http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55171



Mikael Pettersson <mikpe at it dot uu.se> changed:



           What    |Removed                     |Added

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 CC|                            |mikpe at it dot uu.se



--- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe at it dot uu.se> 2012-11-11 
14:30:14 UTC ---

It's caused by "[patch i386]: Set for method-functions default

calling-convention to thiscall for 32-bit msabi" in r171890:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg00066.html

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-04/msg00082.html



With x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ -m32 -O2 there are numerous code generation

differences in r171890 for this test case (as expected with the changed calling

convention), but looking only at the virtual thunk we see:



--- pr55171.s-r171889   2012-11-11 14:51:38.000000000 +0100

+++ pr55171.s-r171890   2012-11-11 15:00:58.000000000 +0100

...

 __ZTv0_n16_NK7Derived3fooEv:

-       movl    8(%esp), %eax

-       movl    (%eax), %ecx

-       addl    -16(%ecx), %eax

-       movl    %eax, 8(%esp)

+       movl    4(%esp), %eax

+       movl    (%eax), %eax

+       addl    -16(%eax), %eax

+       movl    %eax, 4(%esp)

        jmp     LTHUNK2

...



The two code sequences are clearly not equivalent (ignore the stack position of

the pointer being adjusted).



Running the test case confirms: with g++ @ r171889 it succeeds, but with g++ @

r171890 it gets a runtime failure.

Reply via email to