http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53694
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-21 14:39:32 UTC --- Actually, I am no longer sure that this PR is valid - nor is Richard Maine in c.l.f. Janus seems to have the same doubts, if I read comment 5 correctly. The standard seems to make a distinction between 'generic type-bound procedure' and 'generic procedure name'.
