http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53727
--- Comment #7 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 07:25:46 UTC ---
The same problem with other file from ff 12:
LANG=C c++ -o nsPluginHost.o -c -fPIC -fno-rtti -march=prescott -mtune=prescott
-mfpmath=sse -msse2 -msse3 -O2 -fstack-protector --
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53727
--- Comment #8 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 07:28:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 27673
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27673
Preprocessed source from comment 7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53727
--- Comment #9 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 07:29:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 27674
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27674
Profile data from comment 7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
--- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak 2012-06-21 07:33:34
UTC ---
Patch that fixes all valgrind issues, but I have no idea if it is OK or not:
--cut here--
Index: var-tracking.c
===
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53713
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52887
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-21
08:23:56 UTC ---
*** Bug 53713 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53726
--- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-06-21 08:46:11 UTC ---
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53726
>
> --- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu 2012-06-20 15:36:09
> UTC --
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53741
Bug #: 53741
Summary: ICE on lambda calling static template member function
with explicit template argument specification
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53742
Bug #: 53742
Summary: bad assembler output when compiling with LTO and PGO
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53742
--- Comment #1 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 09:03:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 27676
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27676
Preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53742
--- Comment #2 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 09:04:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 27677
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27677
Profile data
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53742
--- Comment #3 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 09:05:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 27678
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27678
Full c++ console output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53742
--- Comment #4 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 09:07:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 27679
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27679
Assembler output that rejected by as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53742
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2012-06-21
09:12:50 UTC ---
What version of binutils are you using? Also are you using gold or GNU ld?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53743
Bug #: 53743
Summary: ICE when compiling firefox with PGO and LTO
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53743
--- Comment #1 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 09:15:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 27681
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27681
Profile data 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53743
--- Comment #2 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 09:17:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 27682
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27682
full gcc -v output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53743
--- Comment #3 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 09:19:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 27683
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27683
Preprocessed source 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53743
--- Comment #4 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 09:21:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 27684
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27684
Profile data 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53742
--- Comment #6 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 09:22:36 UTC ---
GNU assembler version 2.22.0 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) using BFD version (GNU
Binutils) 2.22.0.20120323
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53743
--- Comment #5 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 09:23:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 27685
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27685
full gcc -v output for source 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53113
--- Comment #4 from Martin 2012-06-21 09:25:21 UTC ---
( And the "different story" is bug 53731...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53731 )
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53742
--- Comment #7 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 09:27:46 UTC ---
I have two ld: GNU and GOLD.
Problem appears before ld call, but with such gcc keys ld GOLD must be called.
It version is GNU gold (GNU Binutils 2.22.0.20120323) 1.11.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53740
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53742
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-21
09:35:16 UTC ---
Surely not using -freorder-blocks-and-partition will fix this? The actual
bug should not be LTO or PGO related.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53743
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-21
09:47:20 UTC ---
Confirmed on input1 with
> /space/rguenther/install/gcc-4.7.1/bin/g++ -c t.ii
> -freorder-blocks-and-partition -fno-exceptions -std=gnu++0x -fprofile-use
> -fprofile-correction
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53744
Bug #: 53744
Summary: gcov version oscillates between 407* and 407p on
branches
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53742
--- Comment #9 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 10:07:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Surely not using -freorder-blocks-and-partition will fix this?
Yes, it fixes.
>The actual
> bug should not be LTO or PGO related.
Without profile d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38756
Peter A. Bigot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bigotp at acm dot org
--- Comment #1 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38756
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-21
12:01:14 UTC ---
I can't see where you would place this change from looking at the function.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38756
--- Comment #3 from Peter A. Bigot 2012-06-21 12:04:34
UTC ---
commit af66de00843896ad5d2980952994b31cadbf8421
Author: Peter A. Bigot
Date: Thu Jun 21 06:35:44 2012 -0500
Anticipatory patch for PR middle-end/38756
Do not truncate to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38756
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-06-21 12:12:24 UTC ---
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, bigotp at acm dot org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38756
>
> --- Comment #3 from Peter A. Bigot 2012-06-21
> 12:04:34 UTC --
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53743
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53688
--- Comment #4 from Michael Matz 2012-06-21 12:18:31
UTC ---
Author: matz
Date: Thu Jun 21 12:18:23 2012
New Revision: 188852
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188852
Log:
PR middle-end/53688
* builtins.c (get_memory_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38756
--- Comment #5 from Peter A. Bigot 2012-06-21 12:24:38
UTC ---
Yes, that's where it happens. Your proposal makes sense; I've just been trying
to avoid changing existing behavior on "normal" platforms.
I'll give the unconditional solution a try
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53726
--- Comment #19 from Vladimir Yakovlev 2012-06-21
12:46:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > I've tried without static. Runtimes is still the same.
>
> It doesn't match what I saw. On Atom D510:
>
> /export/gnu/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53732
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Morin 2012-06-21
12:48:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 27686
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27686
"shot in the dark" patch[*]
[*] Carefully crafted with love and patience, using the ancestral methods
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53726
--- Comment #20 from H.J. Lu 2012-06-21 12:50:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
>
> I rechecked there is no regression without static on Sundy Bridge nor Atom.
Great. Please verify that -static isn't used on eembc and SPEC
CPU 2000/2006 run
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53688
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53726
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53745
Bug #: 53745
Summary: Bitshifted value (1 << 31) within enumerator class is
calculated incorrectly during compilation.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
Ulrich Weigand changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53745
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53745
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-21
13:36:24 UTC ---
The initializer must be converted constant expression of type unsigned long, so
by my reading it's ill-formed because (1<<31) has type int and is negative so
requires a narrowing con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53741
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53646
--- Comment #18 from Michael Matz 2012-06-21 14:36:29
UTC ---
Just today I had to debug another crash in our package management code.
This time a c++98 library picked up a std::list operator= from a c++11
library resulting in a crash. See
http
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53694
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2012-06-21
14:39:32 UTC ---
Actually, I am no longer sure that this PR is valid - nor is Richard Maine in
c.l.f. Janus seems to have the same doubts, if I read comment 5 correctly.
The standard seems to make a d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53646
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-21
14:46:22 UTC ---
Do you have an opinion on PR 53673 ?
Would having those symbols make debugging such problems easier, or did you
already know there was a mix of c++98 and c++11 objects and the diffi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53732
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-06-21
15:07:58 UTC ---
> [*] Carefully crafted with love and patience, using the ancestral methods and
> tools available to the windows users (i.e. Notepad.exe).
> In other words, the patch may not ap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
--- Comment #12 from Uros Bizjak 2012-06-21 15:23:51
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Patch that fixes all valgrind issues, but I have no idea if it is OK or not:
The patch doesn't pass the bootstrap.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53646
--- Comment #20 from Michael Matz 2012-06-21 15:25:59
UTC ---
As I stumbled over this problem complex recently already I had a hunch that it
might again be a 11/98 mixture. Having the symbols would have made that a
certainty. But it wouldn't ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46125
Adrian Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adrian.m.smith at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53646
--- Comment #21 from Michael Matz 2012-06-21 15:32:07
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> certainty. But it wouldn't have helped me that much further. I still would
> have had to find out which functions were causing the wild write in order
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53746
Bug #: 53746
Summary: [lto] segfault in std::vector::__base_ctor
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16331
Christian Häggström changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at kalvdans dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53746
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53745
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39654
--- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-06-21 18:47:06
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Thu Jun 21 18:47:01 2012
New Revision: 188858
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188858
Log:
PR 39654 FTELL intrinsic function return type.
fron
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50048
nightstrike changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nightstrike at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39654
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
Otherwise,
$ gnatmake -gnatwa -gnatv aliasing.ads
gcc -c -gnatwa -gnatv aliasing.ads
GNAT 4.8.0 20120621 (experimental)
Copyright 1992-2012, Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Compiling: aliasing.ads (source file time stamp: 2012-06-21 19:52:03)
==Error messages for source file:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53702
--- Comment #4 from meadori at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-21 20:20:36 UTC ---
Author: meadori
Date: Thu Jun 21 20:20:30 2012
New Revision: 188860
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188860
Log:
PR c/53702
* c-decl.c (c_push
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53732
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-06-21
20:32:48 UTC ---
> Well, it did!-) The patch even fixed the PR (no regression with -m32, further
> testing in progress).
Testing finished without anything to report.
> I wonder if
>
> - if (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53702
meadori at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53651
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53682
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-22
01:29:33 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Jun 22 01:29:28 2012
New Revision: 188866
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188866
Log:
PR debug/53682
* cselib.c (promote_debug_loc): D
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53671
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-22
01:30:21 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Jun 22 01:30:16 2012
New Revision: 188868
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188868
Log:
PR debug/53671
PR debug/49888
* alias.c (memrefs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49888
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-22
01:30:23 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Jun 22 01:30:16 2012
New Revision: 188868
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188868
Log:
PR debug/53671
PR debug/49888
* alias.c (memrefs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53671
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-22
01:33:26 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Jun 22 01:33:21 2012
New Revision: 188869
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188869
Log:
PR debug/53671
PR debug/49888
* var-tracking.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53671
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-22
01:33:26 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Jun 22 01:33:21 2012
New Revision: 188869
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188869
Log:
PR debug/53671
PR debug/49888
* var-tracking.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49888
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-22
01:33:27 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Jun 22 01:33:21 2012
New Revision: 188869
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188869
Log:
PR debug/53671
PR debug/49888
* var-tracking.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954
--- Comment #20 from nightstrike 2012-06-22
02:05:45 UTC ---
As we're in 4.8 now, consider this a friendly ping :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28145
nightstrike changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nightstrike at gmail dot
73 matches
Mail list logo
