http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52150
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-08
08:03:43 UTC ---
Started with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181105
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52158
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52167
Bug #: 52167
Summary: self-assignment should at least produce
use-of-uninitialized warning
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52150
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-08
08:37:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 26607
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26607
gcc47-pr52150.patch
Untested fix. I took the liberty to also overwrite the last _ with . or $,
so t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52166
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-08
09:01:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Workaround is to #include instead of , but it's annoying given
> that the former is supposedly The Right Way for C++ programs to bring in the
> header.
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52167
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52168
Bug #: 52168
Summary: fixinclude test failure for complex.h on netbsd
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52035
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2012-02-08
09:52:15 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 8 09:52:11 2012
New Revision: 184000
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184000
Log:
PR c++/52035
* pt.c (tsubst): Strip uninsta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51675
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2012-02-08
09:52:23 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 8 09:52:19 2012
New Revision: 184001
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184001
Log:
PR c++/51675
* semantics.c (cx_check_missin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52168
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-08
10:19:50 UTC ---
Weird original formatting in complex.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52167
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52166
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52165
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52164
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-08
10:27:32 UTC ---
Perhaps waste of space, but we have been including them there in the past, so
removing them would be an ABI change. They could be made into @ as opposed to
@@ symbols, so that nobody
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51675
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52169
Bug #: 52169
Summary: the ifstream readsome() method does not signal any bit
on eof.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52150
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-02-08 10:31:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created attachment 26607 [details]
> gcc47-pr52150.patch
>
> Untested fix. I took the liberty to also overwrite the last _ with . or $,
> so that at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52159
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-08
10:38:31 UTC ---
It seems that for some weird reason you got two sections for the function
fprintf. Which means that there were two functions fprintf that have not
been merged at WPA stage.
fortran -v:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gfortran
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/bardeau/Softs/gcc-4.7.0-20120208/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk-source/gcc/configure
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enabl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52169
Tomalak Geret'kal changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at kera dot name
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52157
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48743
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52169
--- Comment #2 from Tomalak Geret'kal 2012-02-08
10:45:17 UTC ---
Are you sure it's not just that in_avail is 0? Why should it be -1 here?
i.e. doesn't readsome become a noop when there's nothing to read?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52169
--- Comment #3 from Lluís Batlle i Rossell
2012-02-08 10:53:20 UTC ---
It looks also related to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8258 . The
post from Tomalak and that made all clear.
Sorry for the noise!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52169
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52166
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-08
10:58:16 UTC ---
N.B. if we enabled in C++03 mode users would (rightly) complain that
it makes it harder to write portable programs, and it would be a problem for
autoconf-style tests which check fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Bug #: 52170
Summary: ICE in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:57 during
simplify_plus_minus
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-08
11:32:12 UTC ---
#3 0x00adba40 in neg_const_int (mode=V16QImode, i=0x7765c460) at
/work/local-checkouts/gcc-fsf/gcc/simplify-rtx.c:70
#4 0x00ae96bf in simplify_plus_minus (code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-*-*, x86_64-*-*,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|N
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-08
11:46:35 UTC ---
There are some missed optimizations in simplify-rtx.c, obvious if you look
at uses of const*_rtx.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52139
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-08
12:29:48 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 8 12:29:43 2012
New Revision: 184005
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184005
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/52139
* cfgrtl.c (cfg_l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171
Bug #: 52171
Summary: memcmp/strcmp/strncmp can be optimized when the result
is tested for [in]equality with 0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52150
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-08
13:27:37 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 8 13:27:31 2012
New Revision: 184006
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184006
Log:
PR gcov-profile/52150
* coverage.c: Include
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-08
13:29:28 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 8 13:29:22 2012
New Revision: 184007
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184007
Log:
2012-02-08 Richard Guenther
PR rtl-opt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52150
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50561
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172
Bug #: 52172
Summary: [4.7 FreeBSD ia64 regression] stage 3 Bootstrap
comparison failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26446
--- Comment #6 from Clément David 2012-02-08
13:49:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 26611
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26611
Test case
I'm able to reproduce with gcc 4.6.2 with a simple test case.
The attached conftest.cpp c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52167
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52165
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46886
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-08
14:16:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 26612
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26612
alternative patch
Alternative patch I am testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||ia64-*-freebsd9.9
Status|U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172
--- Comment #2 from Anton Shterenlikht 2012-02-08
14:35:50 UTC ---
Just "make configure" using FreeBSD ports infrastructure, same as always.
Or do you want to see config.log?
If yes, please let me know which one, and I'll post it.
# find . -nam
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-08
14:37:24 UTC ---
For comparison against constants it might be worthwhile to still allow two
loads to improve the number of alignment cases we can handle. Well, I'm not
sure we can expect anything m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-02-08
14:42:48 UTC ---
> Trying to update from gcc-4.7.0.20120107 to 4.7.0.20120128
You should try a revision post 183751 that fixed
PR bootstrap/52041
PR bootstrap/52039
PR target/51974
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52165
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46886
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.0
AssignedTo|spop at gcc d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46886
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-08
15:28:06 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 8 15:28:01 2012
New Revision: 184010
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184010
Log:
2012-03-08 Richard Guenther
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52165
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-08
15:32:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 26613
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26613
gcc47-pr52165.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-02-08 15:34:32 UTC ---
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, amodra at gmail dot com wrote:
> Correct. In fact, I think it's a waste of space to put the soft-float
> functions in the normal ppc32 libgcc. Th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50561
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Grosser 2012-02-08
15:38:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 26614
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26614
A possible fix
Here a possible fix. The commit message is:
Removing old scattering dimensions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
Bug #: 52173
Summary: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed possibly
caused by itm
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-08
15:52:18 UTC ---
Yeah, that might be a good idea. As it would be just an optimization compared
to the present state, we might in the first step do it just for the ppc targets
that have full float/doub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
--- Comment #1 from Jack Lloyd 2012-02-08 15:52:19
UTC ---
Created attachment 26615
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26615
Testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
Jack Lloyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26615|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50561
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-08
16:02:18 UTC ---
Sure, I will check.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
--- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl
2012-02-08 16:15:20 UTC ---
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:38:42AM +, bardeau at iram dot fr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
>
> --- Comment #10 from Sebastien Bardeau 2012-02-08
> 10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
--- Comment #12 from Sebastien Bardeau 2012-02-08
16:22:47 UTC ---
Ok, I did not realize that this patch was just a fix candidate.
This bug is not a problem to me, so there is no hurry.
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52140
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52174
Bug #: 52174
Summary: Implicit conversion of nullptr to bool
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52151
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52174
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52174
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-08
16:55:26 UTC ---
but N.B. http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1423
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50561
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-02-08
17:02:16 UTC ---
I saw a similar ICE for the polyhedron test air.f90. The patch in comment #7
fixes the ICE. However it produces a wrong code for -O2 and above, unless I use
-fwhole-program.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52164
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52174
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-08 18:10:31 UTC ---
> --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-08
> 10:44:51 UTC ---
> Please fill out known-to-work and known-to-fail fields. Was it "working"
Done.
> in any
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52164
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52175
Bug #: 52175
Summary: [4.7 regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start after
invalid dbr_schedule transformation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52175
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mips*-*-*
Status|UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose 2012-02-08
19:24:42 UTC ---
it's not some snapshot, as it looks these were exported consistently since
4.1.1 releases. Do you say that these symbols are not exported for e.g. Fedora
packages?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-08
19:26:56 UTC ---
Yes, they are not exported in Fedora/RHEL packages.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52151
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-08
19:40:31 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Feb 8 19:40:23 2012
New Revision: 184016
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184016
Log:
2012-02-08 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/52
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32380
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig 2012-02-08
19:53:59 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Feb 8 19:53:56 2012
New Revision: 184017
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184017
Log:
2012-02-08 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32380
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27403
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-08
20:16:38 UTC ---
t4.cc:4:17: error: type/value mismatch at argument 1 in template parameter list
for ‘template > struct A’
t4.cc:4:17: error: expected a constant of type ‘int’, got ‘T()’
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51312
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||27403
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43181
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52176
Bug #: 52176
Summary: Valgrind complains about some realloc on assignment to
unallocated LHS
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19104
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-08
20:47:39 UTC ---
Related to PR 19105 and PR 46309
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21643
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||46309
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52177
Bug #: 52177
Summary: ICE: verify_gimple failed: non-trivial conversion at
assignment with __atomic_is_lock_free()
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22568
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-08
20:59:51 UTC ---
I have a patch to tree-ssa-phiopt.c to fix comment #1 though it needs another
patch to expr.c to produce the cmov directly from COND_EXPR. I hope to post
both patches for 4.8.0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl
2012-02-08 21:15:50 UTC ---
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 09:02:06PM +, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher 2012-02-08
> 21:02:06 UTC ---
> Did this feature already exist in GC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52151
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-08
21:29:52 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Feb 8 21:29:45 2012
New Revision: 184020
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184020
Log:
2012-02-08 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/52
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52151
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
