[Bug bootstrap/54688] [4.8 regression] violation of implicit restriction "No_Elaboration_Code" on a-ioexce.ads

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54688 --- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou 2012-09-28 07:55:19 UTC --- > The offset range should not be an issue with the right constraints etc.; the > port really ought to be changed. Yes, in fact we already have the machinery to do it. > In

[Bug rtl-optimization/52543] lower-subreg.c: code bloat of 300%-400% for multi-word memory splits

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52543 --- Comment #15 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-09-28 08:21:19 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Fri Sep 28 08:21:06 2012 New Revision: 191820 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191820 Log: PR rtl-optimization/52543 * c

[Bug bootstrap/54732] [4.8 regression] Installation failure: libbacktrace rebuilds upon install when built with "make bootstrap-lean"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54732 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/54713] [4.8 Regression] error: non-trivial conversion at assignment in gcc.c-torture/compile/pr53410-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54713 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-28 08:36:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Created attachment 28293 [details] > gcc48-pr54713.patch > > Updated patch. I had to make the CONSTRUCTOR checking less strict, in > particula

[Bug lto/54095] Unnecessary static variable renaming

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095 --- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-28 08:37:56 UTC --- Ok, I give up ;) Honza, I think we should go with your patch to re-name before LTO symtab merging as a first step, we can try improving later ...

[Bug bootstrap/54718] [4.8 regression] ICE in remap_gimple_stmt, at tree-inline.c:1468

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54718 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iant at google dot com Dep

[Bug bootstrap/54718] [4.8 regression] ICE in remap_gimple_stmt, at tree-inline.c:1468

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54718 --- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2012-09-28 08:54:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > The fix for PR bootstrap/54688 also fixed this one. I can't say if there's > another unrelated issue here, though. > > There's one other problem (wh

[Bug lto/54705] ICE during custom LTO bootstrap with Ada enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54705 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/54729] __compare_and_swap does not return on all paths

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54729 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/54249] [C++11] No ::nullptr_t in header

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54249 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/54249] [C++11] No ::nullptr_t in header

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54249 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/54733] New: Missing opportunity to optimize endian independent load/store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54733 Bug #: 54733 Summary: Missing opportunity to optimize endian independent load/store Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCON

[Bug fortran/54730] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1066

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54730 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/54724] libgfortran does not respect --disable-werror

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54724 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/54730] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1066

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54730 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE in |[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]

[Bug debug/54734] New: Debug info for C++ and LTO misses types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54734 Bug #: 54734 Summary: Debug info for C++ and LTO misses types Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: lto Se

[Bug tree-optimization/54733] Missing opportunity to optimize endian independent load/store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54733 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug lto/47799] LTO debug info for early inlined functions missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47799 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-28 11:07:22 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Sep 28 11:07:17 2012 New Revision: 191824 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191824 Log: 2012-09-28 Richard Guenther

[Bug tree-optimization/54713] [4.8 Regression] error: non-trivial conversion at assignment in gcc.c-torture/compile/pr53410-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54713 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-28 12:19:07 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Sep 28 12:18:57 2012 New Revision: 191826 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191826 Log: PR tree-optimization/54713 * fo

[Bug target/54716] Select best typed instruction for bitwise operations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-28 12:21:01 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Sep 28 12:20:54 2012 New Revision: 191827 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191827 Log: PR target/54716 * config/i386/

[Bug c++/53551] -Wunused-local-typedefs misses uses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53551 --- Comment #5 from Dodji Seketeli 2012-09-28 12:21:49 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Fri Sep 28 12:21:33 2012 New Revision: 191828 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191828 Log: PR c++/53551 - -Wunused-local-typedefs

[Bug c++/53551] -Wunused-local-typedefs misses uses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53551 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/54731] [4.8 regression] arm-elf/arm-eabisim crosses fails in make-check due to undefined LFE references: corrupt debug_line tables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54731 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/29028] No warning about unused names introduced with using declarations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29028 --- Comment #4 from Dodji Seketeli 2012-09-28 12:51:42 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Fri Sep 28 12:51:30 2012 New Revision: 191829 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191829 Log: PR c++/29028 - Missed unused warning on

[Bug tree-optimization/54735] New: [4.8 Regression] Segmentation fault in walk_aliased_vdefs_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54735 Bug #: 54735 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Segmentation fault in walk_aliased_vdefs_1 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/29028] No warning about unused names introduced with using declarations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29028 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/54345] jump threading leaks e->aux heap memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54345 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/54735] [4.8 Regression] Segmentation fault in walk_aliased_vdefs_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54735 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/47799] LTO debug info for early inlined functions missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47799 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|u

[Bug fortran/54730] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1066

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54730 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-28 13:11:16 UTC --- Note that the error goes away when replacing the generic intrinsic REAL by a specific one, e.g. FLOAT: implicit none intrinsic :: float real :: vec(1:2) ve

[Bug c++/54372] __attribute__((unused)) doesn't work with unused local typedef in template function.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54372 --- Comment #7 from Dodji Seketeli 2012-09-28 13:32:52 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Fri Sep 28 13:32:41 2012 New Revision: 191830 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191830 Log: PR c++/54372 - unused attribute inactiv

[Bug c++/54372] __attribute__((unused)) doesn't work with unused local typedef in template function.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54372 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/54725] cross gfortran always searches host paths (e.g. /usr/include)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54725 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/54725] cross gfortran always searches host paths (e.g. /usr/include)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54725 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-28 14:30:09 UTC --- I forgot half of the patch - the second half is needed when no system root exists. The patch is still untested. --- a/gcc/fortran/cpp.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/cpp.c @@ -40,2 +40,

[Bug libstdc++/54448] many failures with /sbin/loader: Error: libstdc++.so.6: symbol "__pthread_mutex_init" unresolved

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54448 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot

[Bug libstdc++/54448] many failures with /sbin/loader: Error: libstdc++.so.6: symbol "__pthread_mutex_init" unresolved

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54448 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-09-28 15:40:37 UTC --- How is GCC configured?

[Bug c++/54401] Missing diagnostics about type-alias at class scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54401 --- Comment #1 from dodji at seketeli dot org 2012-09-28 15:43:34 UTC --- A candidate patch was sent to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg01906.html

[Bug libstdc++/54448] many failures with /sbin/loader: Error: libstdc++.so.6: symbol "__pthread_mutex_init" unresolved

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54448 --- Comment #5 from Hin-Tak Leung 2012-09-28 15:51:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > How is GCC configured? Just "/where/source/is/configure" with no options. You can see it at the bottom of : http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/

[Bug libfortran/54736] New: GFORTRAN_CONVERT_UNIT causes malloc error on several platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54736 Bug #: 54736 Summary: GFORTRAN_CONVERT_UNIT causes malloc error on several platforms Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONF

[Bug libfortran/54736] GFORTRAN_CONVERT_UNIT causes malloc error on several platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54736 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

gcc-4.7.2 bug in Makefile.in and configure.ac

Hello: Building gcc-4.7.2 on Darwin 9.8.0 i386 with the options Macintosh-85:gcc-build regular$ /usr/local/gcc-4.7.2/bin/gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/local/gcc-4.7.2/bin/gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-4.7.2/libexec/gcc/i386-apple-darwin9.8.0/4.7.2/lto-wrapper Target: i38

[Bug tree-optimization/54735] [4.8 Regression] Segmentation fault in walk_aliased_vdefs_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54735 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dehao at gcc dot gnu.org,

Re: gcc-4.7.2 bug in Makefile.in and configure.ac

Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2012-09/msg02363.html Hi, the gcc-bugs list is for automated mails from the GCC Bugzilla database. Please use Bugzilla to report bugs, rather than mailing the list directly, this ensures the mail will be read and the issue can be tracked correctly. The issue y

[Bug bootstrap/54688] [4.8 regression] violation of implicit restriction "No_Elaboration_Code" on a-ioexce.ads

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54688 --- Comment #14 from Bernd Schmidt 2012-09-28 20:33:00 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Fri Sep 28 20:32:55 2012 New Revision: 191838 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191838 Log: PR bootstrap/54688 * sched-de

[Bug lto/54737] New: ICE on PA-RISC with LTO and -ftrapv

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54737 Bug #: 54737 Summary: ICE on PA-RISC with LTO and -ftrapv Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug bootstrap/54688] [4.8 regression] violation of implicit restriction "No_Elaboration_Code" on a-ioexce.ads

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54688 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/54735] [4.8 Regression] Segmentation fault in walk_aliased_vdefs_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54735 Dehao Chen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dehao at google dot com --- Commen

[Bug tree-optimization/54735] [4.8 Regression] Segmentation fault in walk_aliased_vdefs_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54735 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2012-09-28 20:55:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > r191747 should not increase the memory consumption. Instead, it'll only > speedup > compilation. > > I tried to compile the testcase without

[Bug c++/54738] New: [C++11][SFINAE] Hard errors for pointer-to-member function expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54738 Bug #: 54738 Summary: [C++11][SFINAE] Hard errors for pointer-to-member function expressions Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status

[Bug c++/54738] [C++11][SFINAE] Hard errors for pointer-to-member function expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54738 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/54725] cross gfortran always searches host paths (e.g. /usr/include)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54725 --- Comment #6 from Mike Frysinger 2012-09-28 23:12:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) that's half the equation. the other half is the build system support. in gcc/Makefile.in, they do: CFLAGS-c-family/c-opts.o += @TARGET_SYSTEM_R

[Bug c++/54738] [C++11][SFINAE] Hard errors for pointer-to-member function expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54738 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/54724] libgfortran does not respect --disable-werror

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54724 --- Comment #2 from Mike Frysinger 2012-09-28 23:20:09 UTC --- i'm 50/50 on this. if the code doesn't utilize anything beyond the local code base, and isn't compiled/processed by anything other than the local compiler, then the -Werror sh

[Bug rtl-optimization/54739] New: [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c scan-rtl-dump subreg1 "Splitting reg"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739 Bug #: 54739 Summary: [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c scan-rtl-dump subreg1 "Splitting reg" Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug c++/54740] New: Empty base optimization gets confused when a member variable derives from the same empty base.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54740 Bug #: 54740 Summary: Empty base optimization gets confused when a member variable derives from the same empty base. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: u

[Bug c++/54740] Empty base optimization gets confused when a member variable derives from the same empty base.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54740 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/54740] Empty base optimization gets confused when a member variable derives from the same empty base.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54740 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-09-29 00:01:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > No they shouldn't. The standard requires this to pass: > > outer o; > assert( static_cast(&o) != &o.i_ ); Oops, that should be: asse

[Bug c++/54740] Empty base optimization gets confused when a member variable derives from the same empty base.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54740 --- Comment #3 from Andy Venikov 2012-09-29 00:09:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > No they shouldn't. The standard requires this to pass: > > > > outer o; > > assert( static_cast(&o) != &o.i_ ); >

[Bug c++/54741] New: GCC 4.4, 4.5, 4.6 4.7 (probably 4.8) Generates un-usable code on AVX supported CPUs (FreeBSD)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54741 Bug #: 54741 Summary: GCC 4.4, 4.5, 4.6 4.7 (probably 4.8) Generates un-usable code on AVX supported CPUs (FreeBSD) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.

[Bug c++/54741] GCC 4.4, 4.5, 4.6 4.7 (probably 4.8) Generates un-usable code on AVX supported CPUs (FreeBSD)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54741 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/54742] New: Switch elimination in FSM loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742 Bug #: 54742 Summary: Switch elimination in FSM loop Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug tree-optimization/54742] Switch elimination in FSM loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment

[Bug debug/54731] [4.8 regression] arm-elf/arm-eabisim crosses fails in make-check due to undefined LFE references: corrupt debug_line tables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54731 --- Comment #2 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-09-29 03:59:12 UTC --- Confirmed, -g0 and the problem is not present, -g1 and yes.

[Bug c++/54741] GCC 4.4, 4.5, 4.6 4.7 (probably 4.8) Generates un-usable code on AVX supported CPUs (FreeBSD)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54741 --- Comment #2 from M.S. Babaei 2012-09-29 05:43:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > What is the instruction it is causing an illegal instruction signal? > Run the resulting program using gdb to find out. As I mentiond above running t

[Bug c/54743] New: Large loop runs endingless

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54743 Bug #: 54743 Summary: Large loop runs endingless Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3