http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51537
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51521
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|cris-axis-elf |
Host|x86_64-unknown-linux-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51538
Bug #: 51538
Summary: std::set::insert(InputIterator first, InputIterator
last) makes set uniterable
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51529
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-12-13
22:18:44 UTC ---
The problem is the following, for:
allocate(t2 :: x(10))
one has:
x._data.data = (void * restrict) __builtin_malloc (640);
I had now expected that one would do:
for (i = 1; i <=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51539
Bug #: 51539
Summary: multiplies ::operator () undocumented
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/latest-doxygen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51539
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51538
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-13
22:40:26 UTC ---
memcmp is not a strict weak ordering
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51477
--- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-12-13
22:50:55 UTC ---
I can't reproduce the behaviour on recent builds from trunk. E.g, on
r182308 I am getting:
$ cat -n test-PR51475.cc
1#include
2
3struct A
4{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51477
--- Comment #3 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-12-13
22:52:13 UTC ---
Err, sorry the previous comment was for another bug. Forget about it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51475
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540
Bug #: 51540
Summary: partial_sum (int *, int *, int *, multiplies < int >)
does not use operator +(complex, complex)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51473
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51473
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51473
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51539
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-13
23:12:47 UTC ---
It returns x*y, which may or may not be the product, the binary operator* could
be overloaded for Tp with a completely different meaning.
Actually I'm wondering if it's worth adding
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51541
Bug #: 51541
Summary: ICE on ill-formed alias template declarations
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51539
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Yeleighton
2011-12-13 23:30:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It returns x*y, which may or may not be the product, the binary operator*
> could
> be overloaded for Tp with a completely different meaning.
The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51539
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED
AssignedTo|redi at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-13
23:41:26 UTC ---
what has complex got to do with it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
Bug #: 51542
Summary: bootstrap failure due to uninitialized variable use in
c-parser
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51464
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-14 00:36:19 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Dec 14 00:36:15 2011
New Revision: 182320
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182320
Log:
/cp
2011-12-13 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51464
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51543
Bug #: 51543
Summary: terrible diagnostic for wrong type when expected class
or namespace
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51538
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51544
Bug #: 51544
Summary: uninitialized variable false positive prevents
bootstrap at -O3
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51530
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51544
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #23 from Cesar Strauss 2011-12-14
01:03:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Patch applied.
Thanks! Good to have Ada back on x86 MinGW.
Regards,
Cesar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51545
Bug #: 51545
Summary: missing -Wparentheses diagnostic with compound
assignment used as condition
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51475
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-12-14
01:16:28 UTC ---
I can still reproduce it with 182320. Note that quite a few of these ICEs filed
by Volker disappear or become "... bailing out" in release-mode. Not to say we
shouldn't fix them (when
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
--- Comment #17 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-12-14 01:43:11
UTC ---
The most recent patch is against gcc 4.6, and mainline is different.
I have just moved the support for reading export data out of the Go frontend
proper. The purpose of this move
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51538
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-14
01:53:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Here source exaple:
> //
>
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
You're missing and "using nam
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51546
Bug #: 51546
Summary: [4.7 Regression] error: fallthru to exit from bb 2
compiling libstdc++-v3/src/strstream.cc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51546
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51521
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51538
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-14
02:02:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> > const FOOwrapper & operator=(const FOOwrapper & othr)
> > {
> > memcpy(&m_uidl, &othr.m_uidl, sizeof(FOO));
> > return *this;
> >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51212
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51254
--- Comment #5 from Yuehai Du 2011-12-14 02:29:07
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, duyuehai at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51254
> >
> > Yuehai Du changed:
> >
> >W
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51406
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51547
Bug #: 51547
Summary: auto, type deduction, reference collapsing and const:
invalid initialization of reference of type 'const
X&&' from expression of type 'const X'
Classification
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-12-14 05:17:04 UTC ---
PR 50148.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51161
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-14
05:18:48 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Dec 14 05:18:39 2011
New Revision: 182322
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182322
Log:
PR c++/51406
PR c++/51161
* typeck.c (b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51406
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-14
05:18:47 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Dec 14 05:18:39 2011
New Revision: 182322
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182322
Log:
PR c++/51406
PR c++/51161
* typeck.c (b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51523
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-12-14 06:02:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 26075
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26075
Two resolution files
Here you are.
The resolution files differ depending on whether -fvisibility
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540
Christopher Yeleighton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51548
Bug #: 51548
Summary: It is impossible to provide translations of some gcc
error messages
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51475
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-14
07:22:59 UTC ---
This one segfaults right away for me, even with trunk as of today (though, I've
preprocessed it with 4.6.2 g++ -E -std=c++0x), so this is the more important
ice-on-invalid-code categor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51549
Bug #: 51549
Summary: QList::operator[] crash in 32bit release version on
MacOS for gcc 4.2.1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.1
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51549
--- Comment #1 from sami.lehtonen at digia dot com 2011-12-14 07:44:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 26077
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26077
Crash report
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51535
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
101 - 152 of 152 matches
Mail list logo