http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51366
--- Comment #6 from Denis Excoffier 2012-01-18
08:45:36 UTC ---
This bug was still present under gcc-4.7-20120107 snapshot, but it
does no longer show up under gcc-4.7-20120114 snapshot. I suppose it has
been corrected. Thank you.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51505
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Bonzini 2012-01-18 08:58:33
UTC ---
I think you can just kill the note and call df_notes_rescan, can't you? (Sorry
for leaving this implicit in comment 4 and then forgetting about it yesterday).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782
--- Comment #13 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-01-18
09:17:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Author: rguenth
> Date: Tue Jan 17 14:52:57 2012
> New Revision: 183249
Just for feedback: In r183270 the bug is still present (and -fno-tree-sra is
wo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19520
--- Comment #25 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-18
09:21:14 UTC ---
LD bug: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13600
The GCC side is a QOI thing and maybe a conformance thing. ICC generates
for
__attribute__((visibility("protected"))
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50873
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51890
Bug #: 51890
Summary: vectorizer does not recognize intrinsic functions like
sqrt
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40419
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51505
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-01-18
09:46:41 UTC ---
This seems like an overkill as we only need to remove a single vector. The
below helper looks enough:
+/* Remove the EQ_USES vector for INSN assuming it exists. */
+void
+df_re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51891
Bug #: 51891
Summary: class_copyIvarList crashes on empty ivars
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51885
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51890
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51889
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51887
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51859
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-18
10:08:39 UTC ---
*** Bug 51887 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
--- Comment #20 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-18
10:16:10 UTC ---
Status:
a) Passing absent optional as actual argument to elemental procedures.
4.4-4.7 Regression. Fixed on the 4.7 trunk, needs backporting.
See comment 5 / http://gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51879
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-18
10:36:39 UTC ---
I'm afraid a lot would break. It really depends on what you use VN for and on
what code.
If you have:
D.12345_1 = bar (7);
D.12346_2 = bar (7);
and bar isn't const/pure call, then
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49484
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-18
10:38:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> It doesn't really help - there are more races. The following does seem
> to help though, but is certainly not applicable.
>
> Index: gcc/libgcov.c
> ===
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51879
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-18
10:45:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I'm afraid a lot would break. It really depends on what you use VN for and on
> what code.
> If you have:
> D.12345_1 = bar (7);
> D.12346_2 = bar (7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51879
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49484
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51505
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Bonzini 2012-01-18 10:58:19
UTC ---
Not using df_notes_rescan looks like premature optimization to me...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444
--- Comment #14 from Martin Jambor 2012-01-18
11:23:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 26362
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26362
patch-in-progress
I talked to richi on IRC yesterday and we agreed that because we rely
on build_re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49484
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-18
11:49:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 26363
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26363
draft patch
Draft patch that doesn't work because we do not unconditionally
provide __GTHREAD_MU
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48660
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|rsandifo at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51505
--- Comment #11 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-01-18
12:02:36 UTC ---
No problem -- I will go back to df_notes_rescan and repost to gcc-patches.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49030
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50090
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51890
--- Comment #2 from Heiko Klein 2012-01-18
12:26:18 UTC ---
Thanks,
adding -fno-math-errno vectorizes the code and gives exactly the speedup as
with icc.
Heiko
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
--- Comment #21 from Mikael Morin 2012-01-18
13:05:01 UTC ---
Thanks Tobias.
(In reply to comment #20)
> Status:
>
> a) Passing absent optional as actual argument to elemental procedures.
>4.4-4.7 Regression. Fixed on the 4.7 trunk, needs b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49484
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19520
--- Comment #26 from Thiago Macieira 2012-01-18
13:28:05 UTC ---
ld *can* link, it just chooses not to.
$ cat > foo.c
__attribute__((visibility("protected")))
void * foo (void) { return (void *)foo; }
$ gcc -fPIC -shared foo.c
/usr/b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057
--- Comment #4 from gee 2012-01-18 13:28:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 26365
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26365
proposed patch
it fixes invalid padding that caused the bug.
#include
#define DEBUG 1
#include
#include
#in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49484
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26363|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49484
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-18
13:35:28 UTC ---
Well, pthread_once can't be called in fork child if fork has been done from
multi-threaded process (similarly to most other calls).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500
--- Comment #7 from gee 2012-01-18 13:35:15 UTC ---
after applying pr50057 patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26365
=== libjava Summary ===
# of expected passes2324
# of unexpected failures51
#
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26324|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784
--- Comment #36 from Iain Sandoe 2012-01-18 13:47:36
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> 5) to determine if you need to load the pic register or not, you should match
> what
> the prologue expansion does, try
> (pic_offset_table_rtx
> && (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50946
Matthew Gretton-Dann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mgretton at sourceware dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10901
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to fail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51892
Bug #: 51892
Summary: +initialize is not being called when calling class
method via new runtime
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19520
--- Comment #27 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-18
15:17:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> The linker, however, mandates that the address to symbol should not be loaded
> directly, but only through the GOT. This is necessary because the psABI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49484
--- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-18
15:41:02 UTC ---
Hmm, and as libgcov is static we can end up with multiple copies in shared
libraries which means multiple mutexes and thus exposal to the fcntl
file-locking ineffectiveness (in thi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51850
--- Comment #1 from Edward Rosten 2012-01-18
16:35:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 26368
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26368
Adds bounds checking to std::array and tr1::array in debug mode.
I've attached a patch which adds b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51893
Bug #: 51893
Summary: Wrong subword index computation in store_bit_field_1
on BIG_ENDIAN targets
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51893
Aurelien Buhrig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10901
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #24
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #20 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-18 17:24:23 UTC ---
Author: kargl
Date: Wed Jan 18 17:24:14 2012
New Revision: 183277
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183277
Log:
Insert ChangeLog entry that should have b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51830
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10901
--- Comment #25 from Iain Sandoe 2012-01-18 18:29:12
UTC ---
Created attachment 26370
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26370
initial fix
this shares some changes with the fix to PR51784 (and that is somewhere to read
about the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51875
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-01-18 18:49:55 UTC ---
On 1/17/2012 5:03 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Confirmed. That seems to be the usual by-reference passing for a callee copy
> thing. Not sure if we can cater f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51845
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-18
18:51:57 UTC ---
I think the bug is in the two argument erase in hashtable.h.
In the testcase we are removing two elements, the last element from bucket 10
and first element from bucket 20, but there
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51894
Bug #: 51894
Summary: Fail to warn on likely precedence error in conditional
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49642
--- Comment #10 from William J. Schmidt
2012-01-18 19:28:23 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Wed Jan 18 19:28:19 2012
New Revision: 183284
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183284
Log:
gcc:
2012-01-11 Bill Schmidt
PR t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51830
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51364
--- Comment #12 from Ryan S. Arnold 2012-01-18 20:00:08
UTC ---
Returning to the bug report at hand...
In my version of float.h I have the following (which aligns with the typedef
definitions in the std::decimal namespace). This works just fine
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51344
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to wo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51866
--- Comment #7 from François Dumont 2012-01-18
20:18:20 UTC ---
Author: fdumont
Date: Wed Jan 18 20:17:57 2012
New Revision: 183285
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183285
Log:
2012-01-18 François Dumont
Roman Kon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49642
William J. Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #11 from William
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51225
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-18 20:27:27 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Jan 18 20:27:23 2012
New Revision: 183286
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183286
Log:
/cp
2012-01-18 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51225
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51866
François Dumont changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51845
--- Comment #18 from François Dumont 2012-01-18
20:44:21 UTC ---
I was about to say that resolution of PR 51866 might also explain the memory
issue of this PR but I am now going to double check your post.
Thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51845
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-18
20:52:27 UTC ---
Other alternatives to fix this would be to add
size_t __prev_bkt = _M_bucket_index(__prev_n);
before the for (;;) loop and change the
if (__n && __n_bkt != __bkt)
test to
if (__
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51634
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas 2012-01-18 20:52:51
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jan 18 20:52:48 2012
New Revision: 183287
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183287
Log:
2012-01-18 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/51634
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49642
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40761
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51893
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51893
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51891
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51892
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51895
Bug #: 51895
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51896
Bug #: 51896
Summary: Should gcc warn if a variable initializer inside a
switch statement is never used?
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42688
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44378
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46784
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50236
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mipsel-linux-uclibc
Status|WA
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51895
--- Comment #1 from Peter Bergner 2012-01-19
02:42:44 UTC ---
We ICE when we try and do a BLK move from a reg:TI. In GCC 4.6, we don't see
this, since the args[i].tree_value is different:
(gdb-gcc4.6) ptree args[i].tree_value
unit siz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51897
Bug #: 51897
Summary: command line option to create a namespace alias
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40030
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26692
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30775
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30994
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-19
04:37:33 UTC ---
>From the sound of it, libmudflap is not being initialized before QT is. QT is
calling malloc in its initialization and malloc returns NULL.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35260
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38355
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31394
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32412
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32537
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51889
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33394
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34881
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34259
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34259
--- Comment #4 from P-VEREECKE at siih5962 dot fr 2012-01-19 05:32:49 UTC ---
Je suis absent du 16/1/2012 au 18/1/2012 inclus.
Je traiterai votre message à mon retour le 19/1/2012.
Pour toute urgence, contacter la cellule d'appels au 44481.
Merc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35676
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50200
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-19
05:42:43 UTC ---
This works on the trunk for me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50211
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50203
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51695
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #8 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51226
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35080
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo