http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-28
19:21:10 UTC ---
The general assumption on non-cross scenarios is that we're able to run a
program created by CC and CXX. If this is not the case, not even
configure-time execution tests involving the compilers would fail. This
suggests to me that we don't have a bug or even a regression here; it just so
happens that we use CXX now, and CXX has never worked “properly” on Rainer's
setting. I suggest setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH so that CXX works “properly”, or
using a CXX with -static-libstdc++ and whatever other options are needed to
make newly-created executables run. I'm not sure this requires a documentation
change.
