[Bug tree-optimization/33512] Simple bitwise simplification missed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33512 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-24 07:05:15 UTC --- Author: pinskia Date: Tue Apr 24 07:05:09 2012 New Revision: 186749 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186749 Log: 2012-04-24 Andrew Pinski PR tree-opt/33

[Bug tree-optimization/33512] Simple bitwise simplification missed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33512 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/53100] New: Optimize __int128 with range information

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53100 Bug #: 53100 Summary: Optimize __int128 with range information Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Prio

[Bug middle-end/53010] [4.8 Regression] crash due to null ptr deref

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53010 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/53033] [avr]: Wrong register number for 3-byte loads via X

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53033 --- Comment #6 from Michal Hlavinka 2012-04-24 07:26:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Fixed in 4.7.1 verified Thanks

[Bug tree-optimization/33512] Simple bitwise simplification missed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33512 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug fortran/53086] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |fortran --- Comment #6 from Richard Gu

[Bug tree-optimization/53098] [4.8 Regression] tree-vect-loop.c:1414:19: error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Werror=sign-compare]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53098 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/53098] [4.8 Regression] tree-vect-loop.c:1414:19: error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Werror=sign-compare]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53098 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-24 08:06:33 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Apr 24 08:06:20 2012 New Revision: 186754 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186754 Log: 2012-04-24 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug c/53095] std=gnu99 atof x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53095 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/53092] ICE using -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53092 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/53089] [4.8 Regression] gfortran.dg/coarray/atomic_1.f90 and gfortran.dg/coarray/registering_1.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53089 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||JoaquinMonleon at gmail dot

[Bug middle-end/53088] [4.8 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr39082-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53088 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/33512] Simple bitwise simplification missed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33512 --- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-24 08:19:59 UTC --- Patch which I am testing: Index: tree-ssa-forwprop.c === --- tree-ssa-forwprop.c(revision 186755) +++ tree-ssa-forw

[Bug tree-optimization/33512] Simple bitwise simplification missed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33512 --- Comment #14 from Kai Tietz 2012-04-24 08:30:49 UTC --- Hmm, I have right now in my tree Index: tree-ssa-forwprop.c === --- tree-ssa-forwprop.c (revision 186753) +++ tree-ssa-for

[Bug c++/53078] [C++11] Wrong diagnostic "no return statement in function returning non-void" on lambdas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53078 mattipee at yahoo dot co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mattipee at yahoo dot co.uk

[Bug tree-optimization/33512] Simple bitwise simplification missed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33512 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-24 08:37:52 UTC --- >Hmm, I have right now in my tree The most common case is with b being a constant which is why I only looked into that case.

[Bug fortran/53086] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-24 08:38:43 UTC --- Found the discussion: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-05/msg00079.html

[Bug translation/52984] Different information message in Turkish locale.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52984 --- Comment #2 from Yaşar Arabacı 2012-04-24 08:43:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > The translations are handled by the translation project. Translation issues > should be reported directly to them rather to us. Do you mean this: http://tr

[Bug middle-end/31094] Support annotating function parameters as read-only and/or non-escaping

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31094 Sylwester Arabas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||slayoo at staszic dot

[Bug c++/25973] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong warning: control reaches end of non-void function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25973 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|vries at

[Bug tree-optimization/33512] Simple bitwise simplification missed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33512 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/53086] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-24 09:14:57 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2003-09/msg02301.html

[Bug fortran/52428] [RFC] I/O: READING of "-huge()-1": Integer overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52428 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jb at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/53086] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-24 09:17:23 UTC --- I think http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-07/msg00307.html is also referencing it too.

[Bug c++/53078] [C++11] Wrong diagnostic "no return statement in function returning non-void" on lambdas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53078 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/52845] non-void return type deduced for lambda with empty compound statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52845 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||M8R-gt1qwe at mailinator

[Bug fortran/53086] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086 --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-24 09:29:10 UTC --- A "fix" would be for example Index: gcc/expr.c === --- gcc/expr.c (revision 186757) +++ gcc/expr.c (working copy)

[Bug c++/53078] [C++11] Wrong diagnostic "no return statement in function returning non-void" on lambdas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53078 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/52999] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE, segmentation fault in c_tree_printer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52999 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-04-24 09:35:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > This occurs in default_elf_select_section. For example, You are looking at wrong spot. What happens on this testcase is default_elf_select_rtx_section and

[Bug middle-end/53084] [4.7/4.8 Regression] GCC cannot handle array initialization of string constant with point arithmetic properly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53084 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/25973] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong warning: control reaches end of non-void function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25973 ssomers at opnet dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/53101] New: Recognize casts to sub-vectors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53101 Bug #: 53101 Summary: Recognize casts to sub-vectors Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug c++/25973] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong warning: control reaches end of non-void function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25973 --- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-24 10:30:45 UTC --- Noone cares about 4.4 bugs now, that release has reached end-of-life, but the problem isn't fixed in 4.5, 4.6 or 4.7 so this isn't FIXED

[Bug tree-optimization/52979] [4.7/4.8 Regression] likely wrong code bug w/packed bitfields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52979 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-04-24 10:47:04 UTC --- Doesn't apparently need a loop, the following fails on 4.7 branch and older trunk with -O2 -ftree-vectorize as well. The dummy foo function is important to reproduce it, apparently ot

[Bug c++/53102] New: Misplaced 'typename' gives access to private type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53102 Bug #: 53102 Summary: Misplaced 'typename' gives access to private type Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/53101] Recognize casts to sub-vectors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53101 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status

[Bug fortran/52428] [RFC] I/O: READING of "-huge()-1": Integer overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52428 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27228|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/53102] Misplaced 'typename' gives access to private type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53102 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Status|UNCO

[Bug tree-optimization/52979] [4.7/4.8 Regression] likely wrong code bug w/packed bitfields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52979 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-04-24 11:41:47 UTC --- This is a kind of dup of PR48124, certainly on the 4.7 branch that doesn't even try to handle it, and on the trunk (after Honza's changes one needs to swap struct S a = { 1 }; static s

[Bug tree-optimization/52891] [4.8 Regression] ICE in adjust_bool_pattern

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52891 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/53065] ICE replace_reg_with_saved_mem, at caller-save.c:1125

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53065 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/51033] generic vector subscript and shuffle support was not added to C++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033 --- Comment #23 from Marc Glisse 2012-04-24 11:57:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #21) > What does it mean "exercise the backend a lot"? Do you mean it takes a lot of > time? I think so. > I haven't looked at the tests, but I think it is not a

[Bug tree-optimization/52979] [4.7/4.8 Regression] likely wrong code bug w/packed bitfields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52979 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-24 11:57:53 UTC --- But it uses TYPE_SIZE_UNIT to constrain it which is 5, and maxbitsize 40. Which then leads to a representative of BLKmode via if (mode == VOIDmode) { /* We really want

[Bug c++/51989] std::deque::iterator recognised as container

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51989 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/53085] writes to volatile struct members is missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53085 --- Comment #4 from brag 2012-04-24 12:27:29 UTC --- Alexander Monakov, As for me it's ok to treat whole struct as non-volatile even if it has a volatile members when doing smth like this: struct ss0 a,b; a=b; a=b; Simple example with class: cla

[Bug tree-optimization/52979] [4.7/4.8 Regression] likely wrong code bug w/packed bitfields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52979 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-24 12:28:24 UTC --- Btw, get_best_mode for Breakpoint 6, get_best_mode (bitsize=6, bitpos=31, bitregion_start=0, bitregion_end=39, align=128, largest_mode=DImode, volatilep=0) happily returns DI

[Bug tree-optimization/53085] writes to volatile struct members is missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53085 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/53093] [4.8 Regression]: tls/alias-1.c ICE, emutls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53093 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/53089] [4.8 Regression] gfortran.dg/coarray/atomic_1.f90 and gfortran.dg/coarray/registering_1.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53089 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2

[Bug tree-optimization/53085] writes to volatile struct members is missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53085 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-24 13:13:26 UTC --- Patch that applies to all maintained branches (the bug is also in 4.5!) Index: gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c === --- gcc/tree-s

[Bug fortran/40766] this fortran program is too slow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40766 --- Comment #23 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-04-24 13:13:13 UTC --- The glibc libm work has mainly been oriented at correctness rather than performance, and postdates the 2.15 release so will be new in 2.16 (the 2.15 announcement cam

[Bug rtl-optimization/52983] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in df_uses_record, at df-scan.c:3243

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52983 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/52639] ice in supportable_widening_operation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52639 --- Comment #5 from Vincent Lefèvre 2012-04-24 13:22:08 UTC --- Same problem here under Debian/unstable (x86_64), with: gcc-snapshot -O3 -march=native -std=gnu99 -c ice-setf.i and the testcase below, using: gcc (Debian 20120407-1) 4.8.0 201204

[Bug target/47197] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7153 on AltiVec code (vec_dst)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47197 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/53072] automatically set Init() only if option was not set in some other way

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53072 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-04-24 13:59:10 UTC --- On Sun, 22 Apr 2012, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > The infrastructure to detect whether options have been set explicitly seems to > be there, but it is not clear ho

[Bug c++/52639] ice in supportable_widening_operation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52639 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-24 14:04:42 UTC --- Supposedly fixed by 2012-04-10 Ulrich Weigand PR tree-optimization/52870 * tree-vect-patterns.c (vect_recog_widen_mult_pattern): Verify that presumed pa

[Bug c/53072] automatically set Init() only if option was not set in some other way

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53072 --- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-24 14:10:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > On Sun, 22 Apr 2012, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > This is explicitly not a detailed design; anyone implementing it would > need to flesh out the d

[Bug c/53091] Const assignment fails in GCC 4.2, 4.4, 4.6, 4.7 - works fine in clang

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53091 --- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-04-24 14:25:06 UTC --- There is no requirement to accept this static initializer, but the code does try to be lax about constants in initializers (there is no requirement to reject it eith

[Bug c++/53000] Conditional operator does not behave as standardized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53000 --- Comment #1 from İsmail "cartman" Dönmez 2012-04-24 14:32:34 UTC --- clang people have the following patch proposed as a workaround to this issue: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/www/libstdc%2B%2B4.7-clang11.patch?revision=154890

[Bug c/53091] static initializer accepted by clang but not by gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53091 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/53085] writes to volatile struct members is missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53085 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-24 14:41:59 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Apr 24 14:41:49 2012 New Revision: 186764 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186764 Log: 2012-04-24 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug tree-optimization/53085] writes to volatile struct members is missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53085 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-24 14:43:01 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Apr 24 14:42:53 2012 New Revision: 186765 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186765 Log: 2012-04-24 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug c/53072] automatically set Init() only if option was not set in some other way

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53072 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-04-24 14:43:16 UTC --- On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Say we have: A enables B enables C. Do we actually need to track that C was > enabled by B or by A? Sorry I canno

[Bug tree-optimization/53085] [4.7/4.8 Regression] writes to volatile struct members is missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53085 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/53000] Conditional operator does not behave as standardized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53000 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/53086] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086 --- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl 2012-04-24 14:49:18 UTC --- On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 07:57:43AM +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086 > > Richard Guenther changed: > >What|

[Bug c/53072] automatically set Init() only if option was not set in some other way

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53072 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-24 14:49:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > > Init() should I think ideally be just for the defaults (with _set > replacing the present uses of -1 or 2 in Init to mean "not set"). Do you think

[Bug c/53091] static initializer accepted by clang but not by gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53091 --- Comment #14 from bugs at m8y dot org 2012-04-24 15:00:42 UTC --- Heh. Thanks, but our current target is clang->llvm, I was just surprised that gcc did not accept it. The codebase being converted by unc0rr's haskell-based tokeniser is pascal act

[Bug middle-end/53088] [4.8 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr39082-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53088 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2012-04-24 15:07:21 UTC --- At few places in cgraph code we set location to get those late diagnostics right. It sort of makes sense for function wide diagnostics, but it is not this one. (gdb) bt #0 inform (loca

[Bug c/53072] automatically set Init() only if option was not set in some other way

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53072 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-04-24 15:09:34 UTC --- On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53072 > > --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-24 > 14:

[Bug middle-end/53088] [4.8 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr39082-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53088 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2012-04-24 15:12:36 UTC --- I guess get_curr_insn_source_location is what I neeed...

[Bug bootstrap/52850] Linker path ends up using wrong zlib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52850 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Richard G. 2012-04-24 15:18:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > That sounds like an user problem rather than a GCC issue. >From the "Installing GCC: Configuration" doc: --with-system-zlib Use installed `zlib

[Bug target/53065] ICE replace_reg_with_saved_mem, at caller-save.c:1125

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53065 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-04-24 15:21:36 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Apr 24 15:21:29 2012 New Revision: 186768 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186768 Log: PR target/53065 * config/avr/avr.h (HARD_R

[Bug target/53065] ICE replace_reg_with_saved_mem, at caller-save.c:1125

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53065 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-04-24 15:23:51 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Apr 24 15:23:46 2012 New Revision: 186770 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186770 Log: Backport from 2012-04-24 mainline r186768.

[Bug target/53065] ICE replace_reg_with_saved_mem, at caller-save.c:1125

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53065 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/52979] [4.7/4.8 Regression] likely wrong code bug w/packed bitfields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52979 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug middle-end/53103] New: bug locating unsigned type for non-standard precision

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53103 Bug #: 53103 Summary: bug locating unsigned type for non-standard precision Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/47197] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7153 on AltiVec code (vec_dst)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47197 --- Comment #4 from William J. Schmidt 2012-04-24 15:52:04 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Tue Apr 24 15:51:58 2012 New Revision: 186771 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186771 Log: gcc: 2012-04-24 Bill Schmidt PR ta

[Bug target/47197] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7153 on AltiVec code (vec_dst)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47197 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53102] Misplaced 'typename' gives access to private type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53102 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-24 16:19:38 UTC --- >(N.B. using 'typenme' outside of templates is valid in C++11) That was a Defect report. I think my patch to fix PR22154 was not a complete one.

[Bug c++/52363] Presence/absence of -pedantic compilation affects run-time behavior

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52363 --- Comment #12 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 16:25:33 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Apr 24 16:25:15 2012 New Revision: 186774 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186774 Log: /cp 2012-04-24 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/52363] Presence/absence of -pedantic compilation affects run-time behavior

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52363 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug go/51874] Many libgo testsuite failures on IRIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874 --- Comment #16 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-04-24 16:33:13 UTC --- At some point, can you update this bug with the current set of test failures using Go on Irix? No rush.

[Bug tree-optimization/52633] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Compiler ICE in vect_is_simple_use_1 (ARM)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52633 --- Comment #2 from Ulrich Weigand 2012-04-24 16:52:59 UTC --- Some more details on what's going on here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg01486.html

[Bug tree-optimization/52891] [4.8 Regression] ICE in adjust_bool_pattern

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52891 --- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-04-24 17:08:28 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Apr 24 17:08:20 2012 New Revision: 186775 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186775 Log: PR testsuite/52641 PR tree-optimizations/5

[Bug testsuite/52641] Test cases fail for 16-bit int targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-04-24 17:08:28 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Apr 24 17:08:20 2012 New Revision: 186775 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186775 Log: PR testsuite/52641 PR tree-optimizations/5

[Bug tree-optimization/52891] [4.8 Regression] ICE in adjust_bool_pattern

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52891 --- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-04-24 17:19:03 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Apr 24 17:18:54 2012 New Revision: 186776 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186776 Log: PR testsuite/52641 PR tree-optimizations/5

[Bug testsuite/52641] Test cases fail for 16-bit int targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-04-24 17:19:03 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Apr 24 17:18:54 2012 New Revision: 186776 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186776 Log: PR testsuite/52641 PR tree-optimizations/5

[Bug c++/39970] gcc accepts the . dot operator in template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39970 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/52639] ice in supportable_widening_operation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52639 --- Comment #7 from dcb 2012-04-24 18:08:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Supposedly fixed by > > 2012-04-10 Ulrich Weigand > > PR tree-optimization/52870 > * tree-vect-patterns.c (vect_recog_widen_mult_pattern): Verify t

[Bug middle-end/52999] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE, segmentation fault in c_tree_printer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52999 --- Comment #10 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-04-24 18:18:07 UTC --- On 4/24/2012 5:35 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > What happens on this testcase is > default_elf_select_rtx_section and the PA specific part of that is just that >

[Bug target/53065] ICE replace_reg_with_saved_mem, at caller-save.c:1125

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53065 --- Comment #7 from webbot at webbot dot org.uk 2012-04-24 18:34:41 UTC --- Don't profess to understand the thread comments - but MANY THANKS for fixing in 4.7.1. Brilliant turnaround

[Bug go/52359] time test is too load-sensitive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52359 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53000] Conditional operator does not behave as standardized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53000 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marc.glisse at normalesup

[Bug middle-end/53104] New: convert_move on MODE_PARTIAL_INT does not look for existing conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53104 Bug #: 53104 Summary: convert_move on MODE_PARTIAL_INT does not look for existing conversion Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIR

[Bug go/52462] Several libgo tests FAIL intermittently: ../testdata races

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52462 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug go/52583] Several new go testsuite failues on Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583 --- Comment #16 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-04-24 20:43:33 UTC --- I think that the problems with the log test should be fixed now.

[Bug fortran/52428] [RFC] I/O: READING of "-huge()-1": Integer overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52428 --- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-04-24 21:44:06 UTC --- See also PR 36515

  1   2   >