http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52241
Bug #: 52241
Summary: Performance degradation of 447.dealII on corei7 at
spec2006_base32.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52242
Bug #: 52242
Summary: [4.7 regression] libgomp.c/atomic-2.c failure on s390x
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52242
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||s390x-ibm-linux
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39055
--- Comment #20 from Jason Merrill 2012-02-14
08:39:55 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 14 08:39:51 2012
New Revision: 184199
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184199
Log:
PR c++/39055
* decl.c (local_variable_p_wa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #22 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-14
08:39:59 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 14 08:39:55 2012
New Revision: 184200
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184200
Log:
2012-02-14 Richard Guenther
PR lto/52
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39055
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52097
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-02-14 09:02:58 UTC ---
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52097
>
> Aldy Hernandez changed:
>
>What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52210
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-14
09:16:05 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 14 09:16:01 2012
New Revision: 184201
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184201
Log:
PR tree-optimization/52210
* tree-vect-slp.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52181
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52243
Bug #: 52243
Summary: Avoid reallocation for: array1 = array1 / scalar for
performance
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52210
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52097
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
Bug #: 52244
Summary: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong code for function
returning union between int and _Bool at O > 2, with
no-early-inlining
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-*-darwin9 |powerpc-*-darwin9,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-*-darwin9, |*-*-darwin9
|i?86-*-darwi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Blocks|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52245
Bug #: 52245
Summary: translatable string: "Fortran F2003"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-14
12:10:10 UTC ---
The issue is that SRA thinks
u.b = 1;
is
access { base = (1716)'u', offset = 0, size = 8, expr = u.b, type = _Bool, ...
note 'size = 8'. That is what get_ref_base_and_extent
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52242
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52238
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52237
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini 2012-02-14
12:36:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 26658
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26658
Draft
This is a slightly tweaked and extended version of the patch which I actually
booted and teste
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #63 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-14
13:01:09 UTC ---
With a (seemingly) unrelated patch (attached to PR52097) I'm back on ICEing
for the gfortran.dg/lto/pr45586*.f90 testcases ...
Even before the adjusted type merging we have (at co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52246
Bug #: 52246
Summary: translatable string typo: plural use ("one
translatable objects")
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52208
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #64 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-14
13:20:37 UTC ---
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-types.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/trans-types.c (revision 184203)
+++ gcc/fortran/trans-types.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52097
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-14
13:23:15 UTC ---
It works apart from introducing
FAIL: gfortran.dg/lto/pr45586-2 f_lto_pr45586-2_0.o-f_lto_pr45586-2_0.o link,
-O
0 -flto -flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin (internal compiler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-14
13:25:10 UTC ---
Index: gcc/tree-sra.c
===
--- gcc/tree-sra.c (revision 184203)
+++ gcc/tree-sra.c (working copy)
@@ -2172,1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52208
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-14
13:58:44 UTC ---
The -1000 costs comes from the scan_one_insn subtracting there
ira_memory_move_cost[][][] * frequency (i.e. memory_cost becomes -4000) and
on the plus we add just 3000 to memory_cost.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52097
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
--- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-02-14
14:27:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Thanks Manuel. Thus, I'm going to test your patch. Was wondering, maybe we
> want
> the nit: 'n_total > template_backtrace_limit + 2' n the condition,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini 2012-02-14
14:44:03 UTC ---
Agreed about the testcase, of course.
By the way, for the actual dejagnu testcase, a few weeks ago I noticed that
apparently testing for 'note:' is pretty weak, like if additional no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52214
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52247
Bug #: 52247
Summary: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with asm goto
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52142
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-02-14
15:15:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 26659
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26659
proposed patch
Actually Richard (rth), the restriction is less strict than that. We are
currently
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51528
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.5.4
Summary|[4.6 Regressi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51528
Bug 51528 depends on bug 52244, which changed state.
Bug 52244 Summary: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong code for function returning
union between int and _Bool at O > 2, with no-early-inlining
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-14
15:34:02 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 14 15:33:56 2012
New Revision: 184214
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184214
Log:
2012-02-14 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51528
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-14
15:34:02 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 14 15:33:56 2012
New Revision: 184214
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184214
Log:
2012-02-14 Richard Guenther
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52247
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52247
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-14
15:48:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 26660
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26660
gcc47-pr52247.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52097
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52248
Bug #: 52248
Summary: [4.7 Regression] timevar ICE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-invalid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
--- Comment #11 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-02-14
16:26:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> By the way, for the actual dejagnu testcase, a few weeks ago I noticed that
> apparently testing for 'note:' is pretty weak, like if additional notes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
--- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini 2012-02-14
16:45:20 UTC ---
> Any number of notes will be matched by a single "note:" test, since the
> testsuite does not detect duplicates. There is PR about this somewhere.
I'm not sure the issue is just abo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50335
--- Comment #11 from Gregory Maxwell 2012-02-14
17:15:23 UTC ---
Still crashing in, r184217.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52181
--- Comment #5 from Ulrich Weigand 2012-02-14
17:22:23 UTC ---
Thanks for the quick fix! Are you planning to backport to 4.6 as well?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52142
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson 2012-02-14
17:50:02 UTC ---
The patch in #c4 looks good.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52249
Bug #: 52249
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr32380.f
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48501
--- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
18:02:23 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Feb 14 18:02:09 2012
New Revision: 184218
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184218
Log:
PR go/48501
runtime: Fix identity hash f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48501
--- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
18:04:38 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Feb 14 18:04:28 2012
New Revision: 184219
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184219
Log:
PR go/48501
* go.test/go-test.exp (g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48501
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172
--- Comment #13 from Anton Shterenlikht 2012-02-14
18:08:03 UTC ---
yes, I confirm, fixed on FreeBSD 9.9-CURRENT #11 r231193M
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48411
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #10 from Ian Lance
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52218
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-14 18:31:28 UTC ---
> --- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-02-12
> 06:04:42 UTC ---
> In current mainline I'm not aware of any test failures on Solaris. The SPARC
> Solaris sy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250
Bug #: 52250
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in sel_remove_bb, at
sel-sched-ir.c:5213 with -fsel-sched-pipelining
-fsel-sched-pipelining-outer-loops
-fselective-sche
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-14 18:39:32 UTC ---
> --- Comment #6 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-02-12
> 19:52:02 UTC ---
> The patch fixes the test case and also passes some relevant Go tests.
>
> Rainer, if OK, I'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48411
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Ian Lance
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48411
--- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
18:58:52 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Feb 14 18:58:48 2012
New Revision: 184221
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184221
Log:
PR go/48411
* Make-lang.in (gccgo-cr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48411
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50031
--- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt 2012-02-14
19:40:23 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Tue Feb 14 19:40:13 2012
New Revision: 184225
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184225
Log:
2012-02-14 Bill Schmidt
Ira Rosen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48410
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51950
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-14
19:40:18 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 14 19:40:10 2012
New Revision: 184224
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184224
Log:
PR debug/51950
* dwarf2out.c (clone_tree_ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50969
--- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt 2012-02-14
19:40:22 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Tue Feb 14 19:40:13 2012
New Revision: 184225
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184225
Log:
2012-02-14 Bill Schmidt
Ira Rosen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48243
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48122
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48410
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
19:40:15 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Feb 14 19:40:09 2012
New Revision: 184223
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184223
Log:
PR go/48410
libgo: Don't put .gox files
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47726
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51950
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regression]|[4.6 Regression]
|fdebu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52247
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-14
19:51:06 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 14 19:51:01 2012
New Revision: 184229
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184229
Log:
PR c++/52247
* pt.c (tsubst_copy_asm_operan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47524
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32091
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
--- Comment #18 from Ian Lan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46795
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42293
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52251
Bug #: 52251
Summary: Nonadvancing I/O and the t edit descriptor
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Sev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47486
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50895
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz 2012-02-14 20:21:59
UTC ---
Well, the 4.7 error you get here is due unsupport posix-threading support for
libjava on Windows targets. Not sure if I want to enhance libjava that it
supports this feature.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51688
--- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz 2012-02-14 20:24:16
UTC ---
Hmm, canadian cross scenario. It seems libgcc checks here for build instead of
specified host.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz 2012-02-14 20:26:01
UTC ---
Hmm, this might be a duplicate of PR52238
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52251
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46795
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl
2012-02-14 20:37:39 UTC ---
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 08:01:35PM +, ian at airs dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46795
>
> --- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-02-14
> 20:01:35
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48407
--- Comment #5 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
20:47:42 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Feb 14 20:47:35 2012
New Revision: 184234
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184234
Log:
PR go/48407
runtime: Permit building lib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48407
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-14
22:04:35 UTC ---
> I'm currently doing so, and preliminary results look good. I've got a
> couple of comments on the patch as-is which I find harder than necessary
> to read/understand:
>
> * It uses
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52252
Bug #: 52252
Summary: An opportunity for x86 gcc vectorizer (gain up to 3
times)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51969
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-14
23:31:46 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 14 23:31:42 2012
New Revision: 184239
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184239
Log:
PR bootstrap/51969
Backported from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52230
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-14
23:32:44 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 14 23:32:39 2012
New Revision: 184240
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184240
Log:
Backported from mainline
2012-02-13 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52181
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-14
23:34:40 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 14 23:34:34 2012
New Revision: 184242
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184242
Log:
Backported from mainline
2012-02-14 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51950
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-14
23:35:19 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 14 23:35:15 2012
New Revision: 184243
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184243
Log:
Backported from mainline
2012-02-14 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52247
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-14
23:36:24 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 14 23:36:19 2012
New Revision: 184244
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184244
Log:
Backported from mainline
2012-02-14 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51969
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo