http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-08
10:44:51 UTC ---
Please fill out known-to-work and known-to-fail fields. Was it "working"
in any 4.6.x release? Especially was it "working" in 4.6.0? If so regressing
on the branch is very bad.
Did the revert fix any regression that was reported as a bug and has gotten
a testcase? If not, then the proper way to address this new regression is
to revert the revert especially as it appearantly happened during stage4(?)
