ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55438 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resoluti

[Bug tree-optimization/55052] [4.8 regression] vect-widening tests are failing and giving wrong results

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55052 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assigned

[Bug middle-end/52173] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed possibly caused by itm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/52173] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed possibly caused by itm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIX

[Bug libgcc/48076] Unsafe double checked locking in __emutls_get_address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48076 --- Comment #8 from Richard Henderson 2012-11-28 21:01:29 UTC --- Author: rth Date: Wed Nov 28 21:01:26 2012 New Revision: 193907 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193907 Log: PR libgcc/48076 * emutls.c (_

[Bug sanitizer/55518] boehm-gc, libatomic, libffi and libgomp testsuite can't find path to libasan for make check with -fsanitizer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55518 --- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth 2012-11-28 21:02:32 UTC --- I meant many instances in a single g=+/libstdc++-v3 testsuite failure showing mulitple instances of ASAN:SIGSEGV.

[Bug c++/53094] vector literal

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53094 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28820|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/55520] New: [C++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55520 Bug #: 55520 Summary: [C++11 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c++/55520] [C++11] ICE when capturing a variable-length stack array in lambda; in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9122

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55520 etlverified at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[C++11 |[C++11] ICE when cap

[Bug lto/55466] [4.8 Regression] Revision 191466 destroyed DWARF debug info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55466 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/54283] [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2012-11-28 21:40:38 UTC --- > The general assumption on non-cross scenarios is that we're able to run a > program created by CC and CXX. If this is not the case, not even > configure-time execution tests involv

[Bug fortran/52161] Internal compiler errors with -fcheck=bounds in coarray tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52161 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-11-28 21:42:21 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Wed Nov 28 21:42:17 2012 New Revision: 193908 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193908 Log: 2012-11-28 Tobias Burnus

[Bug sanitizer/55521] New: many instances of ASAN:SIGSEGV failures in g++ testsuite with -fsanitize=address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55521 Bug #: 55521 Summary: many instances of ASAN:SIGSEGV failures in g++ testsuite with -fsanitize=address Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/55052] [4.8 regression] vect-widening tests are failing and giving wrong results

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55052 --- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-28 21:45:08 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Wed Nov 28 21:45:03 2012 New Revision: 193909 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193909 Log: gcc/ PR rtl-optimi

[Bug tree-optimization/55052] [4.8 regression] vect-widening tests are failing and giving wrong results

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55052 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resoluti

[Bug sanitizer/55521] many instances of ASAN:SIGSEGV failures in g++ testsuite with -fsanitize=address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55521 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2012-11-28 21:47:41 UTC --- Created attachment 28823 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28823 assembly file for failing g++.dg/eh/cond1.C -std=c++98 with -fsanitize=address

[Bug c++/53094] vector literal

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53094 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse 2012-11-28 21:52:54 UTC --- Handling subscripts will be harder. Currently, v[1] is turned into ((const long*)&v)[1]. But (const long*)&v doesn't work as a constant expression. So we would need to change the

[Bug sanitizer/55521] many instances of ASAN:SIGSEGV failures in g++ testsuite with -fsanitize=address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55521 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2012-11-28 21:55:14 UTC --- The majority of the libstdc+++-v3 testsuite failures seen with -fsanitize=address appear to be of the same form. It is difficult to get an accurate count because many instances s

[Bug fortran/52161] Internal compiler errors with -fcheck=bounds in coarray tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52161 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/54279] [4.8 Regression] first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski 2012-11-28 22:11:35 UTC --- Author: pinskia Date: Wed Nov 28 22:11:29 2012 New Revision: 193910 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193910 Log: 2012-11-28 Andrew Pinski

[Bug other/54279] [4.8 Regression] first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug sanitizer/55521] many instances of ASAN:SIGSEGV failures in g++ testsuite with -fsanitize=address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55521 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2012-11-28 22:16:25 UTC --- I don't see the g++.dg/eh/cond1.C execution failures on x86_64 Fedora 15 so this may well be darwin specific. In gdb, on x86_64 darwin12 this traces as... # gdb ./cond1.exe

[Bug sanitizer/55521] many instances of ASAN:SIGSEGV failures in g++ testsuite with -fsanitize=address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55521 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2012-11-28 22:28:55 UTC --- Debugging a similar build of cond1.exe on darwin12 without -fsanitize=address show exactly the same trace except... Single stepping until exit from function dyld_stub_pthread_o

[Bug debug/36728] [stack]: gdb doesn't work with stack alignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36728 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-28 23:01:14 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 28 23:01:03 2012 New Revision: 193911 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193911 Log: PR debug/36728 PR debug/55467

[Bug bootstrap/55511] [4.8 Regression] r193802 caused s390x bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55511 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-28 23:01:21 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 28 23:01:03 2012 New Revision: 193911 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193911 Log: PR debug/36728 PR debug/55467

[Bug debug/55467] [4.8 Regression] Debug info issues with gcc.dg/guality/pr36728-*.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55467 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-28 23:01:21 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 28 23:01:03 2012 New Revision: 193911 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193911 Log: PR debug/36728 PR debug/55467

[Bug middle-end/55507] [4.8 Regression] ICE in vt_expand_var_loc_chain, at var-tracking.c:8020

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55507 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-28 23:01:21 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 28 23:01:03 2012 New Revision: 193911 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193911 Log: PR debug/36728 PR debug/55467

[Bug libmudflap/53952] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx ( -O[123]) execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53952 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/55521] many instances of ASAN:SIGSEGV failures in g++ testsuite with -fsanitize=address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55521 --- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth 2012-11-29 00:47:14 UTC --- This problem doesn't occur with x86_64 Fedora 15 built with --disable-tls. Also, using llvm 3.2's clang++ on x86_64-apple-darwin12, I can compile... /sw/opt/llvm-3.2/bin/clang+

[Bug c++/55522] New: -funsafe-math-optimizations is unexpectedly harmful, especially w/ -shared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55522 Bug #: 55522 Summary: -funsafe-math-optimizations is unexpectedly harmful, especially w/ -shared Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug middle-end/55401] uninstrumented path in TM clones are still instrumented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55401 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/55523] New: gencondmd C++ conversion breaks peephole2 predicates use of get_attr_*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55523 Bug #: 55523 Summary: gencondmd C++ conversion breaks peephole2 predicates use of get_attr_* Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug c++/55522] -funsafe-math-optimizations is unexpectedly harmful, especially w/ -shared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55522 --- Comment #1 from Andy Lutomirski 2012-11-29 01:48:53 UTC --- I mean IEEE754, of course.

[Bug tree-optimization/55524] New: If fnma exists but not fms, convert_mult_to_fma should prefer to former over the latter.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55524 Bug #: 55524 Summary: If fnma exists but not fms, convert_mult_to_fma should prefer to former over the latter. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/55524] If fnma exists but not fms, convert_mult_to_fma should prefer to former over the latter.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55524 --- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2012-11-29 02:10:12 UTC --- Created attachment 28825 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28825 Patch to prioritize existing fnma over non-existing fms

[Bug rtl-optimization/54910] ARM: Missed optimization of very simple ctz function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54910 bin.cheng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker.cheng at gmail dot

[Bug c++/52654] [C++11] Warn on overflow in user-defined literals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52654 --- Comment #20 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-29 02:30:48 UTC --- Author: emsr Date: Thu Nov 29 02:30:44 2012 New Revision: 193918 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193918 Log: gcc/c-family/ 2012-11-29 Ed

[Bug lto/55525] New: ICE: tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6768

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55525 Bug #: 55525 Summary: ICE: tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6768 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4

[Bug lto/55525] ICE: tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6768

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55525 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28826|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type

[Bug lto/55525] ICE: tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6768

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55525 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2012-11-29 03:07:21 UTC --- 4.8.0: In file included from :0:0: 1.c:3:6: warning: type of 's' does not match original declaration [enabled by default] char s[8]; ^ In file included from 1.c:

[Bug c++/55526] New: [C++11] Irrelevant error message for function parameter wrongly used in noexcept specifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55526 Bug #: 55526 Summary: [C++11] Irrelevant error message for function parameter wrongly used in noexcept specifier Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug other/55527] New: Passing structures containing floats by value in calls are underoptimized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55527 Bug #: 55527 Summary: Passing structures containing floats by value in calls are underoptimized Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Sta

[Bug fortran/51727] Changing module files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727 --- Comment #33 from Joost VandeVondele 2012-11-29 07:30:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #31) > As for the backport, I think the patch is absolutely risk-free, and it should > have been approved for 4.7 even though it doesn't fulfill the f

[Bug libmudflap/53952] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx ( -O[123]) execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53952 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/55520] [C++11] ICE when capturing a variable-length stack array in lambda; in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9122

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55520 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

<    1   2