http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53072
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> 2012-04-24 15:09:34 UTC --- On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53072 > > --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-24 > 14:49:54 UTC --- > (In reply to comment #3) > > > > Init() should I think ideally be just for the defaults (with _set > > replacing the present uses of -1 or 2 in Init to mean "not set"). > > Do you think it is possible to implement just this last part with _set being a > boolean? The code handling -Wb would still need to check explicitly that -Wc > is > "not set", but the .opt file infrastructure will take care to set the value > Init() when "not set" after all command-line options have been processed. It may be possible - you'd need to avoid implicit setting marking the implied option as "set" - and I don't think delaying processing of Init() will actually be helpful anyway.
