http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51539
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |UNCONFIRMED
AssignedTo|redi at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
| |gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|1 |0
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-13
23:35:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> But then the meaning of the types defined by the class is also
> self-explanatory
> and documented elsewhere, yet they are documented.
They're documented in the binary_function base class and doxygen copies that to
all derived classes.
> You choose: either you add one sentence to the documentation or you use so
> many
> sentences to explain why the sentence need not be added. As you like it.
One sentence? Why only add it to multiplies, not the other arithmetic
operations?
Actually, I choose to do nothing since I don't like being told what to do, I
have more important fixes to make.
