http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53694
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-19 09:52:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > > > See also: > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/comp.lang.fortran/YDt3j0--1Do > > Note: That link does not seem to work. > > Try: > > http://www.rhinocerus.net/forum/lang-fortran/708232-there-way-do-following.html The correct google groups link would be: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/YDt3j0--1Do Btw, I'm not completely convinced yet that the code in comment #0 (and #4) is really legal. No one in the c.l.f. thread has brought up a quote from the standard which clearly shows that referencing a type-bound generic is legal without part-ref syntax. For me, to most convincing reference up to now is this quote from F08:12.4.3.4.5 (though it still sounds a bit 'cloudy' to me): NOTE 12.10 In most scoping units, the possible sources of procedures with a particular generic identifier are the accessible interface blocks and the generic bindings other than names for the accessible objects in that scoping unit.
