http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55237
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55253
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-11-11 09:22:12 UTC ---
Reduced:
markus@x4 /tmp % cat test.i
struct
{
int mallocFailed;
}
*a;
struct StrAccum
{
int useMalloc;
}
b, c;
static void
fn1 (struct StrAccum *p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55270
Bug #: 55270
Summary: ICE in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:823
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55260
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55268
--- Comment #1 from SquallATF 2012-11-11 11:05:58
UTC ---
I found the reason, TARGET_MANGLE_DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME is defined to
ix86_mangle_decl_assembler_name in gcc/config/i386/i386.c overide the define
i386_pe_mangle_decl_assembler_name i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55271
Bug #: 55271
Summary: missing warning set-but-unused
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55171
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53824
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54153
wbrana changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54077
wbrana changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression]|Bytemark FP EMULATION
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55271
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-11-11
17:24:19 UTC ---
The pointer is used in *li = 0; statement.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55272
Bug #: 55272
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE on passing coarray argument
between files
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55272
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
--- Comment #36 from Jan Hubicka 2012-11-11
18:14:40 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Nov 11 18:14:35 2012
New Revision: 193406
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193406
Log:
PR middle-end/48636
* ipa-in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55229
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55271
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-11-11
18:42:25 UTC ---
oh, was over-simplified example. Sorry
void f1()
{
char ch;
char *p = &ch;
*p = 0;
}
Now 2 variables are 'set-but-unused'?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47440
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-11 19:17:22 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Nov 11 19:17:17 2012
New Revision: 193409
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193409
Log:
PR target/47440
* config
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55238
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2012-11-11
19:35:31 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Nov 11 19:35:27 2012
New Revision: 193410
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193410
Log:
PR tree-optimization/55238
* ip
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55273
Bug #: 55273
Summary: [4.8.0 regression] ICE in iv_number_of_iterations, at
loop-iv.c:2819
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55273
--- Comment #1 from Douglas Mencken 2012-11-11
19:58:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 28659
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28659
Original C source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55273
--- Comment #2 from Douglas Mencken 2012-11-11
19:58:43 UTC ---
Created attachment 28660
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28660
Assembly source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55274
Bug #: 55274
Summary: gcc build hangs on HP-UX 11.11
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55271
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55275
Bug #: 55275
Summary: abi_tag attribute doesn't work on explicit
specializations of class templates
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55263
--- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher 2012-11-11
20:29:15 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Sun Nov 11 20:29:11 2012
New Revision: 193412
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193412
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/55263
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55263
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43056
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-02-13 23:09:24 |2012-11-11 23:09:24
Known
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43546
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Last reconfirmed|2012-01-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55238
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44332
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55276
Bug #: 55276
Summary: [4.8 regression] ppc: callee-saved vector registers
not preserved
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55276
--- Comment #1 from Mans Rullgard 2012-11-11 21:07:12
UTC ---
Created attachment 28663
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28663
Test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15184
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #23 from Steven
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33763
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #39 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243
--- Comment #3 from Rolf Ebert 2012-11-11
21:29:58 UTC ---
Here is the requested build log:
make[2]: Entering directory `/c/Devel/gcc-cvs.not/build/gcc-obj/gnattools'
rm -rf ../gcc/ada/tools
mkdir -p ../gcc/ada/tools
(cd ../gcc/ada/too
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55277
Bug #: 55277
Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] ICE in assign_by_spills, at
lra-assigns.c:1217
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55277
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42536
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|55277 |
Summary|[4.6/4.7/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55247
--- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou 2012-11-11
21:52:53 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Nov 11 21:52:49 2012
New Revision: 193415
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193415
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/55247
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55259
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2012-11-11
21:52:53 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Nov 11 21:52:49 2012
New Revision: 193415
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193415
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/55247
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51447
--- Comment #12 from Steven Bosscher 2012-11-11
22:05:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Created attachment 26100 [details]
> gcc47-pr51447.patch
>
> While that fixes the testcase at -O1, at -O2 and above it still fails.
> Apparent
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51447
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53101
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse 2012-11-11 22:18:13
UTC ---
PR 48037 seems related (it was the scalar case).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41993
--- Comment #11 from Uros Bizjak 2012-11-11 22:45:18
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Fixed on trunk.
Actually, implementing post-reload pass it looks to me, that in this place we
are only interested in function return hard registers
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55278
Bug #: 55278
Summary: Botan performance regressions apparently due to LRA
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55259
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55247
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53512
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo 2012-11-12 00:27:59
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Nov 12 00:27:56 2012
New Revision: 193423
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193423
Log:
PR target/53512
* config/sh/sh.m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48806
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55279
Bug #: 55279
Summary: New pseudo registers aren't supported in CSE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55279
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-11-12
03:49:22 UTC ---
Can you explain how you hit this with what patch and what testcase on what
target?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142
--- Comment #32 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-12 04:08:02
UTC ---
Can we limit
(zero_extend:DI (plus:SI (FOO:SI) (const_int Y)))
to
(plus:DI (zero_extend:DI (FOO:SI)) (const_int Y))
transformation to Y > TARGET SPECIFIC VALUE? For x86-64,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-11-12
04:37:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 28664
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28664
reduced test-case
Reduced test-case. Do e.g. "cc1 -fpreprocessed pr55030-chk.i -quiet
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-11-12
04:53:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created attachment 28664 [details]
> reduced test-case
Only intended for code inspection, not a self-contained test-case; that's
already cove
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54413
Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28617|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55280
Bug #: 55280
Summary: Compiler error: Class definition is recognized as
function declaration
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55280
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-11-12
06:36:20 UTC ---
A a(B()); is a function declaration and not a variable declaration. This is
one of the ambiguities of the parsing which the C++ standard decided it was a
function rather than a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55279
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-12 07:25:27
UTC ---
If we revert the explow.c change:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=177592
gcc.dg/Warray-bounds.c will cause valgrind error with
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -O2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55257
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-12
07:51:26 UTC ---
If the target doesn't call final_start_function and final_end_function in
output_mi_thunk targhook (or equivalent), it is a target bug.
60 matches
Mail list logo