http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53002
--- Comment #4 from Steven Drake 2012-09-15 07:13:36
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Patch commited in svn id 87775.
Correction that should be svn id 187775
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53739
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54315
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54525
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse 2012-09-15 08:28:08
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> vpcmpgtq%xmm2, %xmm3, %xmm2
> vpcmpeqd%xmm3, %xmm3, %xmm3
[...]
> (also notice that for some reason all comparisons (I tried < <= > >= and even
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54500
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|avr-* |avr
Last reconfirmed|2012-09-06 00:0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50256
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Last reconfirmed|2011-09-01
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54516
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54540
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw 2012-09-15
09:57:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Author: rearnsha
> Date: Fri Sep 14 17:10:45 2012
> New Revision: 191307
>
Has probably made the post-reload issues go latent again.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54572
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54587
Bug #: 54587
Summary: Error with constant in arithmetic
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54587
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bratsinot at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51840
--- Comment #4 from Timo Kreuzer 2012-09-15
12:16:38 UTC ---
Update: I fought a bit with GCC and made clear that my Kung Fu is better than
GCC's ;-)
I solved this issue with a workaround. I forced a number of constraints upon
GCC, that made it c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54588
Bug #: 54588
Summary: Improved error messages by dropping out types
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36825
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54589
Bug #: 54589
Summary: [missed-optimization] struct offset add should be
folded into address calculation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #141 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-09-15 14:05:38 UTC ---
After the new IonMonkey JIT went in
(http://blog.mozilla.org/javascript/2012/09/12/ionmonkey-in-firefox-18/)
peak memory use went up. It is now 6.8GB (gcc-4.7 roughly the same
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54590
Bug #: 54590
Summary: Incorrect multi-inheritence bases layout
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54591
Bug #: 54591
Summary: sscanf format no more working
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54590
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54592
Bug #: 54592
Summary: [4.8 Regression] [missed-optimization] Cannot fuse SSE
move and add together
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-09-15
15:52:35 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Sat Sep 15 15:52:28 2012
New Revision: 191345
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191345
Log:
gcc/
PR target/54222
* config/avr/avr-fixe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42778
sgunderson at bigfoot dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sgunderson at bigfoot dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54593
Bug #: 54593
Summary: [missed-optimization] Move from SSE to integer
register goes through the stack without -march=native
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54593
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54593
--- Comment #2 from sgunderson at bigfoot dot com 2012-09-15 16:38:34 UTC ---
Interesting. So it's a conscious choice that “generic” does this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54591
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54588
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-09-15
16:46:55 UTC ---
We just were adding the types lately.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54593
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-09-15
16:50:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Interesting. So it's a conscious choice that “generic” does this?
Yes:
/* X86_TUNE_SSE_PARTIAL_REG_DEPENDENCY: In the Generic model we have a
conflic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54593
--- Comment #4 from sgunderson at bigfoot dot com 2012-09-15 16:54:28 UTC ---
I'm not sure if I understand the comment very well; it talks about Pentium 4,
but none of them run 64-bit code, do they?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54224
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |fortran
--- Comment #7 from jan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54224
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-15
17:47:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Here is a patch which should set TREE_USED for all procedure calls:
Does it still allow to optimize unused PRIVATE module procedures away?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54580
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54580
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-09-15
17:57:52 UTC ---
Or strictly, should be rejected by any 64-bit compiler with 32-bit int (which
is practically all of them) and any 32-bit compiler with 16-bit short.
Certainly invalid for g++ on LP64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54594
Bug #: 54594
Summary: [OOP] Type-bound ASSIGNMENTs (elemental + array
version) rejected as ambiguous
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54224
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-15 18:26:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > Here is a patch which should set TREE_USED for all procedure calls:
>
> Does it still allow to optimize unused PRIVATE module procedures away?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54594
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54594
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-15 18:46:06 UTC ---
Note: The same error appears also for a non-typebound generic interface:
module a_mod
type :: a
end type
interface ass
procedure :: a_ass, a_ass_sv
end interfa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54591
Uenal Mutlu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Component|c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54591
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54594
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-15 20:05:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Note: The same error appears also for a non-typebound generic interface:
... also if the second argument 'in' is removed from both procedures.
How
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54593
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2012-09-15 20:17:24
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I'm not sure if I understand the comment very well; it talks about Pentium 4,
> but none of them run 64-bit code, do they?
Wrong quote. It should be
/* X86_TU
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54593
--- Comment #6 from sgunderson at bigfoot dot com 2012-09-15 20:28:02 UTC ---
Ah. So basically it hurts AMD enough (the opposite doesn't hit Intel enough)
that the choice was made to make it that way generic too. Well, as long as it's
a deliberate
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54594
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54594
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-15 21:53:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Regtesting now ...
... finished without failures.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54595
Bug #: 54595
Summary: [4.8 Regression] symbol causes a section type conflict
with itself with -O -g -fdata-section
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54596
Bug #: 54596
Summary: seg fault building Eigen stuff with cygwin
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52887
--- Comment #23 from David Edelsohn 2012-09-16
02:36:27 UTC ---
I do not see the extraneous symbols using the example in comment #22 when
compiling with trunk. Also, the example G++ invocation does not enable any
optimizations.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54597
Bug #: 54597
Summary: Function can't return string without trailing spaces
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
50 matches
Mail list logo
