[Bug libstdc++/53270] Error when bootstrapping gcc on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270 --- Comment #32 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-19 07:42:30 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Tue Jun 19 07:42:21 2012 New Revision: 188768 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188768 Log: PR libstdc++/53270 * config/os/gnu-linux/

[Bug c++/53574] ICE with -fstack-usage

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53574 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/53686] gnatchop -r raises STORAGE_ERROR on all inputs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53686 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/53688] [4.8 Regression] 191.fma3d in SPEC CPU 2000 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53688 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||georggcc at googlemail dot

[Bug middle-end/53708] [4.8 Regression] Many failures of the objc tests with -O3 -fnext-runtime and -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53708 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-06-19 08:46:49 UTC --- Works for me too on x86_64-apple-darwin10 and powerpc-apple-darwin9.

[Bug fortran/53718] [4.7/4.8 regression] [OOP] gfortran generates asm label twice in the same output file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53718 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2

[Bug debug/53719] can't display x87 stack information

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53719 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/8743] receiving result from __builtin_return_address() beyond stack top causes segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8743 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/53700] [4.7 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53700 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/53708] [4.8 Regression] Many failures of the objc tests with -O3 -fnext-runtime and -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53708 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-19 09:19:17 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jun 19 09:19:07 2012 New Revision: 188771 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188771 Log: 2012-06-19 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug middle-end/53708] [4.8 Regression] Many failures of the objc tests with -O3 -fnext-runtime and -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53708 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/53657] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] pair(pair&&) move constructor is non-trivial

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53657 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|jason at gcc

[Bug fortran/53694] [OOP] GENERIC type-bound procs should be available without part-ref syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53694 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-19 09:52:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > > > See also: > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/comp.lang.fortran/YDt3j0--1Do > > Note: That link does not seem to work. > > Try: > > h

[Bug fortran/53718] [4.7/4.8 regression] [OOP] gfortran generates asm label twice in the same output file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53718 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-19 10:35:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Could it be revision 181505? Very likely. If it is, I'm betting on the PR50640 part of that commit.

[Bug fortran/53694] [OOP] GENERIC type-bound procs should be available without part-ref syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53694 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-19 10:46:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Btw, I'm not completely convinced yet that the code in comment #0 (and #4) is > really legal. In any case, here is a simple draft patch, which make

[Bug libstdc++/53270] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Error when bootstrapping gcc on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|4.7.2 | Summary|[4.6 Regression] Er

[Bug fortran/53718] [4.7/4.8 regression] [OOP] gfortran generates asm label twice in the same output file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53718 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-19 13:13:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > > Could it be revision 181505? > > Very likely. If it is, I'm betting on the PR50640 part of that commit. Indeed the following patch, which is pra

[Bug middle-end/53676] [4.7/4.8 regression] empty loop is not always removed now

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53676 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/53695] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in dfs_enumerate_from, at cfganal.c:1221 with -O2 -ftracer and labels/gotos

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53695 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rakdver at gcc dot gnu.org Known

[Bug c++/53722] New: [C++0x] Returning implicit conversion class with deleted copy constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53722 Bug #: 53722 Summary: [C++0x] Returning implicit conversion class with deleted copy constructor Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCON

[Bug c++/53722] [C++0x] Returning implicit conversion class with deleted copy constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53722 --- Comment #1 from George Galeev 2012-06-19 14:29:08 UTC --- Work fine with real pointers and mutex locking in temp object Locker.

[Bug c++/53722] [C++0x] Returning implicit conversion class with deleted copy constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53722 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/53704] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in based_loc_descr, at dwarf2out.c:10027 after revision 188621

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53704 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2012-06-19 15:04:09 UTC --- I guess is_fortran never returns true on Darwin, which would mean that the debug info for Fortran is already pretty broken...

[Bug debug/53704] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in based_loc_descr, at dwarf2out.c:10027 after revision 188621

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53704 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2012-06-19 15:06:39 UTC --- Created attachment 27654 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27654 Tentative fix

[Bug debug/53704] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in based_loc_descr, at dwarf2out.c:10027 after revision 188621

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53704 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2012-06-19 15:13:55 UTC --- > I guess is_fortran never returns true on Darwin, which would mean that the > debug info for Fortran is already pretty broken... Likewise for Ada.

[Bug debug/53704] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in based_loc_descr, at dwarf2out.c:10027 after revision 188621

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53704 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2012-06-19 15:20:33 UTC --- Created attachment 27655 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27655 Tentative fix #2 Slight variation.

[Bug fortran/41951] [OOP] Not diagnosing ambiguous operators (TB vs. INTERFACE)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41951 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-19 15:53:02 UTC --- Here is a reduced version of comment 2, which is invalid according to comment 10: module m_sort implicit none type, abstract :: sort_t contains generic :: assign

[Bug c++/53723] New: [C++11] Variadic template specialisation fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53723 Bug #: 53723 Summary: [C++11] Variadic template specialisation fails Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c++/53723] [C++11] Variadic template specialisation fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53723 --- Comment #1 from Seth Carnegie 2012-06-19 17:16:03 UTC --- Also you might want to know that Clang 3.2 accepts the code. There was a StackOverflow question about it here: http://stackoverflow.com/a/11069116/726361

[Bug c++/53723] [C++11] Variadic template specialisation fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53723 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/53718] [4.7/4.8 regression] [OOP] gfortran generates asm label twice in the same output file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53718 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-06-19 17:36:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > Indeed the following patch, which is practically a revert of the trans-decl.c > part of the above commit, makes the errors go away: ... Confirmed for

[Bug fortran/53694] [OOP] GENERIC type-bound procs should be available without part-ref syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53694 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-19 21:56:09 UTC --- One problem with the patch in comment #6 is that it produces double error messages for type-bound generics, e.g. on typebound_generic_{1,10,11}.

[Bug c++/53524] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bogus and unsuppressible enum comparison warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53524 --- Comment #25 from Paul Pluzhnikov 2012-06-19 21:56:31 UTC --- Google ref: b/6695435

[Bug target/53724] New: ICE when using the 'd' asm operand modifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53724 Bug #: 53724 Summary: ICE when using the 'd' asm operand modifier Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement P

[Bug bootstrap/52887] Bootstrap on AIX failure: Undefined symbol: .std::function::function(std::function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52887 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/53725] New: Prototype does not match error if the definition of the ctor is separated from its declaration.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53725 Bug #: 53725 Summary: Prototype does not match error if the definition of the ctor is separated from its declaration. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3

[Bug c++/53651] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] seg fault when specifying using decltype(...)::method

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53651 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2012-06-20 01:18:03 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jun 20 01:17:59 2012 New Revision: 188807 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188807 Log: PR c++/53651 * name-lookup.c (constructor_n

[Bug bootstrap/52887] Bootstrap on AIX failure: Undefined symbol: .std::function::function(std::function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52887 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-20 01:35:58 UTC --- OK, I'll deal with it asap. I have quite a queue of patches to test and commit at present though.

[Bug c++/53725] Prototype does not match error if the definition of the ctor is separated from its declaration and attributes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53725 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONF

[Bug c++/53220] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ mis-compiles compound literals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53220 --- Comment #18 from Paul Pluzhnikov 2012-06-20 01:59:01 UTC --- FWIW, it appears that the new error is too strict. It rejects this source, which (AFAIU) is entirely kosher: #include void fn(int arr[]) { for (int j = 0; j < 5; ++j) print

[Bug bootstrap/52887] Bootstrap on AIX failure: Undefined symbol: .std::function::function(std::function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52887 --- Comment #15 from Daniel Richard G. 2012-06-20 04:10:28 UTC --- David, thank you for commenting; I have a better appreciation now of how AIX is a different animal from most, and indeed may be doing things more correctly than other systems on t

[Bug c/53726] New: [4.8 Regression] aes test performance drop for eembc_2_0_peak_32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53726 Bug #: 53726 Summary: [4.8 Regression] aes test performance drop for eembc_2_0_peak_32 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/53726] [4.8 Regression] aes test performance drop for eembc_2_0_peak_32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53726 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Yakovlev 2012-06-20 06:13:26 UTC --- Created attachment 27658 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27658 Test case and assemblers