[Bug c++/54740] Empty base optimization gets confused when a member variable derives from the same empty base.

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54740



--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-09-29 
00:01:31 UTC ---

(In reply to comment #1)

> No they shouldn't. The standard requires this to pass:

> 

>   outer o;

>   assert( static_cast<inner*>(&o) != &o.i_ );



Oops, that should be:



   assert( static_cast<empty_base*>(&o) != &o.i_ );