[Bug regression/52225] New: -minline-all-stringops possible stuck

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52225 Bug #: 52225 Summary: -minline-all-stringops possible stuck Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c++/52216] [C++11][noexcept] Wrong exception deduction for some forms of placement new

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52216 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler 2012-02-13 08:20:50 UTC --- There seems to be evidence for a core issue, I therefore would recommend to wait until a corresponding issue number is available.

[Bug target/52225] -minline-all-stringops possible stuck

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52225 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-linux-gnu Component|reg

[Bug rtl-optimization/52203] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7136 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 and other custom flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203 --- Comment #2 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-02-13 08:48:35 UTC --- Well, in this case the insn is vcvtps2pd (from avx_cvtps2pd256 and *avx_cvtps2pd256_2 patterns) but not having a reservation looks correct as the manual says "decode type -- micro

[Bug rtl-optimization/52203] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7136 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 and other custom flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203 Andrey Belevantsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/44783] implement -ftemplate-backtrace-limit=

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 20

[Bug c++/52224] [C++0x] Generic operator gets pulled into compile-time expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52224 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug bootstrap/52226] New: Trunk fails to bootstrap on Mac OS X.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52226 Bug #: 52226 Summary: Trunk fails to bootstrap on Mac OS X. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/52226] Trunk fails to bootstrap on Mac OS X.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52226 --- Comment #1 from Xiyue Deng 2012-02-13 09:24:01 UTC --- Created attachment 26646 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26646 Trunk build log

[Bug c++/52224] [C++0x] Generic operator gets pulled into compile-time expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52224 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler 2012-02-13 09:26:34 UTC --- I condensed the test case further down to the following: //--- template struct enable_if {}; template struct enable_if { typedef T type; }; template struct is_mine { enum { value =

[Bug tree-optimization/52210] vect_model_simple_cost: reading uninitialised memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52210 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-13 09:38:07 UTC --- Created attachment 26647 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26647 gcc47-pr52210.patch Untested fix. This has been caused by the PR50912 changes (r180819).

[Bug fortran/52227] New: TARGET attribute mishandled in polymorphic types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52227 Bug #: 52227 Summary: TARGET attribute mishandled in polymorphic types Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimizatio

[Bug web/52228] New: Bugzilla: Missing link for "PR...."

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52228 Bug #: 52228 Summary: Bugzilla: Missing link for "PR" Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/49829] [4.7 Regression] --disable-static --enable-shared regression: cannot find -lstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829 Vladimir Yakovlev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vbyakovl23 at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug middle-end/52209] [4.7 Regression] wrong code at -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52209 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-13 09:53:37 UTC --- Looks good to me.

[Bug bootstrap/49829] [4.7 Regression] --disable-static --enable-shared regression: cannot find -lstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829 --- Comment #26 from Vladimir Yakovlev 2012-02-13 09:59:31 UTC --- We have performance degradation of 447.dealII benchspec 2006.It was happened because there are no inlining a library routine '_Rb_tree_node_base' from libstdc++-v3/src/tree.cc co

[Bug bootstrap/52226] Trunk fails to bootstrap on Mac OS X.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52226 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-13 10:08:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > --enable-full-dynamic-string \ IS this a copy & paste error? It must be "fully" not "full"

[Bug middle-end/52209] [4.7 Regression] wrong code at -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52209 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-13 10:37:41 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 13 10:37:35 2012 New Revision: 184151 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184151 Log: PR middle-end/52209 * expr.c (expand_expr_r

[Bug middle-end/52209] [4.7 Regression] wrong code at -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52209 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/52146] [x32] - Wrong code to access addresses 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146 --- Comment #17 from Steffen Schmidt 2012-02-13 10:52:31 UTC --- Fixes work fine, thanks alot!

[Bug target/52229] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr32380.f -O scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 7 loops" 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52229 Bug #: 52229 Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr32380.f -O scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 7 loops" 1 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 S

[Bug bootstrap/52226] Trunk fails to bootstrap on Mac OS X.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52226 --- Comment #3 from Xiyue Deng 2012-02-13 11:03:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #0) > > --enable-full-dynamic-string \ > > IS this a copy & paste error? It must be "fully" not "full" Indeed that was an error. I f

[Bug bootstrap/52226] Trunk fails to bootstrap on Mac OS X.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52226 Xiyue Deng changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26646|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug testsuite/52229] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr32380.f -O scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 7 loops" 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52229 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |testsuite Target Milestone|---

[Bug web/52228] Bugzilla: Missing link for "PR...."

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52228 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/52226] Trunk fails to bootstrap on Mac OS X.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52226 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-apple-darwin10 Stat

[Bug target/52225] -minline-all-stringops possible stuck

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52225 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/52216] [C++11][noexcept] Wrong exception deduction for some forms of placement new

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52216 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/52226] Trunk fails to bootstrap on Mac OS X.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52226 --- Comment #6 from Xiyue Deng 2012-02-13 11:15:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Please specify the Xcode version you are using or alternatively what host > compiler you use. I'm using Xcode 3.2.6. GCC configuration: $ gcc -v Using built-i

[Bug c++/52224] [C++0x] Generic operator gets pulled into compile-time expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52224 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCON

[Bug libffi/52223] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] libffi's man page install breaks with multilibs and overridden mandir

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52223 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgomp/52230] New: OpenMP: Simple C program triggers SIGSEGV at execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52230 Bug #: 52230 Summary: OpenMP: Simple C program triggers SIGSEGV at execution Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/52226] Trunk fails to bootstrap on Mac OS X.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52226 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-13 11:17:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > --enable-concept-checks \ You probably don't want this, some of the concept checks are incompatible with C++11, you shouldn't enable them at configure

[Bug ada/52219] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: cxg2001

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52219 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug go/52218] [4.7 Regression] libgo ftbfs on arm-linux-gnueabi (unknown case for SETCONTEXT_CLOBBERS_TLS)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52218 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug bootstrap/52226] Trunk fails to bootstrap on Mac OS X.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52226 --- Comment #8 from Xiyue Deng 2012-02-13 11:23:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #3) > > --enable-concept-checks \ > > You probably don't want this, some of the concept checks are incompatible with > C++11, you shou

[Bug libgomp/52230] OpenMP: Simple C program triggers SIGSEGV at execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52230 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/52215] [4.7 Regression] __atomic_compare_exchange_n for enumeration type changes signature with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52215 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milest

[Bug middle-end/52214] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr44706.C -std=gnu++* scan-tree-dump-not fnsplit "Splitting function"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52214 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug translation/52211] Typo in translatable string: "-fdisble" ("-fdisable")

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52211 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-13 11:31:08 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Feb 13 11:31:00 2012 New Revision: 184152 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184152 Log: 2012-02-13 Richard Guenther PR transla

[Bug translation/52211] Typo in translatable string: "-fdisble" ("-fdisable")

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52211 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libgomp/52230] OpenMP: Simple C program triggers SIGSEGV at execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52230 --- Comment #2 from fanusergiu at yahoo dot com 2012-02-13 11:31:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > GCC 4.2 is not supported for several years already, and furthermore if I read > this well, this isn't gcc at all, but LLVM. Thanks for the fast

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/52226] Trunk fails to bootstrap on Mac OS X.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52226 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-13 11:44:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > I'm using Xcode 3.2.6. GCC configuration: > > $ gcc -v > Using built-in specs. > Target: i686-apple-darwin10 Could the problem be that you don't have an

[Bug bootstrap/52226] Trunk fails to bootstrap on Mac OS X.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52226 --- Comment #10 from Xiyue Deng 2012-02-13 11:48:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #6) > > I'm using Xcode 3.2.6. GCC configuration: > > > > $ gcc -v > > Using built-in specs. > > Target: i686-apple-darwin10 > > Could t

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13 11:53:38 UTC --- > Merging happens at WPA time, it happens again at LTRANS but that is an > implementation artifact (it should not be necessary to merge again). OK. > Ok, this sounds like it is a rea

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-02-13 11:57:43 UTC --- On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 > > --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13 > 11:53:38

[Bug middle-end/52230] OpenMP: Simple C program triggers SIGSEGV at execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52230 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/52230] OpenMP: Simple C program triggers SIGSEGV at execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52230 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openmp Status|REOPENED

[Bug middle-end/52230] OpenMP: Simple C program triggers SIGSEGV at execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52230 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-13 12:05:12 UTC --- Created attachment 26649 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26649 gcc47-pr52230.patch Untested fix.

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13 12:17:46 UTC --- > Sth I'm not very familiar is the QUAL_UNION record kinds - maybe you > can eye the two merging machineries for obvious errors here? I did, and only came up with the following no-op

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-02-13 12:29:36 UTC --- On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 > > --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13 > 12:17:46

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13 12:39:06 UTC --- > I see. I came up with the following, but it's unlikely to make a > difference either Thanks, I'll give it a try. While Ada doesn't use METHOD_TYPE, it extensively uses type attrib

[Bug bootstrap/52226] Trunk fails to bootstrap on Mac OS X.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52226 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-02-13 13:09:26 UTC --- > Could the problem be that you don't have an assembler that supports 64-bit? What does return '/usr/libexec/gcc/darwin/x86_64/as -v' (after it you need to interupt as with ct

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-13 13:29:38 UTC --- Ok, the issue is that we end up with using a type streamed into the function sections - those are assumed to not need participating in merging and thus we never merge them, even can

[Bug c++/52231] New: [missed optimization/diagnostics] address-of-reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52231 Bug #: 52231 Summary: [missed optimization/diagnostics] address-of-reference Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-13 13:42:49 UTC --- Should PLACEHOLDER_EXPRs even survive gimplification? I see tree.c says if they survive until expand we'll ICE - but that comment is probably from before gimple/SSA times.

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-13 13:44:44 UTC --- Or, alternatively - should DECL_QUALIFIER matter at all after gimplification? Can we simply not stream it (thus, have a NULL_TREE DECL_QUALIFIER in WPA and LTRANS stage)?

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13 13:53:01 UTC --- > Still they are refered to globally. I'm refering to > atree__atree_private_part__node_record___is_extension___XVN > (it doesn't have any TYPE_CONTEXT though, and its TYPE_SIZE is a

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13 13:54:31 UTC --- > Should PLACEHOLDER_EXPRs even survive gimplification? I see tree.c says > if they survive until expand we'll ICE - but that comment is probably from > before gimple/SSA times. Yes

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13 13:55:47 UTC --- > Or, alternatively - should DECL_QUALIFIER matter at all after gimplification? No, it shouldn't. > Can we simply not stream it (thus, have a NULL_TREE DECL_QUALIFIER in WPA > and L

[Bug c++/52215] [4.7 Regression] __atomic_compare_exchange_n for enumeration type changes signature with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52215 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-02-13 14:03:27 UTC --- On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 > > --- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13 > 13:55:4

[Bug libffi/52223] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] libffi's man page install breaks with multilibs and overridden mandir

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52223 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-02-13 14:13:39 UTC --- On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 > > > > -

[Bug translation/52232] New: translatable string typos: "conindexed" (should be "coindexed")

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52232 Bug #: 52232 Summary: translatable string typos: "conindexed" (should be "coindexed") Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-02-13 14:18:58 UTC --- On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 > > Eric Botcazou changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #19 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13 14:21:57 UTC --- > Which should avoid the issue. But I suppose that variably_modified_type_p > wrongly checks > > if (TREE_CODE (type) == QUAL_UNION_TYPE) > RETURN_TRUE_IF_

[Bug c++/52233] New: ICE segmentation fault with non-recursive templates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52233 Bug #: 52233 Summary: ICE segmentation fault with non-recursive templates Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #20 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-13 14:43:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > > Which should avoid the issue. But I suppose that variably_modified_type_p > > wrongly checks > > > > if (TREE_CODE (type) == QUAL_UNION_

[Bug libffi/52221] [libffi] r184021 needs to be fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 --- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz 2012-02-13 15:18:19 UTC --- Author: ktietz Date: Mon Feb 13 15:18:14 2012 New Revision: 184155 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184155 Log: PR libffi/52221 * src/x86/ffi.c (ffi_p

[Bug libffi/52221] [libffi] r184021 needs to be fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52215] [4.7 Regression] __atomic_compare_exchange_n for enumeration type changes signature with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52215 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Macleod 2012-02-13 15:27:04 UTC --- I think that is better.. its is just the I{1,2,4,8,16} we care about.

[Bug web/52228] Bugzilla: Missing link for "PR...."

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52228 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug web/52228] Bugzilla: Missing link for "PR...."

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52228 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/52225] -minline-all-stringops possible stuck

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52225 --- Comment #3 from Dzianis Kahanovich 2012-02-13 15:35:08 UTC --- OK, I will try to reproduce problem on chrooted environment (I rebuild system on this machine).

[Bug c/52190] question about atomic intrinsics -- test and documentation vary -- please clarify

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52190 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Macleod 2012-02-13 15:37:38 UTC --- Author: amacleod Date: Mon Feb 13 15:37:33 2012 New Revision: 184156 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184156 Log: 2012-02-13 Andrew MacLeod PR c/52190

[Bug web/52228] Bugzilla: Missing link for "PR...."

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52228 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-13 15:39:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > My regexp explicitly forbirds / right before PR but I cannot remember why maybe so it doesn't catch external links like http://sourceware.org/PR123 ?

[Bug web/52228] Bugzilla: Missing link for "PR...."

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52228 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-13 15:40:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > My regexp explicitly forbirds / right before PR but I cannot remember > > why > > maybe so it doesn't catch external lin

[Bug web/52228] Bugzilla: Missing link for "PR...."

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52228 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-13 15:44:21 UTC --- as shown at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2012-02/msg01317.html

[Bug target/52225] -minline-all-stringops possible stuck

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52225 --- Comment #4 from Dzianis Kahanovich 2012-02-13 15:49:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Can you explain what you mean by stuck? Also all those flags look like you > are > trying to test out the compiler and not really the system. > > P

[Bug translation/52234] New: translatable string typo: "argument argument"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52234 Bug #: 52234 Summary: translatable string typo: "argument argument" Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug rtl-optimization/52203] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7136 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 and other custom flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203 --- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak 2012-02-13 15:54:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Well, in this case the insn is vcvtps2pd (from avx_cvtps2pd256 and > *avx_cvtps2pd256_2 patterns) but not having a reservation looks correct as the > manual sa

[Bug web/52228] Bugzilla: Missing link for "PR...."

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52228 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug rtl-optimization/52203] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7136 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 and other custom flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203 --- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2012-02-13 16:00:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > The bugs you are referring to were real bugs, where wrong or missing operand > was accessed from attribute calculation machinery. ... and PR 49014, where ind

[Bug rtl-optimization/52203] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7136 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 and other custom flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203 --- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak 2012-02-13 16:01:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > > The bugs you are referring to were real bugs, where wrong or missing operand > > was accessed from attribute calculation machin

[Bug web/52228] Bugzilla: Missing link for "PR...."

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52228 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug target/52225] -minline-all-stringops possible stuck

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52225 Dzianis Kahanovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug web/52228] Bugzilla: Missing link for "PR...."

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52228 --- Comment #9 from Frédéric Buclin 2012-02-13 16:24:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Regarding comment 0, how about such a pattern: > > qr/(? Best would be a pattern, which only prohibits "http(s):"[nonwhitespace]/PR". Of course, but nega

[Bug libffi/52223] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] libffi's man page install breaks with multilibs and overridden mandir

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52223 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-02-13 16:50:17 UTC --- This ought to work. Does applying the fix I discuss in - setting FLAGS_TO_PASS = $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) in Makefil

[Bug rtl-optimization/52235] New: rtlanal: commutative_operand_precedence should prioritize regs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52235 Bug #: 52235 Summary: rtlanal: commutative_operand_precedence should prioritize regs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/52235] rtlanal: commutative_operand_precedence should prioritize regs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52235 --- Comment #1 from Paulo J. Matos 2012-02-13 16:58:17 UTC --- Created attachment 26651 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26651 Patch to increase regs priority in commutative_operand_precedence

[Bug c/52236] New: segfault in program that results from compiling sha512-hash.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52236 Bug #: 52236 Summary: segfault in program that results from compiling sha512-hash.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libffi/52221] [libffi] r184021 needs to be fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|WAITING Resolution|FIXED

[Bug c/52236] segfault in program that results from compiling sha512-hash.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52236 --- Comment #1 from Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn 2012-02-13 17:03:49 UTC --- The host is linux x86_64. More information about the platform is queried automatically by the buildbot and archived here: https://tahoe-lafs.org/buildbot-pycryptopp/builders/Rub

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13 17:06:44 UTC --- > Yeah. I'm now getting further with Ada LTO bootstrap, but hit an ICE > during optimization: > > /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/ada/sem_prag.adb: In function > 'sem_prag__analy

[Bug c++/44783] implement -ftemplate-backtrace-limit=

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783 --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-02-13 17:09:50 UTC --- Any of you has a minimal self-contained testcase? The ones I used when implementing this, no longer need this option. Thanks. This is my totally untested but compiles patch. Pro

[Bug bootstrap/49829] [4.7 Regression] --disable-static --enable-shared regression: cannot find -lstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829 --- Comment #27 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-02-13 17:12:57 UTC --- Vladimir: if you want to report this problem, please open a new bug report. Please do not tag on to this unrelated bug report. Thanks.

  1   2   >