http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54612
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54364
--- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-19 07:40:21 UTC ---
Author: amker
Date: Wed Sep 19 07:40:15 2012
New Revision: 191462
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191462
Log:
PR middle-end/54364
* bb-reorder.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2012-09-19 08:23:45 UTC
---
> --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-18
> 14:20:45 UTC ---
> Created attachment 28215
> --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28215
> patch
>
> More complete p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-19
08:46:37 UTC ---
Still non-canonical RTL should not result in wrong-code.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54132
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-19
08:59:18 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Sep 19 08:59:06 2012
New Revision: 191463
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191463
Log:
2012-09-19 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54132
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54621
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54623
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53316
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-19
09:30:03 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Sep 19 09:29:57 2012
New Revision: 191464
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191464
Log:
2012-09-19 Richard Guenther
PR other/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53316
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-19
09:31:53 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Sep 19 09:31:49 2012
New Revision: 191465
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191465
Log:
2012-09-19 Richard Guenther
PR other/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53316
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54624
Bug #: 54624
Summary: [4.8 Regression] r191253 causes
gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-8.c runtime failure on
alpha
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Versio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54624
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54624
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54420
--- Comment #6 from Patrik Hägglund
2012-09-19 10:27:37 UTC ---
Jason Merrill wrote:
> In addition, some identifiers are reserved for use by C++ implementations and
> standard libraries (17.6.4.3.2) and shall not be used otherwise; no diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54420
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54420
--- Comment #8 from Patrik Hägglund
2012-09-19 11:04:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> the fix is too risky for the lower priority of the bug
This is a good explanation! :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54625
Bug #: 54625
Summary: [4.8 Regression] lto/profiledbootstrap broken
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54625
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54127
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54286
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54471
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-19
12:08:23 UTC ---
Recent added -Og also FAILs some of the -chk testcases at runtime.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52579
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53062
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53145
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53518
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54286
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54145
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53671
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53518
--- Comment #6 from gee 2012-09-19 13:20:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Still broken?
I suspect it would be duplicate of 54314.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54626
Bug #: 54626
Summary: Unexpected consequences of
__attribute__((optimize("-fno-PIC")))
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53695
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-19
13:31:19 UTC ---
Draft patch for the second issue. Note the FIXME for resetting to the declared
type.
Additionally, the patch fixes only the scalar issue, the same has also to be
done for arrays.
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53754
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53807
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53850
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53860
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53866
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-19
13:42:32 UTC ---
I don't think we necessarily want to fix this ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53876
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53948
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53952
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54061
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54063
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54626
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
--- Comment #1 from Richard G
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54114
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54117
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54128
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54131
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54150
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54627
Bug #: 54627
Summary: VRP uses lots of memory and compile-time
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: compile-time-hog, memory-h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54224
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54242
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54625
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-09-19 14:30:54 UTC ---
See also:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2012-09/msg00305.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2012-09/msg00308.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54305
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
eload1.c (choose_reload_regs): Also take into account secondary MEMs
to remove address replacements for inherited reloads.
(replaced_subreg): Move around.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20120919-1.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/reload1.c
t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54290
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24619
--- Comment #3 from Frank Ch. Eigler 2012-09-19
15:54:22 UTC ---
(test only, please ignore)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54628
Bug #: 54628
Summary: Problem using -flto and -static with Gold linker
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54628
--- Comment #1 from rob.ross at ymail dot com 2012-09-19 16:09:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 28221
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28221
Source code for a.cpp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54628
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-19
17:31:06 UTC ---
There seem to be other issues with OPTIONAL as well. The following code prints
twice 'T' when it should print 'F' and it segfaults for one version.
I haven't dared to combine it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54236
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo 2012-09-19 17:45:53
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Wed Sep 19 17:45:37 2012
New Revision: 191489
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191489
Log:
PR target/54236
* config/sh/sh.m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089
--- Comment #19 from Oleg Endo 2012-09-19
17:48:31 UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Wed Sep 19 17:48:25 2012
New Revision: 191490
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191490
Log:
PR target/54089
* config/sh/pre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54629
Bug #: 54629
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE (segfault) in index_in_loop_nest
tree-data-ref.h:608
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54629
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Tar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54581
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse 2012-09-19 20:45:11
UTC ---
Author: glisse
Date: Wed Sep 19 20:45:03 2012
New Revision: 191500
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191500
Log:
2012-09-19 Marc Glisse
PR c++/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54581
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40836
--- Comment #32 from Daniel Drake 2012-09-19 21:02:55
UTC ---
Using the preprocessed source that I attached, I can't reproduce this with
gcc-4.8 head (my previous test was with 4.7.x). Also, I have completed a glibc
compile with -march=iwm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54630
Bug #: 54630
Summary: GCC 4.8 --enable-languages=c build fails: Undefined
symbols: ___cxa_guard_acquire and ___cxa_guard_release
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54622
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw 2012-09-19
22:26:49 UTC ---
The reasons for the vector problems in big-endian largely fall into two areas:
1) Neon vector elements are numbered from the LSB of the vector register in
both big and litt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
--- Comment #34 from Larry Baker 2012-09-20 00:49:30
UTC ---
Created attachment 28223
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28223
Build patched GNU GCC 4.7.1 for ColdFire uClinux
Shell script to download, patch, and build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
--- Comment #35 from Larry Baker 2012-09-20 00:56:02
UTC ---
Created attachment 28224
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28224
Patches for GCC 4.6.4 (prerelease)
Patches to fix stack limit checking for GCC 4.6.4 (prerel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54631
Bug #: 54631
Summary: vxworks.c fails to compile
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35044
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2009-03-04 22:25:34 |2011-11-27
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35044
--- Comment #5 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2012-09-20 02:07:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Another testcase for ARC700 is: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-bitops-1.c -O1
Sorry, that's a mixup: the above is a testcase of an analogous
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54482
--- Comment #4 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-09-20
02:10:32 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Thu Sep 20 02:10:22 2012
New Revision: 191509
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191509
Log:
2012-09-18 Benjamin Kosnik
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28811
--- Comment #20 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-09-20
02:10:32 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Thu Sep 20 02:10:22 2012
New Revision: 191509
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191509
Log:
2012-09-18 Benjamin Kosnik
89 matches
Mail list logo